What do you think?
Rate this book
The Printing Press as an Agent of Change
Originally published in two volumes in 1980, The Printing Press as an Agent of Change is now issued in a paperback edition containing both volumes. The work is a full-scale historical treatment of the advent of printing and its importance as an agent of change. Professor Eisenstein begins by examining the general implications of the shift from script to print, and goes on to examine its part in three of the major movements of early modern times - the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the rise of modern science.
820 pages, Kindle Edition
First published January 1, 1979
44 people are currently reading
1581 people want to read
About the author
Elizabeth L. Eisenstein
11 books15 followersElizabeth Lewisohn Eisenstein was an American historian of the French Revolution and early 19th century France. She was best known for her work on the history of early printing, writing on the transition in media between the era of 'manuscript culture' and that of 'print culture', as well as the role of the printing press in effecting broad cultural change in Western civilization.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 17 of 17 reviews
Want to read
March 17, 2009Off Clay Shirky:
Elizabeth Eisenstein’s magisterial treatment of Gutenberg’s invention, The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, opens with a recounting of her research into the early history of the printing press. She was able to find many descriptions of life in the early 1400s, the era before movable type. Literacy was limited, the Catholic Church was the pan-European political force, Mass was in Latin, and the average book was the Bible. She was also able to find endless descriptions of life in the late 1500s, after Gutenberg’s invention had started to spread. Literacy was on the rise, as were books written in contemporary languages, Copernicus had published his epochal work on astronomy, and Martin Luther’s use of the press to reform the Church was upending both religious and political stability.
What Eisenstein focused on, though, was how many historians ignored the transition from one era to the other. To describe the world before or after the spread of print was child’s play; those dates were safely distanced from upheaval. But what was happening in 1500? The hard question Eisenstein’s book asks is “What was the revolution itself like?”
Chaotic, as it turns out. The Bible was translated into local languages; was this an educational boon or the work of the devil? Erotic novels appeared, prompting the same set of questions. Copies of Aristotle and Galen circulated widely, but direct encounter with the relevant texts revealed that the two sources clashed, tarnishing faith in the Ancients. As novelty spread, old institutions seemed exhausted while new ones seemed untrustworthy; as a result, people almost literally didn’t know what to think. If you can’t trust Aristotle, who can you trust?
During the wrenching transition to print, experiments were only revealed in retrospect to be turning points. Aldus Manutius, the Venetian printer and publisher, invented the smaller octavo volume along with italic type. What seemed like a minor change — take a book and shrink it — was in retrospect a key innovation in the democratization of the printed word. As books became cheaper, more portable, and therefore more desirable, they expanded the market for all publishers, heightening the value of literacy still further.
That is what real revolutions are like. The old stuff gets broken faster than the new stuff is put in its place. The importance of any given experiment isn’t apparent at the moment it appears; big changes stall, small changes spread. Even the revolutionaries can’t predict what will happen. Agreements on all sides that core institutions must be protected are rendered meaningless by the very people doing the agreeing. (Luther and the Church both insisted, for years, that whatever else happened, no one was talking about a schism.) Ancient social bargains, once disrupted, can neither be mended nor quickly replaced, since any such bargain takes decades to solidify.
Elizabeth Eisenstein’s magisterial treatment of Gutenberg’s invention, The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, opens with a recounting of her research into the early history of the printing press. She was able to find many descriptions of life in the early 1400s, the era before movable type. Literacy was limited, the Catholic Church was the pan-European political force, Mass was in Latin, and the average book was the Bible. She was also able to find endless descriptions of life in the late 1500s, after Gutenberg’s invention had started to spread. Literacy was on the rise, as were books written in contemporary languages, Copernicus had published his epochal work on astronomy, and Martin Luther’s use of the press to reform the Church was upending both religious and political stability.
What Eisenstein focused on, though, was how many historians ignored the transition from one era to the other. To describe the world before or after the spread of print was child’s play; those dates were safely distanced from upheaval. But what was happening in 1500? The hard question Eisenstein’s book asks is “What was the revolution itself like?”
