In her seminal “Capitalizing on Crisis,” Greta Krippner probably explained it best: promises were made and delivered to the peoples of the western world after WWII that became increasingly difficult to keep, as post-war growth slowed down, leading to a series of crises of the state, perhaps culminating in The Great Financial Crisis. (And possibly not yet, if you ask me!)
While it took a financial crisis for us to acknowledge the overall crisis of the state, the demographic part of the problem was already a very popular topic of discussion around the turn of the millennium. Some, like Huntington, worried about the effects of changing demographics on society; many more about the effect on markets; others about the effect on private and public entitlements such as pensions.
So it’s no coincidence that, just as the crisis was about to erupt, two books by solid authors appeared in 2008 to discuss the aging of our society: George Magnus gave us “the Age of Aging” and legendary author of “How Genius Failed,” Roger Lowenstein, came out with “While America Aged.”
Very much unlike its author, Magnus’ work lacks “soul,” but it has hardly aged! Ten years later, it remains a tremendous reference.
In an important way, Lowenstein’s “While America Aged” decidedly has: GM hit the rocks (and the headlines) as far back as 2005 and washed itself clean of its past in the first half of Obama’s term. The travails of the Transport Workers Union in New York and the accounting shenanigans in San Diego are no longer news either. The Wikipedia entry for the TWU has not really been updated since 2006 as far as I can tell.
In short, “While America Aged” is compelling journalism and makes for some very interesting reading, but is never going to be a reference on pensions, on aging or on labor negotiations.
On the other hand, Lowenstein is a brilliant author who’s left no stone unturned in these three investigations. You are there, sitting with the negotiators. You get everybody’s background, from the UAW’s founder Reuther and the TWU’s founder Quill, all the way to modern-day gladiators Toussaint and Kalikow. The bits of the book that cover the strikes and the all-night negotiations are impossible to put down and who cares if the echo of those events is lost in time?
More to the point, the book exposes you very clearly to two undeniable facts that might elude a more dispassionate discussion:
1. Pensions are a legitimate entitlement. They do not draw their legitimacy from the sacrifices or the struggles that labor had to go through to obtain them; rather, they represent a necessity and they benefit both the direct beneficiaries (the retirees) and their employers, who would otherwise never grant these pensions.
2. Unfeasibly large entitlements are borne of a negotiation where an important party is not represented: those who will be called to pay for them. Both the grantor and the potential recipient of the pension must therefore share the blame for a negotiation where both can claim victory for having pushed the weight of an agreement to a future generation.
Finally, much as Lowenstein is very much a business journalist and rather disinclined to side with labor, it was very interesting to see him explain that business is not as well-suited as the government to insure society against bad health and old age (and to credit Reuther, a labor union leader, for pioneering that thought.)
In summary, this is not only a fun book, but one that brings to light, through the profiles of weak people (corrupt San Diego fireman Saathof springs to mind), the human fallibility and weakness that often lands us with unfeasibly large promises.
As a supplement to a more complete book on entitlements and aging, I recommend it highly.