This review applies to the first two books in this series. Irving deals with some interesting themes, but they make the character extremely limited and annoying. She builds her own walls and then slams her head against them, and that is hard to put up with as a reader. We all know people who do that, but I also find them hard to put up with as friends. I mean, eventually, you want those walls to come down and for them to deal with their issues. But sometimes it can be hard to hang in there and watch that head bruising over and over.
The character has many reasons for her patterns, such as a crappy childhood, PTSD, and her boots strap ethos (just another way of building arbitrary walls that can strain her options). We all have blind spots due to where we grew up and how we grew up, but it would be nice. If the character had a little more insight. The reason I’m spending any time at all on this review for a crime novel is that the experience of PTSD is realistically portrayed. And then the second book she does break down at least one wall and go to therapy, which does help her. So I liked how that was illustrated for others who may be building similar walls.
But by the end of the second book, you know that she’s never gonna break that silly mic drop pattern (or the overuse of italics, including identifying a speaker w their italicized name—if she tried it without them, she might see how silly they seem).
Also, given the title of the series, I expected the dog to be a K-9 police dog.
So I lost interest, including in what might’ve been a very compelling sequel in which the character’s childhood and its impact were more deeply examined. I don’t like being treated like a moron. Also both books illustrated a pattern, which is this disturbing need to identify compassion as pity (the terms are used interchangeably) and the repetitive pattern of betrayal trauma, which includes the bad guy [spoiler]
——————————
being a close friend and combat comrade.