What do you think?
Rate this book


220 pages, Kindle Edition
First published January 1, 1995
Goodness, what a beautiful book! Beautiful, but oh so painful. It is only a short novel, but one of enormous power – though, for me, cleverly hidden power. Ultimately I think it samples and passes on a piece of the deep pain of living with human creativity, expressed in marvellously poetic terms. Which are perhaps the only terms possible, given the subject matter of this novel: an aspect of the nature and role of creative art in the human condition (what else is it that makes us human, other than the ability to be poetic – poetic and immeasurably, unfathomably kind - or cruel - to each other?) And a moving, effective and convincing glimpse of the truth of the human condition is the stuff of which all great books are made in my vie. Expressed a little differently and more exactly: what we have here is succinct commentary on the situation – the joy, the pain – in which extremely creative human beings find themselves. Highs and lows. The highs of creativity; the lows of often being a social outcast because of how different you are from the rest. Bullying, in other words. And the idea that in order to reflect artistically on the world, you first have the feel the pain which fills it?
The key metaphor for me in the book is Noria's singing. It is her ability to sing so sweetly that is the magical, the mysterious, the unexplainable key to creativity that enables, firstly Jwara to create his figurines (strange word, charged with meaning – not "carvings", or "models" or even "statuettes" – they are figurines), and then , later, when she sings for his son, the main character of the book, Toloki, to create his form of art, i.e. to draw. It is almost as though, for a man to be able to create, to be the full man, he needs a woman to sing to him. OK, so we aren't exactly in the realm of 21st Century feminist-oriented civilisation here, but the idea does fascinate me. A man needs a woman in order to unleash his full potential. Not sexually, though sex (love between man and woman) does play a role in events described.
But this is not a love story in the conventional sense, and there is no hint of a sexual relationship between the child Noria and the adult Jwara – though Jwara's wife is hideously (and perhaps forgivably) jealous of Noria's ability to "enable", or perhaps complete her husband in a way that she cannot, because she cannot sing for him. Indeed, creativity can be a most destructive force, because it is often highly impractical (doesn't put food on the table), and is thus viewed as wasted, unproductive energy. But, at the same time, those who have it are revered and, because it is, paradoxically, a highly desirable quality, because it is rare and because it defines us humans, those that don't have it are often extremely jealous of those that do, but confused and frustrated by it, too. Phew!
On another level, this is a Bildungsroman, a picaresque, journeyman's tale of a youth who leaves his village to seek his fortune in the big city and become a man. In the tradition of this genre, our very likable, honest, innocent abroad hero, Toloki, tries various professions, eventually prospering in one of them, only to lose it all by a stroke of ill luck. He finally finds his true vocation as a "Professional Mourner", selling his services at funerals by wailing and mourning for dead people, whom, and whose mourners, he never met, dead or alive. Although this profession does actually exist in southern Africa, besides the (black) comedy of it (which is enhanced by his bizarre costume that he dons for this job of work – there is more than a hint of the innocent clown, even of the buffoon, and definitely of the sad, pathetic tramp (children laugh at him), given his homeless, depressed existence), I do think there is a large slab of symbolism in this. The creative man (OK, let's be up-front here: the artist), is a man who is paid to mourn the human condition, but at the same time to bring comfort amongst the inevitability of human suffering – as the old adage says, the only thing we can be sure of in our lives, apart from the fact that we will suffer, is that one day we will die.
Art as the accompaniment to our sorrow, as well as the comforter against it. The artist as the member of society who takes on the suffering of others, but at the same time makes a living out of it. To do this requires huge sensitivity, the capacity to recognise and even draw attention to other people's sorrow and to react in a way that brings comfort but at the same time, cynically almost, brings in the money that is necessary for the artist to live on. A formidable tightrope to walk.
On another level, it is of course a love story. The story of how two children lose each other and then find each other again as adults. And it was only by dint of them having grown up together (under bizarre, stifling, but oh so human circumstances), that enabled them to find each other later, scarred by their experiences of the cruel, merciless world but still optimistic and open enough to fall in love and comfort each other in maturity. Mature love as a shelter from the storm that life has proven to be. And, of course, the woman's ability to sing for a man and thus enable him to bloom to his full potential. And the love that a man has for a woman that inspires him to build a shelter for her, and which they later share.
And what beautifully controlled language Zakes Mda uses. And how deftly he controls the plot, which moves almost in ever widening concentric circles, moving from village to city slum, from childhood to adulthood, weaving its narrative with deceptive subtlty and studding the story with larger-than-life, colourful, almost Dickensianly eccentric characters. In prose that is simple and composed in short sentences in the narrative simple present. Just to take one beautiful paragraph, almost at random (there are so many), but one which captivates for me the elusive simplicity of his prose, which then serves to deepen the meaning (the symbolism is not obscured by pompous words, rather it is made more powerful by their very simplicity). It comes at the stage in the story just after when Toloka and Noria have (re-)built their house (shack) that has been ripped down by, by what? By, primarily, vindictive, revenge-driven, misguided, human violence and evil. But then:
The sun rises on Noria's shack. All the work has been completed and the structure is a collage in bright sunny colours. And of bits of iron sheets, some of which shimmer in the morning rays, while others are rust-laden. It would certainly be at home in any museum of modern art. Toloki and Noria stand back, and gaze admiringly at it. First they smile, then they giggle, and finally they burst out laughing. Sudden elation overwhelms Toloki. Noria's laughter is surely regaining its old potency.
Goodness, there is so much of the novel in that simple but poetic paragraph (poetic in the sense that, in its sum, there is so much more in it than the mere words – shimmer; potency add poetic weight to the meaning). That creativity, even of something as prosaic as a simple shack to live in, lies at the heart of being human. That, once the creation is complete, it can and does inspire us to be joyful, to revel in our humanness (the giggling laughter). That even simple creations could and perhaps should find their homes in museums (is a novel even a kind of museum, isolating and setting out experiences and ideas (as opposed to objects) and putting them on display for all-comers as it does?). And that the best creations are ones which men and women – or perhaps a man and a woman, achieve together. And then a hint of that central theme of Noria's laughter and song as being the driving force behind a man's creativity – her enabling force.
I came to this novel looking for a book about South Africa, one which perhaps summed up the conditions for the poorer, black people there. In a way this book does this – there are graphic descriptions of the grinding township poverty and degradation under which many, many South Africans of colour lived and still do live. But I found, over and above this, a book that achieves much more (and does not have that theme, important though it is, at its centre).
It finds and shows us grace amidst the degradation, tenderness amongst the cynical hate and violence, and above all beauty and poetry in the bleak, prosaic stench of grasping humanity. In short, this book goes way beyond South Africa, to encompass and reveal the poetry that is within all of us, were we but prepared – at great personal cost, admittedly – to give vent to it.
I was deeply, deeply moved by this marvellous book.