This book is a great example of “a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing.” You can’t just go, “here’s some issues with this historical fact,” and “this is obviously nonsense and nobody has any evidence for it,” then slide in, “so, it’s mystical and the best mystical interpretations are from Kabbalah and Hinduism.”
It’s a sneaky sleight of hand, especially considering the historical resources available at the time he wrote this. Yes, scholarship hadn’t advanced to where it is today, but don’t come at me all hard about stuff that’s just flat wrong. “NAILS HADNT BEEN INVENTED YET YOU DUMB BIG MORONS LOL JESUS AND NAILS ARE YOU JOSHING ME?!” Nails had been invented for 3.5 millennia by that point, at the least.
“YOU BIG CHEDDARHEADED MORONS YOU SERIOUSLY HAVE NO EVIDENCE AT ALL FOR THE HISTORICAL JESUS OUTSIDE THE GOSPELS.” Yes we do. The Josephus entry is considered by most scholars to have been modified, but partially authentic. Tacitus counts too. There’s some Talmudic speculation, but nobody seriously thinks R. Jehoshua Ben Piratha is the Jesus of the New Testament.
This book is a fun hodgepodge of nostalgic references though. I found myself saying, “you know, I need to go read up on the Chaldeans, I forgot about them,” or, “that sound stupid, is that really representative of Tertullian’s broad view? Oh it’s not, great!”
Tl;dr:
Everyone who read this book is now dumber for having read it. I award you one star, and may God have mercy on your soul.