This book is written by a journalist who has a complicated family relationship with Central Asia and is composed of eight relatively independent reports. The second chapter talks about the drug problem in Central Asia, the third and eighth chapters talk about Uzbekistan, and the rest mainly talk about Kyrgyzstan. It's okay to look at it separately, but it feels a little out of balance when combined.
The drug problem started in Afghanistan’s poppy fields and spread endlessly.
In 2001, Afghan farmers planted 8,000 hectares of opium poppies. Nearly ten years after the invasion of the West, the poppy cultivation area has expanded more than 15 times. Just looking at this data can't help but suspect that the US military went to poor Afghanistan to buy drugs. In fact, the West began to think that as long as the insurgents were cracked down, the drug problem would be solved naturally. Later they may find that it is too difficult to occupy this country, let alone govern it.
The anti-narcotics sergeant’s monthly salary is about ninety dollars, and the one kilogram of heroin he arrested for the drug dealers is asking for more than nine hundred dollars. Even if you can find a few clean and self-conscious police chiefs, you can't resist the others to help smuggle drugs in the face of huge profits.
It seems more realistic to start with poppy farmers. "The government promised to provide cash, equipment, fertilizer, tractors, and seeds, but they didn't keep their promises." Farmers who switched to growing wheat found that drug dealers were more trustworthy. The government is corrupt and incompetent, unable to deliver subsidies, and orders alone cannot prevent farmers from growing poppies. The drug dealer not only provided poppy seeds, but also told the farmers how much to plant and provided a large advance payment.
The Kyrgyz problem is endless revolution. The government that came to power after the Tulip Revolution quickly corrupted, and the president's family looted the country's wealth. The only good news is that the president did not choose to fight to the end in the next revolution, which will inevitably lead to large-scale bloodshed and even civil war. However, the young man who slayed the dragon quickly turned into an evil dragon. The new president repeated the same mistakes and stepped down due to corruption. Chaos in the revolution is unavoidable. Day-day robbery severely disrupts order, while conspiracy assassination is even more terrible, leading to a situation where bad money drives out good money without a solution to chaos. People with political ideals are unwilling to seek refuge in foreign powers such as China, the United States, and Russia, and they will inevitably fall into a disadvantage when competing for resources.
Uzbekistan’s problem is just the opposite. There is no revolution, and the dictatorship is massacring unscrupulously. Europe and the United States demanded an independent investigation, and the Uzbek President directly expelled the Americans from the air base. A few years after sanctions were imposed, the United States had sought to turn aside the issue of human rights because of the war in Afghanistan. Most of the human rights fighters were suppressed, leaving one or two to decorate the facade. As soon as the international accusations came, they publicized how he would not die if there were no human rights here. Human rights organizations cannot obtain official resources in such a country and can only rely on foreign donations.
After the Arab Spring turned into the Arab Winter, I heard people say that we would prefer the old order rather than disorder. First of all, we have to admit that the results of Arab changes have been bad, democracy and freedom have not been obtained, and they have fallen into chaos and turmoil. Secondly, it should be explained that this change may have many kinds of results, but the reality is not the result that people want. We cannot choose Uzbekistan’s stagnant pool just because Kyrgyzstan’s situation is not as good as before. If you ask the Afghans whether to choose Taliban rule or US military rule, this is not a fair question. There must be a third option. Uzbekistan has always been desperate, while Kyrgyzstan hopes that disappointment alternates. Sometimes people still have to live on hope, no matter how slim the hope is.
Central Asia is currently the battlefield of the game between China, the United States and Russia. There is not much attention to China in the book. What impressed me most was that China nominated the "Manas" epic to be included in the "Representative List of Human Intangible Cultural Heritage", which caused strong dissatisfaction with Kyrgyzstan. China stated that the nomination is because it represents the Kyrgyz minority living in China. This reason is ridiculous, as if Koreans nominated the Dragon Boat Festival because it represents the minority of Chinese in Korea. Because such a false name triggers diplomatic disputes, one can't help but worry about the outcome of China in this big game.