I received this book as a Goodreads Giveaways win with gratitude. This, in no way, will reflect in my honest opinion of the book. I have given quotation locations by chapter, paragraph, and lines, as the pages of the ARC may not match the pages of another copy.
There is a passage that I do have trouble with. And that is in chapter 10 (paragraph 7, lines 10-12).
The sentence as written is "In front of it, a closed-up auto repair shop and a weed-infested passel of rusted used cars give this place, where some of history's gaudiest figures once stood, an Appalachian look."
Having been born in and grown up in a rural Appalachian town, I find this characterization problematic at best, for a few reasons.
When I think of Appalachia, I first think of lush green mountains, waterfalls, and populations that are isolated both geographically and culturally. Rusted, old, weed-infested cars is not a first thought. Does that image exist in Appalachia? Absolutely, but it also exists in many rural and impoverished areas, and is not exclusive to the Appalachian areas, which are vastly spread and diverse from one community to the next. To say that it is an "Appalachian look" is both inaccurate and a continuation of harmful stereotypes, which seems irrelevant on a book about France.
When quoting this book to others (without revealing its title), I've come across some misunderstandings. I read that sentence to my mother, an analytic chemist (so pretty intelligent), and her response was, "The author has probably never been here." While I don't share her assumption, I do think it speaks to how Appalachian residents feel about the passage.
Another friend of mine, when I read her the sentence, assumed I was reading _Hillbilly Elegy_ by J.D. Vance, and recommended better book choices on the Appalachian area.
Incidentally, even I, a product of a rural Appalachian town, would not eat unwrapped and unwashed food from a garbage bag. I don't care how new the garbage bag was.
Additionally, there is another sentence that may cause some offense, which is in chapter 29 (paragraph 17, lines 11-13) and reads "The cantonment, the club, this iota of England Janna and her successors had constructed were, like autism, parts of a spectrum. Although this sentence is accurate regarding autism, many in the autistic community would be offended by the mention of "the spectrum," which connotes, to them, deficit. Many autistic people feel that their neurodivergence is a difference and not a disorder.
There are also parts of the book I found incredibly insightful, like this passage in chapter 22, last paragraphs "As I observed the children's delight in violence, it occurred to me that maybe so much history is so fake because it is written by grown-ups. Adults feel obliged to try to impart direction on history, to impose meaning on events. From egoism and murder they confect happy endings, They like to pretend humans are essentially benign.
Children know better."
Overall, I find Mr. Allman has a very negative and pessimistic world view, which probably comes from reporting on wars. It just gave my reading a darker tone than I expected. The book does contain unnecessary violent details of deaths. I'm perfectly happy knowing a man died from a stone thrown at his head. I didn't need to know how far his grey matter or blood traveled.
Having said that, I love learning new things, and I did enjoy learning some of the area's historical details. This book is replete with historical information, a wealth of knowledge of it, which appeals to my curiosity.