At the beginning i need to apologize for my English, for i am a fresh graduate from a foreign language school in Nanjing, China. As you can see, i am still struggling with this newly-learnt language. I read this book in the purpose of learning English, also because this book ,together with Tolerance(also written by Vanloon),is so famous in China. However, after reading it, i find it extremely perplexing to understand why so many chinese like it: it is completely EUROCENTRIC.
Firstly, the writer takes pity on we Asians in a hypocritical way. "In the price of our recent technical inventions, we may loudly boast of 'our great Western Progress', but that much-counted progress of the west is merely a continuation of the progress that was begun in the east." Such kind of sentences are found everywhere in the book, although seemingly he is praising us, I just feel his over-loaded patriotism and proud as a westerner. Same phenomenon happens in the chapter talking about China, I know he tries to show respect to China, but his sense of superiority is still so obvious. His attitude is like when a wealthy man pitying a begger.By the way, he is really ignorant about our history, which I can understand putting him in the historical background, but i still recommend foreign readers not to take this chapter seriously.
He also equates modernisation to westernisation. I am so sorry that I do not have the book on hand so I cannot find any examples.
Lastly, I just want to show my discontent to the title: the discovery of Asia—in his view, we only come into play when we influnece the Europe.
Anyway, I can understand his prejudices as a 20—century white man. I admit China was really a kind of poor and cloistered at that time, too. I just wonder why we chinese also like him.We even honour him as the master of humanism. Maybe, we are just too ignorant about European history that we really think he knows surprisingly a lot, or maybe, we are just fogged by the enthusiasm of "westernization".