Penetrate the secrecy and lies to learn the shocking truth …
Are you really free? Why is there so much dysfunction in our world? Is there a hidden force behind politics pushing a deeper agenda? Where is humanity headed? And what can you possibly do about it?
With comprehensive dot-connecting, Makia Freeman ties together the numerous threads of the worldwide conspiracy to show how various sinister people and organizations are all working towards the same end – the establishment of a totalitarian, militaristic One World Government (which would be both fascist and Communist, since there is no meaningful difference between the two in terms of freedom for those living under such regimes). The conspirators aiming to create this nightmare scenario call it the New World Order. Learn how seemingly innocent movements are in fact underpinned by malevolent motivations. This book names the names and uncovers the facts, drawing upon declassified documents and whistleblower testimony, to show just how scarily advanced this dark agenda already is.
However, there is time to stop it. Painting the picture of what’s going on is one thing, and focusing on the way out of it is another. This book skillfully covers both the problem and the solution, revealing the way for us to combat this nefarious plot and restore truth, peace and freedom to the world. Get ready to go deep down the rabbit hole, pierce the veil of deception and leave no stone unturned to discover the truth of what is happening on Earth – and to realize what you can do about it.
Another book asserting a world-controlling conspiracy. But, as with other books in the conspiracy genre, it makes a lot of claims without providing appropriate evidence.
For example, the book opens by asserting that the NWO (New World Order) conspiracy is led by the world’s elite who are all genetically related to each other. Really? What is the evidence that elites like Bill Gates and Elon Musk (etc_ are all genetically related to each other?
One of the problematic features of the book is that where it does cite authorities and sources, they are often controversial figures. To take examples from near the beginning and end of the book, David Icke is cited (1%) and Dennis Lee is cited (87%). But both figures are controversial, as there are people who dismiss their claims as being pseudoscience. This means that they if the author chooses to cite controversial figures like that, then the author should also present an argument which addresses and justifies discounting the claims against those figures. But no argument is presented and so there is no reason to accept points in the book based on the comments of controversial individuals.
Another set of issues opens up with the interpretation of history. We are told that the US invasion of Guatemala in 1954 was an attempt to prop up the United Fruit Company (1%). But, an alternative explanation would refer to Guatemala’s support for communists. Fair enough if the author wants to interpret history differently to how it is conventionally interpreted, but there needs to be evidence and argument to justify doing so. Yet none is provided.
Another example of dubious history concerns the claim that Hitler is alleged to have escaped world war II and gone to South America. The book claims that the fragments of Hitler’s skull preserved in Moscow are fake (12%). But those fragments convinced Stalin. So, where is the peer reviewed scientific reports to justify this new claim that those fragments are in fact fake?
Throughout the book, questionable scientific claims are made. For example fluoride in the water is written off as ‘it has nothing to do with dental health whatsoever’ (3%). Yes there are arguments about how effective fluoride is, and whether its side effects can justify its use. But how and why does the author think that it really has nothing at all to do with dental healthy? In Chapter 12 further claims are made about water, oxygen, GM crops, but again where is the peer reviewed scientific evidence to justify those claims?
When the book does present evidence, it cites documents which historians have claimed to be fake. This includes the famous example of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (7%). Fair enough if the author wants to take a different position on that document, than mainstream professional historians take. But no credible evidence is presented for thinking that the document is not the (anti-semitic) fake which historians have previously written it off as.
Overall, there are just too many repetitions of previously unjustified conspiracy theories, with no reasonable evidence or argument provided in this book to accept them. Not a book to be recommended.