Chaotic, as it turns out. The Bible was translated into local languages; was this an educational boon or the work of the devil? Erotic novels appeared, prompting the same set of questions. Copies of Aristotle and Galen circulated widely, but direct encounter with the relevant texts revealed that the two sources clashed, tarnishing faith in the Ancients. As novelty spread, old institutions seemed exhausted while new ones seemed untrustworthy; as a result, people almost literally didn’t know what to think. If you can’t trust Aristotle, who can you trust?
During the wrenching transition to print, experiments were only revealed in retrospect to be turning points. Aldus Manutius, the Venetian printer and publisher, invented the smaller octavo volume along with italic type. What seemed like a minor change — take a book and shrink it — was in retrospect a key innovation in the democratization of the printed word. As books became cheaper, more portable, and therefore more desirable, they expanded the market for all publishers, heightening the value of literacy still further.
That is what real revolutions are like. The old stuff gets broken faster than the new stuff is put in its place. The importance of any given experiment isn’t apparent at the moment it appears; big changes stall, small changes spread. Even the revolutionaries can’t predict what will happen. Agreements on all sides that core institutions must be protected are rendered meaningless by the very people doing the agreeing. (Luther and the Church both insisted, for years, that whatever else happened, no one was talking about a schism.) Ancient social bargains, once disrupted, can neither be mended nor quickly replaced, since any such bargain takes decades to solidify.
June 23, 2017
This book, and the footnotes therein, formed many a research topic for my graduate studies looking at the history of the book and the Protestant Reformation. This book was phenomenal in helping me understand this period.
November 18, 2014
Her thesis is such a good one that her defence of it gets very dull. It would have been interesting to discuss why China missed out on the Enlightenment, given that they had the Printing press before Europe.
February 24, 2021
back to the 90s, in a good way
People in tech sometimes say we overestimate change in the short run and underestimate it in the long run. On page after page of this, I kept repeatedly thinking "oh, I've underestimated the impact of the internet on humanity" — because the book does an amazing job showing how much we underestimate the many impacts of the printing press.
(It's also long, and snarky, and yet maybe too short. I can't do it justice in this space.)
People in tech sometimes say we overestimate change in the short run and underestimate it in the long run. On page after page of this, I kept repeatedly thinking "oh, I've underestimated the impact of the internet on humanity" — because the book does an amazing job showing how much we underestimate the many impacts of the printing press.
(It's also long, and snarky, and yet maybe too short. I can't do it justice in this space.)
August 27, 2020
This book is magisterial.
Where did modern sciences come from? That's just one question which this book addresses insightfully. Our modern sense of being individuals? That's another question this book addresses. (I would suggest persons skip over Eisenstein's shorter book "The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe": Read the whole story not the synopsis (I may be wrong about this--I have not read the synopsis)! It's a long read, but it was, at least for myself, highly engaging, so this book (2 vols in 1) is if anything, still not long enough.
I note that the author said (this may have been a personal communiation to myself from her; it was now many years ago) she wanted to title this book: "The master printer as an agent of change", but the publisher did not like that so much.
How much our contemporary world could benefit from more persons like these master printers, who spent maybe half their day working and the other half engaging in study and written correspondence with other persons who were also making a difference (of course this sentence is simplistic, but I think its spirit is right). Civil society. Enlightenment. Universalizing culture. If the subject is what is honorific about modern Europe, this book, and the deployment of printed books itself, has something valuable to say about it (see: Edmund Husserl's "Vienna Lecture": "Philosophy and the Crisis of European Humanity" (1935), e.g.)
I think this book is not long enough? May I contribute to a literate community of discourse such as that of the master printers of early Modern Europe, who were among the shapers of modernity, which community of discourse would contribute to the extension!
Where did modern sciences come from? That's just one question which this book addresses insightfully. Our modern sense of being individuals? That's another question this book addresses. (I would suggest persons skip over Eisenstein's shorter book "The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe": Read the whole story not the synopsis (I may be wrong about this--I have not read the synopsis)! It's a long read, but it was, at least for myself, highly engaging, so this book (2 vols in 1) is if anything, still not long enough.
