This first novel does show some promise, but overall there were too many missteps, large and small, for me to really enjoy it. The missteps fall into a couple categories: first, problems with authorial control over the narrative, and second, aspects of the book that I object to but other readers may not.
In the first category, I had four problems with the narrative. First, Lloyd was not consistent with point of view. The book was written with an omniscient narrator that jumped from character to character all over the map. These jumps in perspective almost always were accompanied by a jump to a new scene and the reader was cued in to them by a line or chapter break. However, at random points in the narrative Lloyd also jumped to a new character within the same scene -- which is a perfectly acceptable authorial tactic, but the reader HAS to be given a clue in the first sentence of the new perspective to avoid confusion. Several times when this happened, I only caught on that he had switched perspectives after he had already switched back. Making this even more difficult was the fact that most of the characters performing actions away from the main narrative of Isak's maturation were never properly introduced or placed in their larger context. Even using the index of characters at the back (which was organized alphabetically, rather than usefully by tribe or race) I still have no clue who some of the "bad" characters are -- I don't know what tribe they belong to; I don't even know if they are human, elf, god, or some other race; I don't know if anyone else even knows of them.
Second, the characters were very inconsistent. Isak starts the novel as the requisite young boy from a humble background that is chosen by the gods and destined for great things, and he is still pretty much that same person at the end of the book -- juvenile, petulant, short-tempered. But there are about 150 pages in the middle where is a different person altogether: practical-minded, unemotional, wise, and somehow good at politics even though he states at various other points that he refuses on principle to wheeling and dealing and obeying the forms of etiquette. The whole idea of the white-eyes was very inconsistent throughout as well; they are introduced as beings created by the gods to be leaders of men, and therefore given superhuman strength, speed, size, and charm. We see the strength, speed, and size (at length), but the charm is shown exactly once at the very beginning. Now in my opinion, even in a warrior-driven culture like this one appears to be, it is the charm that would be most important in forming a leader, and the short-temper that apparently also goes along with being a white-eye would be a significant stumbling block (and therefore not one the gods would have included).
Third, the pacing was extremely uneven. There were quite a few battle scenes, and those moved along so quickly that I had trouble keeping track of what was going on; there were dialogue-driven scenes that actually were quite interesting (though I wished there was some humor in the book; I get tired of grim men doing grim things); and then there were stretches 50 pages long or more where no one was doing anything at all and I was so bored that I put the book down in the middle of a paragraph to do chores.
Fourth, the descriptive passages made little sense. There were pages and pages of descriptions of clothing and livery (and anyone who thinks that clothing is a purely female fascination is hereby disproved decidedly); the fact that Isak shaved his head was practically hammered into my brain; but I never got any sense at all for the landscape or the people. I wanted a map to fill me in on the geography (and normally I'm not a reader that pays attention to maps in books), but I doubt the publisher would have been able to find someone to draw one, because there were no clues in the text. At the end of the novel I still have no idea if the terrain was mountainous or flat, forests or plains, or even if there was any weather -- which is very peculiar, since the god most of the characters worship is the god of storms.
All those were problems that I think any reader would find with Lloyd's narrative. I found four other aspects of the narrative objectionable, but other readers may not be bothered by them.
First, Lloyd belongs to a new generation of male fantasy authors that wants to appear enlightened, but deep down is just as white-male oriented as fantasy authors of 60 years ago. He mentions that there are tribes that are brown-skinned -- but they are far away, not powers in the land, and have no actual relevance to the story. He has a female supporting character that is a trusted adviser to the hero and respected by all the other characters, and he states (as if defending himself) that intelligent women are sought out as wives by powerful men because they can run the estates and help their men succeed in politics -- but there are no women in the book. In five pages of cast list there are seven women (not counting the goddesses, who are still outnumbered by the gods and who none of the characters actually worship). There is a mention of female white-eyes, but apparently there aren't any in any of the armies. There is a mention of town whores, but even they aren't ever shown. Handily, white-eyes kill their mothers in childbirth, so Isak doesn't even have a mother to remember. A female author could never simply erase men from her worlds, but plenty of male fantasy authors still give no thought to where women would be.
Second, it is very much a black and white struggle. There are obviously evil characters -- they're the ones raising the dead and sacrificing soldiers to daemons. Everyone else is good, and what's more, everyone else agrees with each other on the proper course of action. There is no politics, despite what Isak whines about; there is absolutely no evidence that there is such a thing as dissent. Anyone that doesn't agree with what Isak and Lord Bahl believe is a traitor or a necromancer. Everyone who does agree with Isak and Lord Bahl also agrees on exactly what must be done -- no one ever thinks that maybe they are mistaken in their actions, or even misinformed in any respect. And apparently Lesarl knows everyone and everything in the world, and is completely informed as to their motivations and even what THEY know about everyone else. It's very handy to have such an effective spy network, but I've never believed one could actually exist.
Third, the mythical aspects of the world seemed rather jumbled. There were apparently elves, trolls, dragons, unicorns, harlequins, and gods, but I never got a sense for what role any of those races of beings played in the world. Were they common or uncommon? Intelligent or not? Human or not, in the case of harlequins? Actually, were the white-eyes human or not? They apparently cannot breed with regular humans, which would tend to make me think they are no longer human, but it is not something addressed in the text.
Finally, the book had absolutely no sense of humor. It is full of grim purpose, and "looming presences" as Time Out mentions, but I cannot call a world realistic if no one ever cracks a smile. Even LotR, which every fantasy author since seems to want to emulate, takes a break from its battle between good and evil to smoke a pipe, tell stories, and joke. How am I supposed to enjoy the characters when they so clearly don't enjoy themselves?
Given all this, I doubt I will be picking up any of the sequels to this novel, but ten years from now if Lloyd is still around and getting rave reviews I may try him again to see if he's gotten any better.