I have to admit to being in two minds about Fiennes. This is the first book of his that I've read and pretty early on began to have the feeling that it was a book 'thrown together' by him in order to raise subsistence funds. Later, he admits as much, that his books have often been his only source of income. On the other hand, it has to be said that he has raised millions of pounds for charity and very often, has raised sufficient funds for expeditions, leaving nothing for himself.
It would have been very useful if he had given me as a reader, a path through the book, a raison d'etre if you will, but alas, I'm left to navigate alone, no chapter headings, few maps, and often few explanations of technical terms for the layman.
I admit to having been irritated by Fiennes' poor regard for Norwegians. I would have expected him to be a gentleman and not rubbish their expeditionery efforts because say, they lacked scientific research. Fiennes knows, along with the rest of us, that scientific research from expeditions is a 'nice to have' - that the main goal of the expedition is rather different, such as reaching a pole first. I'm also struck at times, by Fiennes' amateur approach to some issues, such as spending only two days in training with kites, when several weeks were warranted.
So I'm left admiring the man in some ways, and being disappointed in him in other ways. I profoundly disagree with his assessment of Scott as the world's greatest polar explorer, his disparagement of the Norwegians, his criticism of Roland Huntford's books, and his belief that manhauling is the most efficient form of polar travel. I'm glad I read the book but I shan't pick up another of his.