I note that the author said (this may have been a personal communiation to myself from her; it was now many years ago) she wanted to title this book: "The master printer as an agent of change", but the publisher did not like that so much.
How much our contemporary world could benefit from more persons like these master printers, who spent maybe half their day working and the other half engaging in study and written correspondence with other persons who were also making a difference (of course this sentence is simplistic, but I think its spirit is right). Civil society. Enlightenment. Universalizing culture. If the subject is what is honorific about modern Europe, this book, and the deployment of printed books itself, has something valuable to say about it (see: Edmund Husserl's "Vienna Lecture": "Philosophy and the Crisis of European Humanity" (1935), e.g.)
I think this book is not long enough? May I contribute to a literate community of discourse such as that of the master printers of early Modern Europe, who were among the shapers of modernity, which community of discourse would contribute to the extension!
April 20, 2025
Elizabeth Eisenstein’s The Printing Press as an Agent of Change is a fascinating exploration of how one invention reshaped the course of European history. She traces how the spread of printed materials influenced everything from religion to science, laying the groundwork for the Reformation and the rise of modern thought. It’s interesting to see how far printing has come since then—businesses today, like https://printingbirmingham.uk/, continue to harness the power of print to communicate ideas, promote events, and share information in impactful ways.
This book is a thoughtful and well-researched read for anyone interested in media history, cultural shifts, or the evolution of communication. Eisenstein's work shows just how deeply print has influenced the world—and why it still matters.
This book is a thoughtful and well-researched read for anyone interested in media history, cultural shifts, or the evolution of communication. Eisenstein's work shows just how deeply print has influenced the world—and why it still matters.
October 18, 2020
This book is thoroughly excellent, though it's written mainly for historians. If you're interested in how the printing press affected and still affects global movements and want to get roasted by Eisenstein as she fastidiously dismantles her contemporaries' arguments, it's worth the travel. Especially if you're at least an amateur historian yourself.
April 10, 2020
This study scrutinizes the great 16th century turning point, hinging on books whose text and illustrations—notably technical graphs—could reach more people, faster, and free of the corrosion caused by manual copying, thus sparking an explosion of collective knowledge production.
May 28, 2020
Breathtaking analysis with much food for thought and topics for further investigation.
December 28, 2023
Mi reseña en bookwyrm https://lectura.social/user/rsf92/rev...
July 17, 2025
Note to self - only read chapter relating to Protestant Revolution for my history class.
March 13, 2016
Before I read this book, I would have agreed that printing was a hugely important technology. But I had not thought very much about the details of where that effect was seen.
This is a long detailed work of history and historiography to trace why printing mattered, and to show that previous historians had understated its importance. The book is very much written to an audience of professional historians, but I was able to follow it and was enormously stimulated.
Here are a few examples of points that Eistenstein made that I hadn't thought about before.
Scholars in the late middle ages and early modern period were fully aware that there were ancient books that had gotten lost but might reappear, full of philosophical insights and lost technical knowledge. Given that background, it's no surprise that many scholars were fascinated by the occult and hermetic literature: if you didn't know any better, you might think that the lost wisdom of the Atlantean masters was just the next thing that would come back after De Rerum Naturae. Before the 14th century, there wasn't quite the same awareness just how much had been lost; you would know that your monastery didn't have something, but you wouldn't have any way of knowing whether it existed elsewhere. After the 17th century, you wouldn't expect a lot more to surface, and you'd be much more aware of the possibility of fraud.
I had never focused on the way printing revolutionized science and mathematics. Before printing, it wasn't possible to reproduce technical diagrams or large mathematical tables with sufficient accuracy; texts were copied by monks, often based on dictation. The monks were typically not technically expert, and so the illustrations were often bad or absent. In contrast, with a printed version, you could steadily improve the plates. As a result, early modern copies of Euclid were much clearer than medieval copies, and technical writers like Agricola or Vesalius could be understood much more easily.
