This trilogy by G. S. Jennsen is built on the premise that people with fused biological and artificial intelligence can create a superior society due to that kind of individual’s capacity for improvement. Improvement is rewarded as 21st c Earthlings reward it (with money and the adulation of others, to say nothing of personal contentment.) Novelist Jennsen invents Asterions to illustrate this premise.
At the beginning of the trilogy a strange metallic alien culture (the Rasu) has threatened annihilation of all Asterions, unless its leaders don’t continually send them more and more individuals for Rasu experimentation. The protagonists among the Asterions are primarily Nika, a former ambassador and advisor to Asterion leaders but now a rebel, and her sidekick Dashiel, an industrialist. Nika is a gorgeous 700,000 years old, and Dashiel is a later generation version of one of her original lovers.
The improvement of individual Asterions depends on their choices of goals and physical augmentations. They have ample time to improve themselves, since sickness seems to be eradicated and cells renewed instead of aging. Physical augmentations or upgrades do not appear to include any to the brain, but if an Asterion wants to become the best slicer (hacker), he buys a new ten-fingered arm, and a rebel such as Nika gets an implanted knife in her wrist. And so on.
The five leaders of the Asterions began as ‘ordinary’, but over the 700,000 years of their lives they have gained so much knowledge that they decided their biological brains were incapable of holding it all, and so they’ve rejected bodies in favor of pure artificial intelligence. They are so smart that, in the eight years since encountering the ‘undefeatable’ Rasu, they have done nothing except to devise ways of delivering more and more living Asterions to these aliens. (SPOILER ALERT: When the Asterion leadership is overthrown, it takes ordinary Asterions -- who are different from the leaders only in that they have biological bodies -- just a few days to come up with the solution to the Rasu problem. To support her own original premise for the book, Jennsen might have devised a biologically-based individualistic kind of solution, but sadly, it's all tech. As well, the solution needed too many people and concepts that weren't built in earlier in the trilogy. A good editor would have helped here. SPOILER ENDS.)
When endless time is available and examples of near-perfection (Nika) exist in a society that uses only certain kinds of physical augmentation to improve themselves, there is no obvious reason why everyone isn’t like Nika. I was bothered by this from the moment I understood Jennsen’s premise. Sadly, Jennsen ignores this problem, presumably assuming that her readers will be needy enough that they will unquestioningly enjoy discovering what it’s like to be better than everyone else, the way Nika is.
The original concept of this book demanded serious attention to world building. The author has done very little. Asterions do not act any differently from ordinary 21st c Earth humans. They drink to drown their sorrows; they celebrate by speechifying and drinking a lot, while devouring bags of chips and bowls of peanuts and sandwiches and potatoes; they buy designer pant suits to impress; they change their hairdo to suit their mood; they occasionally look at paintings and sculpture, or destroy them; they have events that are called cocktail parties or bigger ones where you can actually buy stuff from booths while drinking and dancing; they are said to prank one another and commit acts of revenge. Meanwhile, Jennsen doesn’t even bother to invent new slang for them, and so they use words like ‘hot’ and ‘cock’ the way your friends next-door might.
Sex is as good as Jennsen’s 21st century imagination can make it, which means no technique or appendage has been added or improved on in 700,000 years (despite all the intriguing possibilities). When an Asterion’s beloved enters the room their hearts still ‘stop’ and they ‘forget how to breathe’ whether they’ve been together as a couple only a few days or for hundreds of thousands of years. They hate, kiss, get jealous, throw recriminations, weep, and demand. No one has learned a thing about relationships despite their vast age. And although Nika is the superior Asterion while female, in this society men still throw women against walls and have to ‘earn the right to protect’ the women they love.
There are so many possibilities for potential newness in creating a people who have vast amounts of time as well as an incredible technology. There is no reason why they should feel like gadget- bearing Earthlings who live a very long time but somehow don’t ever say “What are we here for?” or “I’m bored.”
Worse, the author creates logical contradictions with the few non-human concepts she does invent. She tells us firmly that Asterions do not procreate. She means, they do not have children. They can improve themselves through augmentation, thus creating a new ‘generation’ of each individual to replace the old. Obviously their numbers should not be able to increase. However, we are told that they number in the millions, when they began with only a few thousand. How?
A character called Parc might provide the answer. He is one of the Rasu’s victims on a distant space station. Like most Asterions, he has made a backup of his psyche (a kind of computer program that preserves his memories, skill sets, and personality in case he is ‘psyche-wiped’ or suffers enough physical damage through accident or combat that his body dies.) The intention is to ‘install’ that backup psyche into a functioning but psyche-empty body. This means that Asterions must be capable of technologically creating new, functioning, living bodies that are empty of memories and skill sets. I accepted that. What I couldn't accept was how a backup program meant to preserve memories could magically change a generic body into Parc’s identical one. Yet this is what happens. Good old Parc is suddenly back with his buddies, while tortured Parc is still alive!
If Jennsen had worked this out in a way I could believe, it might explain how Asterions multiplied without children. Doubles, triples, even thousands of any one individual might exist. However, people identical to others still living are not individuals. If it takes thousands of any single Asterion to solve a problem, then individuality is not the key to Asterions' superiority as a species. And there goes Jennsen's premise.
The author needed a really good editor to point out how inadequately she had thought through her world. She needed an editor to tell her how unbelievable and even anachronistic her characters are. She needed an editor to point out there is no suspense in a book where the protagonist always succeeds. She needed an editor to show her how her paragraphing confuses and how not to frequently misuse prepositions (e.g. "execute on", "how good of a friend").
In traditional publishing, at least a reader has people other than the author to look to if a book doesn't work. But Jennsen likes self-publishing. She says it allows her to maintain the purity of her artistic vision. Unfortunately, any vision she has is as thin as the coating on a mirror, and very smudged indeed. G. S. Jennsen didn’t want anyone else's opinions, and so she has no one to blame but herself for the sad thing this trilogy turned out to be.