2.5 stars
I had a hard time with this book, it was easy to set it down and hard to pick it up again. I started this book on April 1st, and I didn't finish it until April 28th, almost a full month! For someone who reads most books in about a week, that's a LONG time. I started a few other books while I was in the middle of this one, because it just wasn't holding my attention, but I did keep coming back to this one. Willig is one of my favorite authors, and I usually inhale anything she writes, so I was determined to finish this.
I really liked the setting; these are time periods and places that are not usually the subject of popular historical fiction, and I appreciated that. It's also interesting to have a dual timeline format where the timelines are only two years apart, and tracking the same main character. Willig has once again done her homework, and the settings and time periods feel real and authentic.
In the Historical Note at the end, Willig explains that almost all of the characters and events in this book are based on real people, which is amazing and awesome! But it also might be the root of my problem with this book. It was TOO detailed. Willig claims in the note: "Many, many details and many many scenes were deleted during the editing phase." And I think it needed a few more rounds of editing. This was meant to be a novel, not an historical treatise. She continues: "The bits that had to go included a description of stumbling into a wedding party at the village of Arachova, and a lot of details about the various excavations, including the fact that Delphi was crisscrossed by train tracks put in by the French to haul away the mounds of dirt they needed to move to uncover the classical site beneath a modern village. (Why, yes, the original draft did include the exact number of cartloads of dirt removed.)" I CRINGE at the thought. Perhaps being trapped inside with small children during the pandemic, away from her editor, caused Willig to lose her mind a bit.
Normally I enjoy multiple timeline books, and I've never been annoyed at jumps back and forth in time in any other book Willig has written, But in this book, it drove me bonkers. EACH time, JUST as I was starting to become interested in the storyline, BOOM, end of chapter, jump to the other time. It was impossible for me to become engaged in either timeline. I was bored, and not interested, and it became harder and harder to even want to pick this book up again. I do love how Willig connects the two chapters, for example (and I chose randomly - EVERY time jump has this clever connection) a chapter in 1897 ends: "You needn't bother. I'll find my own passage back." And the next chapter, in 1898, begins: "We'll have you back soon. Just another few miles." But, that cleverness aside, I was deeply annoyed. I believe this might have been a stronger and more cohesive book if Willig had let go of the idea of alternating timelines, and told this chronologically.
Annoyingly, each character has a seeeeecret in their past that they are coyly hiding from the reader, and I hate that writing style. If I am inside the character's head, I want to know everything that character knows. None of this (and I paraphrase here) "he thought back to that night and winced" coy suggestive nonsense. TELL me what happened that night, or get me out of this character's head. If I know he's thinking about "that night" then I also want to know what "that night" entails. I'm sure Willig has used this structure before, but it has never annoyed me like it did in this book.
The main character, Betsy, is an archeology student who studied in Greece in 1896, and somehow ended up as a trained Red Cross nurse. She then signs up to work with the Red Cross again - for the most idiotic of reasons - in Cuba in 1898. And I think that is the root of my problem with this book: Betsy's motivation does not make sense. I liked the setting, I liked the characters, but the reason the characters were in that setting was inane. Betsy spends A LOT of time whining and complaining and blaming herself for everything that happens around her, and it got old. Sure, I know that if a child is constantly told they are at fault for their mother's death, they will internalize that. Yes, I get that it might cause some lasting trauma. But once you grow up and get out of that house and go to college and then go away to grad school, it's time to stop blaming yourself when OTHER people die. People get to make their own choices. It's not up to Betsy to make choices for them.
The big disagreement between Betsy and Ava also seemed overblown. How could a deep sister-like friendship be torn asunder by a simple disagreement? (In fairness, they do make up later in the book, so it was not a permanent rift.)
A few other things annoyed me, including frequent references to the smell of "carbolic" - but, what does that smell like?? I have no idea. It felt like that word was being thrown around just to remind us that this is set in the late 19th century. It's not a meaningful descriptor for most modern readers.
And speaking of scents, one passage describes: "the air rich with the scent of roses and hollyhocks, geraniums and begonias, driving out the stench of carbolic and death." And I've had gardens, I've grown all four of those plants, and never in my life have I met a hollyhock or a begonia with a notably strong scent, and geraniums are only scented when you brush their foliage. (Yes, some begonias have a mild fragrance, but hardly enough to scent the air in an outdoor garden. They are not a flower I think of when I think of fragrant flowers.) In a book filled with accurate details, I'm not sure how she flubbed this one. It would have been so simple to just say "the air rich with the scent of flowers." Or even just quickly google "fragrant summer garden flowers" (Better Homes & Gardens has a nice article listing some plants) and then cross-check that against what might have been blooming in Greece in July, 1897. (Hint: not hyacinths, not in July.) Google is a wonder.
And one more complaint: the title is "Two Wars and a Wedding." The "two wars" are obvious, but which is the one wedding? Because there are TWO weddings mentioned in this book. I suppose "two wars and two weddings" doesn't have the same catchy appeal.