I'm going to start by asking anyone who happens to read this to take it lightly. I'm not that knowledgable in this subject so this is purely my personal feelings towards this book.
It's not a bad book I don't think. But I didn't like it. I even skipped. (!!) I never skip. Well, I rarely skip I should say. I did up until about 20 pages from the end with only skipping some biblical quotes and then towards the end I started skipping a little more. So for the most part, I did read the book.
I like how Mrs. Robertson wrote the book and she seems very open and honest. I didn't like the many, many quotes from the Bible and I didn't like that it seemed she was using the book to converts more people. There's a time and place for everything and this isn't touted as being a book for people who want to convert. Just by reading the title alone, not to mention the cover photo of the web, it's obvious this is supposed to be a relation of her experience in the Mormom church. Which it is. Amongst converting people.
I'm very touchy when it comes to religon and people trying to convert me though- maybe it's not as bad I'm making it out to be. Read it and decide for yourself I say.
I liked very much how she detailed some of the discrepancies between the Mormom church and Christianity. I also enjoyed hearing how she went about trying to let people know these differences.
I have a very hard time understand how someone can just believe in something they know nothing about so easily. It's like someone could walk up to someone like this and tell them the sky is actually, in all honesty, NOT blue, but purple and they'll say "Really?! Wow- thanks for letting me know." Then they'll just assume they must be color blind and go on with life. Is there anything they WON'T believe? Maybe I was blessed with a little more common sense than the average person?
She mentioned in the beginning of the book that she "felt dehumaized and old" wearing that awful, awful undergarment the Mormons say protects you. I certainly hope Mrs. Robertson doesn't relate old with dehumanized- that's a pretty severe thought IMO. (That sentence bothered me if you can't tell, which is why I mentioned it.)
Okay, Mormons can't drink coffeee, smoke cigarettes, etc. Judy gave up coffee when she converted. Great, okay. So, in the midst of Judy coming to the realizations that the Mormon church was full of secrets and lies, she starts her research. She comes across a quote (of course) and reads that "Such regulations indeed have an appearance of wisdom, with their self imposed worship, their false humility and their harsh treatment of the body, but they lack any value in restraining sensual indulgence."- Colossians 2:23
The next paragraph from Mrs. Robertson is this: "I can't tell you how much that gives me a sense of freedom. I can drink this coffee and not feel guilty at all. It's not abstaining from this stuff that makes me righteous, anyway; it's faith in Jesus Christ! Wow! I'm really free!"
Need I say more? I think it would have really confused her is someone had walked up and told her that coffee was evil. I hope no one ever tells her that breathing air is evil. Come on, seriously.
Lastly I'll mention this because while it took me awhile to realize it, since I did think about it, it's always there when reading something related to the subject. Mrs. Robertson talks about others having so many questions once she started Concerned Christians- they asked her questions like 'Why are LDS seminary buildings across the street from every junior high and senior high school in the state of Arizone? Why is their Institute of Religon across the street from Mesa Community College?' I have my own question now. Why do they believe on "bringing down" as many "spirit babies" as their bodies can possibly handle? Hmmmm...it's all related. Maybe becuase a family of 56 is populating the world much faster than a family of 3. In 20 years that family of 56 is going to be multiplied who knows how many times. Take into account that the girls are married off and start becoming pregnant as early as before theur pre-teens years to.
Am I the only one who sees this stuff or what?
I welcome any intelligent comments, questions or statements about this review or the subject in general. I'm interested in the subject of course or I wouldn't have read the book. Anyone who wants to get mad that I didn't like the book or about my feelings towards the book (or anything else too for that matter) will be laughed at but anyone wanting to come correct and have a discussion is more than welcome.