"Our vast, deep ocean is incredibly fragile and its greatest threat is us."
Heffernan writes at the end of this insightful volume that she had intended to write a book laced with hope, given the recent moves towards a Treaty of the high seas, but through her process of research, she instead slipped further into despair. This book is focused on current events - light on explanatory science, instead Heffernan aims to catch us up with momentus events around the oceans that comprise most of our planet's surface.
It is to her credit that this book is not a depressing read, but it is one in which terror starts to slip in the gaps between the reporting, as Heffernan covers a variety of topics with a depressingly homogenous set of drivers towards ecological failure.
The High Seas of the title refers to the pelagic ocean beyond national ownership, the "wild west" of pirates in lore. As we head towards an unprecedented globally interlinked ecological crisis, the role of global commons becomes crucial. With no longer a need for a place beyond the law, the question becomes how do we govern.
Chapters here include foci on fishing rights, illegal fishing, shipping, gene piracy, deep sea mining, waste disposal (including space junk) antarctic ice melt and iceberg towing. There are absolutely bright spots, especially the results of crusaders against illegal cartels and the use of both diplomacy and technology to curb them. There are some mixed stories, Heffernan covers the complexity of genetic sampling briefly but intelligently, highlighting the costs of global inequity and unequal power balances. But most of this is a not only a tale of woe, but depressingly similar. The cumulative damage to the ocean from these combined activities is pushing to tipping points, but each individual contribution tends to point to the others as being worse, or cites their own relatively small impact vs the vast ocean. As science and technology advance in unprecedented leaps, the ocean promises solutions to existing anthropocene problems, and the pesky fact that taking such risks is how we got here in the first place seems a little guache to mention. Mining companies, fishing companies, transport companies, cruise lines, NASA all hold enormous power within national governments which protect them. There is an absurd number of ways protective zones can be established, yet few are adopted, and when they are, they rarely make any difference. (One particularly headspinning paragraph explains we now have more than 270 designated Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs). Within these, there are also designated VMAs or Vulnerable Marine Systems, as well as IBAs (Important Bird Areas) and IMAs (Important Marine Mammal Areas). Yet, while Pelagos has aspects of all of these, it is so badly protected by them - industry still operates freely - that the WWF is applying for a new kind of status, a Particularly Sensitive Sea Area (PSSA) in order to strengthen it).
The other shocking component that Heffernan finds is how much of the destruction is to benefit a tiny percentage of the world's population. Sea bed trawling, pelagic fishing, all basically work largely for luxury fish which are far from staple foods. The majority of plastic waste in the oceean actually comes from industrial fishing - and including land plastic, just 20 companies account for 55% of global plastic waste. While medicines from genetic patents have underpinned enormous worldwide enhancements, the profits being fought over are concentrated in a tiny number of hands.
And perhaps most devastatingly, there is ongoing appetite for quick, high risk, solutions: "The suggestion of towing icebergs across oceans to solve the world’s water shortages may be a folly of sorts, but it’s symptomatic of our relationship with the planet. As challenging as such a scheme sounds, to us it seems somehow easier than looking for durable solutions to our environmental problems, such as reducing water use in parts of the world, curtailing our greenhouse gas emissions, or consuming our ocean resources more mindfully. At a societal level, this inertia means we consistently choose the present over the future, taking ecological decline as the inevitable hit."
Heffernan is not ultimately calling on us to change habits, although she notes it can't hurt. But the reality she tracks is that it is policy descisions and the acts of the wealthy and the incorporated which are driving the damage, not consumers or hungry and thirsty populations. Change must come through visibility and demands for it, not choosing your diet more carefully.
This is an important read, and a nice companion to James Bradley's Deep Water, which takes a more economic and science tack. It feels like an urgent book. It will date quickly, and hopefully Heffernan will prove overly pessimistic. But one thing that might help is more people reading and digesting this material (as opposed to illegally and/or irresponsibly caught fish).