Despite being a 260-page book about pterosaur evolution, taxonomy, and paleoecology, this book is actually a great and, dare-I-say, fun read. The author writes in a lively style that engages the reader at every page; in addition, he has humor and wit. A few things I really like about this book:
1. Pictures. There are artist illustrations, photos of fossils, phylogenetic trees, anatomical diagrams, size comparisons, biomechanical models, timelines - every page is bursting with images that literally illustrate what the author is writing.
2. Balance. There is a clear order - each clade gets a chapter that is neatly broken into an intro, anatomy, locomotion, and paleoecology. The book is overall balanced, in that the author goes into just enough detail to engage the reader without bogging you do with endless minutiae about every metacarpal from Cretaceous Brazil.
3. References. If you do want to read endless minutiae about every metacarpal from Cretaceous Brazil, the citations will easily give you every source you could want. Every fact, every theory, every paragraph, is rigorously cited with numerous works. I would not be surprised if literally every work on pterosaurs before 2013 was referenced at some point by this author, who goes out of their way to include international scientists from beyond the Anglosphere (for example, China, Brazil, Argentina, Morocco). I have never, in all my life, read a book as thoroughly referenced as this.
4. Scientific Thinking. The author never just states a favored theory and leaves it at that. For every past and current debate in pterosaur studies, or even every debate about how individual genera lived and functioned biologically, the author lays out the history of the argument. He presents the different factions, the history of their research, their evidence, the dialogue between them, the response of the scientific community over time. It really made me feel like a pterosaur-scientist, because he so consistently engaged me, the reader, in the thought process of sifting through competing theories to decide which one seems more likely.