Disclosure: I received a complimentary copy of the book from the publisher. Opinions expressed are my own.
Spiritual Themes
There’s a significant thread about what it means to forgive someone. Is it the same as agreeing with their actions? Does forgiveness entail reconciliation?
Travis has a meaningful conversation with a stranger about purpose in life and about God wiping away our tears in Rev. 21:4 (which is part of my very favorite passage of Scripture!).
Although Travis, himself, is not a Christian, his eidetic memory reminds him of Scriptures he encountered, growing up.
In a moment of honest prayer, Adira, who is also not a Christian, prays for the safety of her teammates. I really liked how authentic this moment feels.
What I Liked
Pacing and Perspectives
James is an excellent storyteller. I was very impressed with how he wove so many different threads together into a fascinating, robust plotline. We read a lot of perspectives in addition to Travis’, with multiple secondary characters receiving their own scenes.
I really liked the variety of perspectives, which strongly contributed to the (masterful) pacing of the story. The many shifts made for a clipped read that captured and held my interest. There’s just so much happening, and each perspective is necessary in bringing an additional piece of the puzzle and establishing the chronology.
Motive and Means
The novel implicitly explores questions of motive and method: the why of characters doing what they’re doing. Different perspectives illustrate varying motives and rationalizations. While one character is lured into crime by the promise of benefitting a loved one, other characters are motivated (or claim to be motivated) by principle and the desire to effect the greater good (underscored by actions that are very clearly not achieving that end).
These character insights also tie into the large and prevalent question: “Does the end justify the means?” There are a number of conversations, as well as personal reflections, that contemplate this question. While several of the characters justify their actions on the basis of end result, one of the antagonists is presented as exclusively mercenary. Another character is motivated, at first, by compulsion, but begins to enjoy the criminal lifestyle.
I like that James targets these questions/themes from various perspectives, contributing to a robust discussion on actions and justification.
Juxtapositions
I don’t often have occasion to comment on something like this, but something that caught my attention in this book was the author’s use of juxtaposition, where a sentence or sentences builds to a sudden twist. I observed this in a passage about Travis’ dad (p. 146), and juxtaposition also plays a role in the plot through the inclusion of a word puzzle that Travis is trying to solve.
In another instance, a sentence is redivided to create new meaning, as Travis’ thoughts about the numbness in his face turns to a different kind of introspection (p. 41). These surprises are so well-placed and demonstrate James’ skill in packing significant meaning into unassuming passages.
Content Notes / Respectful Discussion
I encountered some content early on that led me to question whether or not I would finish the book. I proceeded with caution, but this did lower my rating of a title that could have easily been five stars.
We learn that Travis’ coworker, Gunnar, writes fiction, with “memorable” (and “cringeworthy”) love scenes and that Gunnar needs to stick with adult fiction so that his descriptions can be anatomical. A little bit later, Gunnar reads a brief excerpt from the novel and, while the excerpt turns out to just be about kissing, it sounds more inappropriate because we have been primed with the knowledge that Gunnar writes really weird stuff. (At least that was my experience).
Thankfully, this is the only excerpt from Gunnar’s novel, and Gunnar’s writing did not turn out to be a big part of the book.
With that said, this part of the story felt unnecessary to me, overall. There are allusions to Gunnar writing so that he can help his sister financially and restore their relationship, so I understand that characterization. However, overall, it felt like Gunnar’s novel was meant to contribute humor/wit, and I felt that these parts weren’t particularly clever.
Aside from Gunnar, there’s a bit of discussion about Travis and his relationship with his girlfriend, Adira. He does not sleep with her, because he wants to guard their relationship, but he is tempted at one point. At another point, he holds her to comfort her.
There’s also a brief reference to a “gender-nonconforming” artist, when Adira sees a piece of artwork at an exhibit. After reading the artist statement, Adira decides that she does not “get the modern ‘art’ world at all.”
Finally, there’s some disturbing content in terms of what the criminals are willing to do in order to get what they want.
Recommendation Status / Concluding Thoughts
Fatal Domain has a lot of content notes. I was most bothered by Gunnar’s book, although I also wasn’t very fond of Travis’ temptation in his relationship with Adira. (It was realistic, though). Due to the amount and nature of the “content,” this is a title that I would recommend with a lot of reader discretion.
With that said, it is also a very well-written book, which I immensely enjoyed reading. The storytelling is stellar. I’m very impressed with James’ weaving together so many different threads and themes into a single story, and the ending has left me quite curious as to what will happen next.
If I were rating storyline alone, this would be a five star book. But, because content is a big consideration for me, I’m giving this a “low” four. Recommended, with generous reader discretion, to those who enjoy suspense and espionage.