I have conflicted feelings about Artisan Bread in 5 Minutes a Day. I'll start with what's good: I've made the "master recipe" boule dozens of times. More often than not, I have a batch of dough sitting in the fridge. It does get better with age (it's good for up to 2 weeks) and it does elicit the comment "this is good bread!" from the many friends and family I've made it for. It's simple and satisfying. The second comment it gets is "what kind of bread is this?" It's a lovely mutt of French, Italian, sourdough, and peasant bread; soft inside, crusty crackly outside, with an open crumb structure. Love it. That alone is why the book gets 3 stars from me.
Now, the negative. First of all, I would not say, as this book promises, that this is really artisan bread in 5 minutes a day. The active time is short, but the resting times, as with any bread, are long. To make this bread, even if you've made the dough in advance, means letting it rise for 40 minutes and bake for another 30 and then cool for at least 30 more - hardly an easy task for a weeknight dinner. Definitely doable and I like the basic strategy of making a big bowl of dough and pulling loaves off of it throughout the next couple weeks. But not exactly "5 minutes a day."
The title is misleading, and not just the "5 minutes a day" part, because I also wouldn't say that this cookbook has "revolutionized" my baking or bread-making. It's more accurate to say, it bumped me up to a higher level. But there are still bread-making heights to achieve even further beyond what this book can offer.
Which brings me to the rest of my complaints. First of all, no weights are provided. Even for an American home baker like me used to cups and tablespoons, I always prefer recipes with weights, especially grams. It's just more accurate, especially when you're dealing with flour. It's annoying to have to "scoop and sweep" and take guesses because the book doesn't provide weighted measurements.
And the next problem is, when I scoop and sweep, I have always, uniformly ended up with too loose of a dough to work with. After making the master recipe many times and trying other recipes in the book, I can say with confidence that either the writers have used flour that weighs and measures different than my flour, or that they're not scooping and sweeping, or that they just haven't allowed for enough flour in the recipes. The recipes usually say that the dough should "be loose enough to conform to the shape of its container" but I have found that when I add the recommended amount of flour using scoop and sweep, the dough is so loose it's more liquid than solid and more resembles a batter than a dough.
This clashes with the recommended method of quickly grabbing a 1-pound ball of dough and shaping it with your hands - I have ended up with a gloopy mess that gets all over my hands, my kitchen, and leads to a misshapen loaf, more times than I can count. I routinely have to add ½ to 1 cup of extra flour for the dough to be remotely workable, and it's annoying to have to incorporate so much trial and error and guesswork.
My other major complaint is that even though the book does contain many recipes for all different types of breads (everything from pizza dough to brioche, it's in here), and I will admit I have not tried many of these recipes, when you start diverging from that master recipe and basic boule, things tend to get... weird. I tried the potato and roasted garlic bread - surprisingly little garlic flavor even though it contains an entire head of roasted garlic, and sort of a weird texture from the mashed potatoes. I tried the pita breads - disaster. Floury, tough messes because that dough is just too wet and slack to form pitas from. I tried the pizza dough - average. And I've tried the rye bread - not a very strong rye/caraway flavor.
I think the problem is that the "discovery that revolutionizes home baking" - namely, that you can make a large batch of dough and bake it off throughout the next week or two to save time and have fresh bread every day - just isn't feasible for every type of bread. Making pitas or pizza dough out of that master recipe base, although recommended in the book, is not workable because it's just not an appropriate dough for all purposes like that. Tweaking the master recipe to add rye just gives you a dough that tastes a bit like rye, not a real authentic rye bread. I haven't even tried the brioche or challah type recipes - even though I love enriched doughs, every recipe makes several batches that have to be used relatively quickly because of the eggs and milk, and I just don't have the capacity or room left in my waistband to eat cinnamon buns or challah French toast or what have you every day.
I think the main flaw with this book is that they tried to come up with a silver bullet, a method and dough recipe that can work with everything and be applied the same way to every situation. But diverging into other bread recipes out there, with their medley of different rising times and methods (for instance, starting with a sponge, which I don't believe any of these recipes do), you can see how maybe there's an argument for finding a recipe that fits your unique thing you want to make, rather than trying to start with the same recipe and tailor and tweak it to fit any finished product.
That's my loose collection of thoughts about this book. Honestly, the real problem is probably that I'm just not a good enough baker!