*Thank you to Netgalley, the publisher, and the author for providing me with an early copy in exchange for an honest review.*
This is what I get when I take reviews at face value: disappointment.
I’ll only touch briefly on the mystery itself. I did not guess who did it, mostly because I never actively try to solve mysteries (that’s just how I read mysteries), and because I wanted everyone to die, so what’s the point in guessing when I know I’ll be further disappointed? The reveal would be a bit more convincing if I could see these people interacting with each other and if they had personalities, because as it is, finding out that Generic Flesh-sack No. 5 did it is underwhelming on all fronts. Woo-hoo, I guess?
If I was supposed to like the MC, I did not get the memo. She is helpless, annoying, bitchy, self-centered and a little…well, clueless. She also says that she’s a liar, which is strange because she still comes across as incompetent. If you lie, why would you portray yourself as hopeless? And if you’re such a liar, why are you seemingly determined to not come across as likable? And why is she so exquisitely clumsy that she legit falls to the floor when she trips on her own shoe? It takes skill to be that uncoordinated, I’ll give her that.
The difficulties she has with her sister Harper could maybe have been interesting. But I do not get the logic of, “I want to be an author, but because my sister got to it first, now I can’t publish a book.” Like, why? If you’ve got a book to write, write it and to hell with what your sibling is doing. Their relationship is (I’m pretty sure) supposed to be solid. But they can’t communicate on basic levels and Harper is a slave to the MC’s whims. And they live together, so how did their troubles remain hidden for so long? Also, GROW UP.
As for the other characters, I have never come across an ensemble cast that is so forgettable. But they’re not just forgettable, I had trouble separating them while I was reading. Isabella and Allison are so bland, it took me a really long time to tell them apart, and I was only able to by their names. I challenge anyone reading this book to give me strong descriptions of those two, and throw in Emily while you’re at it. Just for the fun of it, add Harper too. I can define them by their association/job, but their personalities are unavailable.
And the guys! Normally it’s easy to find at least one guy in a large cast that I like. Not so here. There’s Connor, whom Eleanor (that’s the MC’s name, in case you forgot, like I did) describes as a handsome asshole, and who is actually an asshole. I thought it might be a Mr. Darcy situation. But no. He’s an asshole. My reaction to someone trying to kill him is, “Get on with it already.”
Oliver is the other main guy and he could also die, for all I care. And let’s not forget Guy, who is just a guy, from what I gathered. One of the footnotes actually draws attention to the fact that Guy hasn’t been given a backstory.* I suspect it’s because the author couldn’t be bothered to write one.
Seriously, all these characters are either blank slates or unlikable. It’s actually kind of impressive.
The location of Italy is entirely wasted. I’ve never been there, but the descriptions provided here do not make me feel like I’m in a foreign country. Change the names and it could pass for California.
The writing itself is readable, mostly. I know this is an ARC, but I could’ve used more dialogue tags because it’s kinda hard to tell who’s talking when no one has a distinct voice. And some of the back-and-forth bits go on for just too long, so I had to backtrack to check who’s talking.
I read this whole book at night just before I went to sleep and maybe it’s because my brain was winding down, but I don’t think I genuinely smiled once. (When I’m reading with no one around, I never laugh out loud.** For a book that’s being promoted as “funny,” I imagine that’s a bit of a problem. It’s especially bad since I’m not that hard to amuse.***
One major problem that may not be a problem, depending on how you read the book, are the footnotes. Now, one of the first footnotes says that they are optional.**** But being a bit of a completionist, (and I’d have to pass them anyway on my Kindle), I read them. This is where Eleanor really comes across as annoying, pitiful, resentful and plain unlikable. It also dates the book to a distracting degree. I mean, it references the third Ant-Man movie, which isn’t even a year old and it’s already been forgotten. The notes (and the book proper) also mention Bridgerton, The White Lotus, Only Murders in the Building, BookTok, and actors who may not be a thing in a couple years. Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t want contemporary books to be quite so easily carbon-dated.
To summarize, if this hadn’t been an ARC, I would not have finished it.
* I’m fairly sure this is true, but I couldn’t find the spot in the book, so maybe I imagined the whole thing.
** Unless it’s Terry Pratchett, P. G. Wodehouse or just some absolutely brilliant bit of dialogue.
*** Which is not the case with the other reviewers, who all seemed to die of laughter while reading this book.
**** Much like mine are.