AN EXPANSION OF HIS ARGUMENTS AT THE ‘STRANGE FIRE’ CONFERENCE
John MacArthur wrote in the Foreword to this 2023 book, “It should be obvious to anyone who observes the modern Charismatic Movement that the gifts of healing, prophesy, and speaking in tongues practiced by today’s Pentecostals are nothing like the apostolic gifts described in Acts and 1 Corinthians. Furthermore, the peculiar manifestations that have dominated that movement in recent decades (holy laughter, drunkenness in the Spirit, spiritual birthing, fire tunnels, animal noises, people being slain in the spirit, and other peculiar charismatic practices) bear no resemblance whatsoever to the work of the Holy Spirit as described in the New Testament."
Author Tom Pennington wrote in the Preface, “In 2013, Strange Fire, a conference … held at Grace Community Church where John MacArthur pastors … marked a major resurgent interest in defending the person and work of the Holy Spirit… [I was asked] to present the biblical case for cessationism at the conference… My problem was the sheer extravagance of biblical material… Over the ten years since the conference, I have been … amazed at how the Lord has been pleased to use the conference … to equip… His church… Since Strange Fire, I have further developed each argument, hopefully making the biblical case for cessationism more in-depth and compelling… I have been able to give further treatment to the details of the arguments. But I also wanted to keep it short enough so that no one … would be discouraged by the book’s length.” (Pg. x-xi)
In the first chapter, he explains, “Cessationists believe the Holy Spirit no longer sovereignly gives individual Christians the temporary sign gifts, also known as the miraculous gifts, described in the New Testament… We argue that these gifts were present and active during the … apostolic era, but haven’t been in operation beyond that time period, including today… The miraculous gifts played a unique role in the Spirit’s work in the New Testament church and were never meant to be normative outside of the first-century, apostolic era... Continuationists believe the miraculous gifts either continued unabated since the birth of the church … or waned during most of the church age but were restored early in the twentieth century.” (Pg. 3-4)
He notes, “continuationists claim the New Testament doesn’t explicitly state that the miraculous gifts will cease during the church age. I agree with them… but the argument cuts both ways. The New Testament doesn’t say they will continue either.” (Pg. 15)
He reports, “In about 4,000 years of Old Testament history, there were only 130 years in which God empowered men to work miracles. Even during those years, miracles didn’t happen frequently. Why? Because everyone didn’t have the ability to perform miracles, only four God-appointed men did. And even those men---God’s prophets---didn’t perform miracles all the time. Miracles were rare even in their lives.” (Pg. 31)
He asserts, “Moses provided three criteria for determining whether one who came after him and claimed to be a prophet was truly speaking on God’s behalf. First, a true prophet’s predictions always come true… Some charismatics argue that the first-tier of prophecy is inspired Scripture but that there is also a second-tier of prophecy that is legitimate but can still contain error… A second criterion … is that his message must always be in complete doctrinal agreement with previous revelation… The final criterion is also in Deuteronomy 13:1-5. There, Moses implies that if God chose to authenticate a prophet, he would do so by empowering him to perform miracles, as He had done with Moses… On those special occasions in redemptive history when God chose to validate a true prophet, he did so by allowing him to work miracles.” (Pg. 38-41)
He argues, “Since the divine purpose for miracle-working men is consistent throughout the Scripture, it is reasonable to expect that with the death of the apostles and the end of God’s revelation through them, the human capacity to work miracles would end as well, just as miracles had ended after the ministries of Moses and Joshua, and after Elijah and Elisha… miracle-working men served a unique purpose and are no longer necessary. With the close of the biblical canon of Scripture, God’s primary purpose for miracle-working men became unnecessary and obsolete.” (Pg. 58-59)
He outlines, “The New Testament provides three essential qualifications that had to be met to be an apostle. He had first to be an eyewitness of the resurrected Jesus Christ… A second qualification is that he had to be personally appointed by Christ Himself… A third and final qualification is he had to have the ability to work miracles… In 2 Corinthians 12:12, Paul says that being able to perform ‘signs and wonders and miracles’ was part of the apostolic credentials.” (Pg. 65-66)
He points out, “Cessationists are often misrepresented as believing God doesn’t heal people today. But that’s dead wrong. We believe that God is the only One who heals and that He does so constantly… God normally uses means to heal. Most commonly he uses the body’s own immune system… He also often uses doctors with their procedures and medicines to bring healing. God occasionally intervenes supernaturally to heal. In a few brief periods of biblical history, he gave unique men miraculous power to heal. And He has often chosen to heal directly, not using any means but acting by Himself… To suggest that Cessationists do not believe God heals today is just not true!” (Pg. 123-124)
He summarizes, “The primary purpose of this book is to present the biblical arguments for cessationism. With any issue, the first and foremost question must always be, ‘What does the Bible say?' So I have sought to faithfully argue from the truth of God’s Word, rather than hearsay, tradition, experience, or even history. Cessationism stands on the bedrock of the Word of God, and I have endeavored to let the Scripture speak as the final authority. Church history must never be allowed to equal or supersede the authority of Scripture. Historical arguments must never trump what the Bible says, and historical consensus alone is not indisputable evidence for a theological position. Church history is an argument for cessationism---but it should never be the defining one.” (Pg. 159)
This book will interest those Christians seeking a concise argument for cessationism.