Mr Kristof is an exceptionally talented wordsmith and seems like a genuine, well intentioned guy. The sort of person I believe I would enjoy conversing with on a range of topics, of which he would likely help educate me on most of them. He's done incredible work on advancing issues related to girls/woman's rights/freedom/safety, he's exposed corrupt leaders and businesses, advanced and fostered a robust and healthy dialogue on Democracy and freedom, all while living a fascinating and unique life.
Because of all of these factors and others I enjoyed reading much of this book, EXCEPT... it's apparent that Mr Kristol and I have very different views on the root causes of most of the issues he covers, and more importantly the actions that should be taken to bring about true and lasting change. Because of this, as I read I grew increasingly irritated and annoyed.
Here's my journal entries that started around pg 150 or so:
Mr Kristof's paternalistic, US centric perspective is beginning to upset me. He just spent two pages writing (beautifully) about the girls in Cambodia who are sex trafficked, and as he's leaving the location he relates: "I walked out of that brothel wondering about my own moral responsibility. Sophia was a thirteen year old prisoner, effectively a slave, and every l every day stranger men walked into the brothel and exploited her and then walked away." OK, here it comes. An acknowledgement and examination of colonialism and capitalism's exploitive externalizing and creation of winners and losers and his role as a citizen of the US who benefits and contributed via their tax dollars and support of various administrations... NOPE!
"I spent time in the brothel, gathered up the girls' stories and satisfied my needs and then left the girls behind." UGH! Me, me, me, woah is me and my horrible guilt. And now back to work for the NYT, mouthpiece of the corporate empire.
Sure, occasionally he acknowledges colonial history and it's inevitably sad impact on the countries citizens, but I have yet to find an instance where he directly connects current policies with suffering, especially the role of the US. Here's an example of his "recognition" that there are significant factors that create and exacerbate inequality, war, etc. on pg 221 "So I came to think that the two crucial factors for development are mass education and good governance and leadership. They explain why East Asia generally thrived..." Isn't that convenient?! Once again zero acknowledgement of outside influence being a critical factor in creating and sustaining the conditions I described.
As I read i continued to add entries:
Sigh... out comes the humans are inherently violent trope - on pg 225 Mr Kristof references 'Lord Of The Flies' to be a catch all for chaos and once again perpetuates the falsehood of moral breakdown bring inevitable. If you are unfamiliar with the real story about the boys who survived and cooperated vs the Golding fabrication I highly suggest you read Humankind.
It was inevitable and on about page 228 charity and foundations heroically enter the scene with the arrival of Mr Carter & Mr Gates. From this point on the author periodically references amazing charity work and praises how important they are and how they ameliorate certain wrongs... please, please read "Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World" by Anand Giridharadas. This fantastic book challenges readers to critically examine how social change is approached by those with power and wealth, arguing for more systemic solutions that may require fundamental changes to existing power structures. To me charity is generally acts as a band aid for a severed limb to the receiver, and a sugar free lollipop for the giver.
Towards the end of the book he even demonstrates his allegiance to the Church of Gladwell when he begins citing statistics about poverty and infant mortality and how great life is today vs any other time... this theory has been thoroughly debunked in numerous places - look out up.
Later still he is describing how Goldman Sachs invested in Backpage and how this site facilitated human trafficking. Mr Kristol describes how GS sold/gave away their shares as soon as he exposed this but later promoted the employee who had been on the board at Backpage to partner. Then the author writes, "I don't think that Goldman partner was an evil person, any more than pharma executives who marketed painkillers were necessarily evil. But I do think that people watching PowerPoint presentations in corporate conference rooms don't ponder-or care enough about the human devastation they cause." Ooooh, they aren't evil, they just "don't care enough". Really? Your that naive to believe they aren't willfully ignorant and in denial and it rationalizing because they only care about their bottom line!? I'm not a believer in 'evil' either but I know when someone is a calculating, conscious exploiter and see little difference between the child trafficker and the GS executive who finances their actions.
That's the thing, Mr Kristof never truly takes a stand about capitalism and the role it plays in ALL of the awful war zones, droughts, climate chaos events he bravely documents. He's a big D Democrat. A... centrist and that's not going to help us in this final hour where dramatic action and hard truth matter most.