Did I read the same book the other reviewers read??
I love Julia Heaberlin's books--Paper Ghosts, and We're All the Same in the Dark were 5-star reads for me. And the premise? A psychic who sees ghosts teams up with police to find a missing child? 100% I'm in.
But I very closely hated this.
First, there are real murder cases referenced in these pages, some by victims' names. It's not to bring awareness of those real-life cases, but to show the reader how hip the characters are when it comes to famous true crime cases. I'm fine when a book mentions a case to bring more awareness to it, but calling a fictional character the "Texas JonBenet" is not okay in my book. Expoliting real families and victims feels gross, and that's what we have here.
Second, the main character. I liked her, at first...but then she likes to think and talk about how smart she is, only second to her sister, who is the smartest in the world. Vivi is also a scientist and hates when people call her a psychic. Okay, that's fair. She's so smart that she can judge everyone, from moms she doesn't know to single mothers of kids with special needs to public figures to people who listen to these figures. She's not part of any of these groups she likes to judge, but is still happy to do so because....science?
Third, the prose. If the first two reasons don't make you nauseous, the purple prose might. Gems like, "I started fading from the public eye like a pastel dream," left me thinking, "What the actual heck?" The book is FILLED with these. Does the author not know what a pastel dream is? Who knows? All I know is if I had a dollar for every time a star was compared to a diamond, I'd have enough to recoup the credit I spent for this book.
If you're still here, you should know the book is also predictable. I'm fine with a predictable story if the writing is strong and the characters are interesting. Spoiler alert: They're not. Another gripe, there's a ton of Texas and conservative bashing here. If that'll upset or bore you, this book isn't for you. Also, if you hate token diverse throw-away characters, pass on this one. I want to read diverse characters in my books. Token characters are easy to identify and forget. Dont include minorities if it's just to check a box, as a minority, I find it insulting. It's very much like the editor said, "You don't have any X characters" and so they inserted one line to check that box off.
Furthermore, this book hasn't aged well. It pokes fun of conspiracies that are, in real life, unfolding to actually having some truth...and it references the Queen of England like she's still alive. It's been almost a year, but they couldn't update that??
**SPOILERS**
THE WORST thing about Vivi is that she's in love with her sister's husband. The relationship she has with her sister is sooo unbelievable (I say this as a sister and understanding every relationship is different). I couldn't stop my eyes from rolling or cringing as Vivi's sister told her how special and wonderful she is, and she should just sleep with her husband. Vivi wants to...even starts making out until she gets caught by a colleague. So gross.
But it gets worse.
Throughout the book, we're told (literally told, no showing here...lots of telling) how dark and possibly evil one character is. Vivi thinks he might be a murderer. A MURDERER. So, of course, she jumps into bed with him when he answers the door in a towel because he's just so...hot? After he leaves his house, she starts to look for evidence that he's a serial killer and thinks she finds it and oh no, not after "making the most perfect love to him." Whaaaat?
It gets even worse after that, but if you're still reading this, I'll let you find out or decide now to save your time and money and skip this one.
Just all around gross.
#bigdisappointment