In an attempt to be organized:
What I liked: ...
What I disliked: Characters. Plot. Dialogue Revelations.
Let me start with Veronica Speedwell, our main character and narrator. In the first 9 pages, we find that what she calls being "blunt" is really the rudest and most offensive way to say what's on her mind. There are many ways to say, 'no, I won't marry their father whom I don't know and become the mother to his six children' that isn't "'Mrs. Clutterthorpe, I can hardly think of any fate worse than becoming the mother of six. Unless perhaps it were the plague, and even then I am persuaded a few disfiguring buboes and possible death would be preferable to motherhood.'" Followed by other insults disguised as "bluntly honest." A fine introduction to the narrator of this entire book.
Now, the idea of this book is that the last connection Miss Speedwell has to England, her Aunt who is not at all related to her, has died and she is about to go abroad to catch butterflies since she is a Lepidopterist and Scientist. However, her trip is aborted when, to quote the dust jacket summary of this book, she "thwarts her own abduction" and meets a mysterious older German gentleman who claims to have known her mother. This German gentleman leaves her with a surly taxidermist, promising to come back and reveal Speedwell's parentage, but is murdered. The rest of the book is Speedwell and the taxidermist, Stoker, trying to unravel the murder and how it's related to Miss Speedwell.
I must say though, Veronica Speedwell does NOT thwart her own abduction. The German gentleman, Baron Maximilian von Stauffenbach, does. In fact, Veronica nearly ASSISTS her own abduction by rushing into her obviously broken-into cottage to confront the person who is still in the house! And upon finding the person and realizing he is huge, admitting that she underestimated her opponent (she couldn't even see him! how could she even make an estimate of this person?!). But then she runs after him and confronts him. He grabs her arm and it's only when Maximilian holds up a revolver to the person...so, that's in the first 15 pages.
And what does our lovely, kind, well-mannered narrator do upon meeting a taciturn taxidermist by the name of Stoker? She spends most of the page trying to one-up him (he mockingly offers her a cigar, she declines, saying his are inferior tobacco and pulls our her own cigarollo), point out his mistakes (pointing out a label mistake on butterfly, literally one of the first things out of her mouth), and educate him on how to get expeditions. It's really condescending, and she seems to think that she's being compassionate and helpful. "'I suppose it was expected that you would lose your nerve.'" SO KIND. Reading though this part was excruciating. It took me HOURS to go 30 pages. And she's found her second opportunity to talk about her sex life. It's great and all that she doesn't live by the rigid morality of the time, but when she spends a good bit of time explaining why she doesn't ever enter onto an affair with an Englishman because it's on native soil and rumor could get out and society isn't forgiving, it makes me side-eye each time she spills about her sexcapades. Its amounts to the same thing she's trying to avoid! Not to mention she supposedly doesn't care about society or what they think of her!
Quick side note: Veronica Speedwell is Unconventional, Unfeminine, Odd, Peculiar, Unique, Astonishing, Intelligent, a Scientist, a Lepidopterist, Eccentric, Self-Taught, Intellectually Free, Shocking, Original, Unusual, etc. These are important traits in her. She's Been Around The World on expeditions and had several Lighthearted Affairs (I really don't care that she has, its just her whole attitude about it is contradictory to her rules! And she likes to throw them in people's faces). One of these affairs may or may not have been with a Corsican Bandit that attempted to either marry or murder her, and taught her to defend herself. He's mentioned no less than FIVE times. He must be a favorite. (I have formed two lists for her while reading. The "OF COURSE she is" list and the "List of Adjectives")
There's also the whole bit where Speedwell says "'We are, as a gender, undereducated and infantilized to the point of idiocy.'" On the next page she says, "The men there were not half so tiresome as the ladies who arrange the flowers'". WHY spout feminist arguments only to go and side against the rest of your gender? Ugh.
Moving on the Stoker, the taxidermist. Also the expeditionist. And natural historian. And gentleman. And reader of romantic poetry, tattooed, eyepatch-ed, scarred by a jaguar, navy surgeon, conjurer, and knife thrower. I can refer to him by many titles, and still be only referring to him. His full name is Revelstoke Templeton-Vane. And he is full of revelations. I forget how old he is, but no more than 32. Yet has been in a traveling show 3x, once in his childhood, which is weird as he is born into a gentleman's family. And for the first half of this novel, I was convinced that he was some unformed, unfinished foil of a character existing only to heighten Veronica's intelligence by the reader's estimation. I think he was better fleshed out by the end. I think. (I formed a list for Stoker too. The "Of Course he is/did" list)
And any other character in this book is either: a two-dimensional stock character (the jealous dancer from the traveling show) or falls under Veronica's supposed charm. And they all feel like Stoker did at first, meaning that they exist to accentuate Veronica's intelligence. Sometimes Stoker's as well.
I think I've covered characters. Moving on: Plot. It dragged for about 150 pages or so. There was no advancement in trying to figure out the cause and the murderer behind the murdered German baron. Just pages and pages of Stoker and Veronica bickering, one-upping, etc. And a traveling show. Just because.
Dialogue Revelations. This is not something that I talk about in every book. I've actually not encountered it before at all. And I truly dislike it. I cannot be convinced that saving character revelations or the process of deductive reasoning being reserved for dialogue only is a way to make the characters smart. So many revelations that are thrust upon readers happen not during Veronica's internal narrative, but when she is talking aloud. Same with Stoker. Like that Veronica had malaria. We don't find out until Stoker confronts her (in dialogue, of course). Or how Veronica knew that Stoker actually came from an aristocratic family--his boots and vowel pronunciation. Or Veronica witnessed Krakatoa (Of Course she did). Or her parentage, which is all written in documents. The author could have chosen to have Veronica see it upon the page and SHARE that part with readers, but instead we know Veronica reads it and its shocking, but we don't know WHO or WHAT until she hands it to Stoker so he can read ALOUD (see: dialogue). All revealed in dialogue. It's kind of annoying, and it feels like a cheap device to amplify shock value and/or prolong suspense and anticipation.
Speaking of both plots and dialogue revelations, Stoker and Veronica spend a good deal of time trying to discern motives for the murder of the baron. And so much time has been spent trying to establish that the characters are Intelligent that it just seems absurd that they cannot see the obvious link between the murder of the baron and Veronica. I'm convinced this is also a device to try and make the plot last longer. (And Veronica spends an embarrassingly long time denying that she is related to the whole affair despite her Intellectual Prowess. Her reasoning in the end? Miss World Traveler Scientist Lepidopterist Astonishingly Unfeminine Unconventional Unusual Speedwell thinks herself Not Very Interesting. <--- WTF I CANNOT HANDLE THIS)
I do not know if I covered everything that bothers me about this book. It's hard to say because I couldn't keep track. I can say, though, that the ending was extremely fitting for this rather extreme book. Is that a plus? I don't know.
BTW, name-dropping does not convince me that a character is smart. Using a feminist argument that is modern in today's world for a character in 1887 London does not convince me a character is smart. Having a character admit to being abducted numerous times and is still alive and unharmed does not convince me a character is smart.
My favorite part: "He shook his head as if to clear it. 'I smoked opium once. It felt like listening to you...'" He's referring to Veronica.