The usual historical narrative is "Ptolemaic Astronomy went unchallenged for a thousand years and then Copernicus offered an alternative." As Eisenstein points out, hardly anybody in the medieval world had a copy of the Almagest, most of those copies wouldn't have been very good, and even if you had that, you probably didn't have many other books. Copernicus was in the first generation of astronomers who had a copy of Ptolemy, had copies of Aristotle and of ancient books with astronomical observations; as a result, he was among the first people who actually could notice some of the problems with Ptolemy. Moreover, the succeeding generation of astronomers (notably Tycho) were the first to have *two* different major astronomical works to choose from and compare. Before printing, you wouldn't have noticed the problems with Ptolemaic astronomy and wouldn't have had an alternative, with different problems, to compare it to and stimulate creativity.
This is a long detailed work of history and historiography to trace why printing mattered, and to show that previous historians had understated its importance. The book is very much written to an audience of professional historians, but I was able to follow it and was enormously stimulated.
Here are a few examples of points that Eistenstein made that I hadn't thought about before.
Scholars in the late middle ages and early modern period were fully aware that there were ancient books that had gotten lost but might reappear, full of philosophical insights and lost technical knowledge. Given that background, it's no surprise that many scholars were fascinated by the occult and hermetic literature: if you didn't know any better, you might think that the lost wisdom of the Atlantean masters was just the next thing that would come back after De Rerum Naturae. Before the 14th century, there wasn't quite the same awareness just how much had been lost; you would know that your monastery didn't have something, but you wouldn't have any way of knowing whether it existed elsewhere. After the 17th century, you wouldn't expect a lot more to surface, and you'd be much more aware of the possibility of fraud.
I had never focused on the way printing revolutionized science and mathematics. Before printing, it wasn't possible to reproduce technical diagrams or large mathematical tables with sufficient accuracy; texts were copied by monks, often based on dictation. The monks were typically not technically expert, and so the illustrations were often bad or absent. In contrast, with a printed version, you could steadily improve the plates. As a result, early modern copies of Euclid were much clearer than medieval copies, and technical writers like Agricola or Vesalius could be understood much more easily.
The usual historical narrative is "Ptolemaic Astronomy went unchallenged for a thousand years and then Copernicus offered an alternative." As Eisenstein points out, hardly anybody in the medieval world had a copy of the Almagest, most of those copies wouldn't have been very good, and even if you had that, you probably didn't have many other books. Copernicus was in the first generation of astronomers who had a copy of Ptolemy, had copies of Aristotle and of ancient books with astronomical observations; as a result, he was among the first people who actually could notice some of the problems with Ptolemy. Moreover, the succeeding generation of astronomers (notably Tycho) were the first to have *two* different major astronomical works to choose from and compare. Before printing, you wouldn't have noticed the problems with Ptolemaic astronomy and wouldn't have had an alternative, with different problems, to compare it to and stimulate creativity.
July 25, 2016
The most impeccable work of academia I have ever encountered from a female scholar. She conveys her subject matter better than does Rachel Carson; better than does Barbara W. Tuchman, better than does Margaret Meade. Better than anyone. Elizabeth L. Eisenstein reins supreme, so far in my experience. She commandeered this enormous historical topic and made it her own. Consummate professionalism.
Mark me: this is praise I do not give lightly. I generally dislike women authors; I don't usually find them competent. So for any woman to eke out a blue-ribbon from me, this means she went far beyond the distance I could reasonably ask from anybody else in the running.
But she is simply one of the best researchers out there. Phenomenal finesse. Eisenstein puts on a clinic on how to deliver precise, lucid arguments. Execution of the most thorough methodology throughout. She wallops this excruciatingly difficult, sprawling esoteric history. Wears kid gloves throughout.
This kind of book (by the way) is why I laugh at the internet for the piece-of-shit it truly is. No one raised on the internet can accomplish this kind of feat. And in the reading of it, well...this kind of book separates the dilettante web-surfer from the serious reader. You can't skate or skim your way through something this big.
Take my word for it: if you're interested (and I mean, REALLY interested) in the Middle ages, the Reformation, the Renaissance...you can almost toss aside every other work you may be considering. Forget the rest and stick with the best: Elizabeth L. Eisenstein.
Mark me: this is praise I do not give lightly. I generally dislike women authors; I don't usually find them competent. So for any woman to eke out a blue-ribbon from me, this means she went far beyond the distance I could reasonably ask from anybody else in the running.
