This book is required reading by all staff in the ELL/GED team at my site, Neighborhood House, as it is follow-up to a training that we attended last month. Bridges Out of Poverty is a controversial work that is designed to help human services professionals better assist clients who come from what Payne calls the 'culture of poverty'. It gives ideas on how to better support and understand people who have grown up in generational poverty, and how to partner with them in their transitions, such as moving from welfare to work. Payne discusses how we can work more effectively with clients as individuals, agencies and communities.
This book is relevant to my work at Neighborhood House, as almost all of my clients would be considered economically disadvantaged by US standards. As a CTEP member, my role is to help clients achieve life goals such as finding employment or a better job. Sometimes it is frustrating when clients don't keep appointments and have excuses such as some kind of drama happening to a cousin. Having been brought up in a lower middle class household where achievement and punctuality always 'trumped' family events, Payne's work taught me about the importance of relationship in the lives of people from poverty. After reading the book,I keep a lot of her advice in mind when events happen at my site that might otherwise make me feel overwhelmed.
I would recommend this book to all AmeriCorps members. However, it's important to remember that Payne's book, though useful, is not immune to criticism. Payne is European American, and she tends to write more accurately about white poverty than about the Latino, Native or African-American experience. There are many online articles out there that provide critique of her work, accusing her of stereotyping the poor and using a 'deficit model' to describe them. If anyone else is interested in reading the book, I can forward you some critical articles to look at too.
When first picking up the book ‘Bridges out of Poverty’ I was quite confronted with the content in the workbook. This tension was born out of my own understanding, as well as lack of understanding, of the implications of me and my family’s socio-economic status. Perhaps it because we have all been fed the same stale American dream tonic, leading us to believe we are all middle-class, and no how dare you call me poor! However, when describing language patterns, beliefs around money, familial structures, and even types of humor, it was quite clear that family more closely aligned with those living in poverty, than those in middle class.
One of the tenants of the book is that “many children in poverty must function as their own parents…they parent themselves and others” [111]. While it was a block at first, it actually gave me incredible insight into my own upbringing, as well as my mom and dad’s origins, and so on through the family tree. It made me understand that I was proud in a way, seeing how far two Milwaukee immigrant families can go, and impacts made, with limited cash flow and cultural barriers. The book goes into the connections between poverty culture and how it is a breeding ground for addiction – a complex issues that I find hard to boil down to socio-economic status, but the book concludes “working-class amusement is always too much. It operates from an Overdose Aesthetic” [202]. Again, how much of addiction is ‘poverty culture’ and how much is the effects of fractured families, communities and societies? A larger structural issue to be sure, but again the book is adept at trying to ‘boil it all down’ to graspable concepts. Sometimes it works, and sometimes it falls short.
I agree with the book that “the reality of poverty is the language of survival” and sometimes this survival mode clashes with the professional realm, a reality we see so often at Emerge. The book pulls from Stephen Covey’s notion of an emotional bank account, indicating energy deposits and withdrawals, again with the middle-class bank language. However it provided very tangible, practical ways to interact with ‘those in poverty’. One ‘deposit’ that I’ve observed in my service year is how far the appreciation for humor and individual personality go. While I personally believe this extends beyond those living in generational poverty, it helps with forging the initial relationship – seeing one where they are at. The book has an entire section devoted to improving internal processes, and concluding that ultimately it is not the funders or the governmental partnerships that matter most “the client must come first” [165]. I abide by this and am thankful for this inclusion.
One issue I did have with this workbook was the assumption that everyone living in poverty ‘wants’ to be middle class, upper class. The entire premise of the book was strategizing and assisting with that bridge – out of poverty. I am not saying staying in poverty is the answer; rather, I think I am alluding to the fact that perhaps the middle class is an illusion and we should all be working toward another norm, one that isn’t apparent in our hyper-exploitative capitalist economy right now. The implications are dire, if we do not choose to find another alternative – middle class is not the answer. While I agree that there are problematic behaviors born out of living in crisis mode, I do not agree that the answer lies in saving more money, not sharing and getting a mortgage. I do believe that education, recognition of self and garnering professional skills are part of the equation in alleviating associated issues with striving to make ends meet. However, this book tends to leave out the systemic analysis of why poverty even exists in the first place! It also skims over race, ethnicity, religion, gender, age and other indicators of marginalization.
This book assumes that the economy is working right now… that if we, as human service workers, ‘helped’ poor people learn how to talk ‘productively and professionally’ they could find a steady career, therefore transitioning into a middle-class livelihood and we would all be better off for it. I challenge that notion, for I believe our economy preys upon low-wage workers, particularly immigrants and people of color. Not only does this mechanism of progress exploit workers, but it harms the earth. Our economy does not serve any one but the elite, those in cahoots with military contracting, pharmaceuticals and petrochemical industries.
Ultimately, though practical and useful on one end, this book can be compared to an idealistic white social worker’s notion of how to fix the problem. Yes, it has great insight but I feel that it is forgetting to understand the structural inequality that plagues communities; thereby, forcing people to respond in any way possible. If a community living next to a crude oil refinery, breathing in pet coke dust daily, abides by this advice, does it truly change the fact that they are being systematically unjustly exploited? If they change their language patterns does it change the fact that they breathe in toxic poison? That cancer rates are skyrocketing? That the jobs are limited by the industries that dominate the city? I think not. So while helpful, I personally require a more radical, compassionate rage-fueled volume in understanding poverty.