I hate to give The Butcher and the Wren such a low rating because I think it has great potential, but it's just not quite there.
If somehow you've stumbled onto this book and you haven't heard of the author's podcast (Morbid; definitely check it out), let me say that I know Alaina can tell a story. Yes, taking facts and discussing them is different than writing a story that's completely fictitious, but Alaina is great at narrative nonfiction, and that ability mostly extends to her ability to write fiction. That being said, her debut novels needs some work.
In one of the episodes of the podcast, either Alaina or her cohost, Ashleigh, talks about seeing a ghost woman who 'didn't have a body; she was just made of bones,' and oddly enough, I feel like that is the perfect description of The Butcher and the Wren. The story is there, but it desperately needs to be fleshed out to be a real winner. The characters don't have any depth, and I have no idea of their motivations for 95% of their actions. I didn't connect with any of them because there wasn't really anything with which to relate; Wren, the main character, has her work as a forensic pathologist, and that's about it. There are a bare minimum of scenes with her doing anything outside of work, and even those scenes have her talking about her work. We do eventually get more of her story with the twist--which is actually really good--but even that isn't enough to make her feel like a real character. Likewise with the serial killer; his actions are explained by the basic "he wanted to know what it felt like for things to die" motivation, which wasn't enough for me. The setting feels generic as well. The story is meant to be set in New Orleans, but other than visiting St. Louis Cemetery No. 1, the setting could be any hot, swampy place near a big city with music festivals, bars, and tarot card readers.
The writing itself has pros and cons. There are a lot of short sentences which make the writing feel choppy, and the chapters are short, too. While I liked the alternating points of view, each chapter is so short that there wasn't time to get back into one character's head before jumping back to the other. This back-and-forth would've worked for a few big scenes (the climax, for example) to keep up the suspense, but the entire book being written this way just made me frustrated. There's also a lot of telling instead of showing. For example, during an autopsy, we're blatantly told that it's hard to snap through a clavicle, whereas we would've learned the same thing having to read about Wren struggling to cut through the bone. That being said, the plethora of details are great, although they sometimes feel a bit much, almost as if Alaina, who works as an autopsy technician, is throwing in everything she knows just because she can. Some detail is appreciated; too much detail just feels like showing off.
The ending is probably the most frustrating thing of all. We get to the big showdown, and the story just stops. Like, right-out cuts off, like we're missing an epilogue. The ending is obviously setting things up for a sequel, but I like when books in a series have some resolution of that book's specific plot while also leaving some loose threads for the next book to pick up. There's no resolution here, and it's quite unsatisfying.
All in all, The Butcher and the Wren has the potential to be a thrilling book with a really great twist, but as it is, it feels more like an early draft that's waiting for the story to be fleshed out.