But she is simply one of the best researchers out there. Phenomenal finesse. Eisenstein puts on a clinic on how to deliver precise, lucid arguments. Execution of the most thorough methodology throughout. She wallops this excruciatingly difficult, sprawling esoteric history. Wears kid gloves throughout.
This kind of book (by the way) is why I laugh at the internet for the piece-of-shit it truly is. No one raised on the internet can accomplish this kind of feat. And in the reading of it, well...this kind of book separates the dilettante web-surfer from the serious reader. You can't skate or skim your way through something this big.
Take my word for it: if you're interested (and I mean, REALLY interested) in the Middle ages, the Reformation, the Renaissance...you can almost toss aside every other work you may be considering. Forget the rest and stick with the best: Elizabeth L. Eisenstein.
February 7, 2015
An authentic historical account of role of printing presses in early-modern Europe
In book "The Printing Press as an Agent of Change" author Elizabeth L. Eisenstein narrates theoretical and practical dimensions of communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe. This book is divided into three parts: (p.1) Introduction to an elusive transformation, (p.2) Classical and Christian traditions reoriented; Renaissance and reformation reappraised, (p.3) The book of nature transformed. This book contains specific chapters on aspects of history of printing technologies in early-modern Europe. Printing presses helped the European Christian missionaries to spread Christianity, biblical thoughts and philosophies in continents across Asia, Africa and Latin America. This book also narrates anecdotes of formation of scientific societies and royal academies across the European countries for strengthening scientific research.
In book "The Printing Press as an Agent of Change" author Elizabeth L. Eisenstein narrates theoretical and practical dimensions of communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe. This book is divided into three parts: (p.1) Introduction to an elusive transformation, (p.2) Classical and Christian traditions reoriented; Renaissance and reformation reappraised, (p.3) The book of nature transformed. This book contains specific chapters on aspects of history of printing technologies in early-modern Europe. Printing presses helped the European Christian missionaries to spread Christianity, biblical thoughts and philosophies in continents across Asia, Africa and Latin America. This book also narrates anecdotes of formation of scientific societies and royal academies across the European countries for strengthening scientific research.
February 7, 2015
An authentic historical account of role of printing presses in early-modern Europe
In book "The Printing Press as an Agent of Change" author Elizabeth L. Eisenstein narrates theoretical and practical dimensions of communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe. This book is divided into three parts: (p.1) Introduction to an elusive transformation, (p.2) Classical and Christian traditions reoriented; Renaissance and reformation reappraised, (p.3) The book of nature transformed. This book contains specific chapters on aspects of history of printing technologies in early-modern Europe. Printing presses helped the European Christian missionaries to spread Christianity, biblical thoughts and philosophies in continents across Asia, Africa and Latin America. This book also narrates anecdotes of formation of scientific societies and royal academies across the European countries for strengthening scientific research.
In book "The Printing Press as an Agent of Change" author Elizabeth L. Eisenstein narrates theoretical and practical dimensions of communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe. This book is divided into three parts: (p.1) Introduction to an elusive transformation, (p.2) Classical and Christian traditions reoriented; Renaissance and reformation reappraised, (p.3) The book of nature transformed. This book contains specific chapters on aspects of history of printing technologies in early-modern Europe. Printing presses helped the European Christian missionaries to spread Christianity, biblical thoughts and philosophies in continents across Asia, Africa and Latin America. This book also narrates anecdotes of formation of scientific societies and royal academies across the European countries for strengthening scientific research.
August 21, 2008
A MONUMENT! Eisenstein manages to take three major early modern fields of development and ratchet them around the invention of the printing press. Humanism, the Reformation, and the Scientific Century all get held to a new order. What's most interesting to me is the Burkhardt enthusiasm for the individual intellect she's a little critical of (probably because his enthusiasm was mainly for Italians) is actually supported by her thoughts on the press, and the press's democratizing aspect.
Currently reading
November 1, 2010the tiniest start to a book-group...
Displaying 1 - 17 of 17 reviews