The book is divided in 2 volumes.
First part is the story of the author Aajonus treating his son in a hospital after a car crash using his raw foods Primal Diet, mostly consisting of raw milk, raw eggs, raw meat, raw butter and raw honey as well as raw vegetable juices. After the crash, it was told that his son is most likely gonna die, however, through food Aajonus proves that even the most dire cases can be healed.
This part is written in almost a fictional work style, with half of the volume consisting of just dialogues that he was having during his stay in the hospital with the medical personnel, his ex-wife and his son. Sometimes the book makes me wonder how precisely the dialogues are fitting what actually happened in real life, since the book was written years after his son's recovery. Nevertheless, it was a very interesting look into the author's whole history and mind during his toughest times. It was filled with flashbacks of his suffering-filled youth that makes the reader understand, how Aajonus came to the diet that saved his own, his son's and many other people's lives from terrible and "uncurable" diseases.
The second volume is divided in 2 parts. The first one is focusing on explaining the theory and science of the Primal Diet, focusing on how raw foods and processed, cooked foods directly impact one's health, growth etc. The second part lists most common diseases, their causes and treatments using specific raw food combinations.
My biggest problem with the second part is its credibility. There is a lot of information that is presented as facts, but have no actual studies linking to them. As a random example from the book - "In 94% of caesarean sections, doctors chose caesarean birth because they didn't want to wait around countless hours for delivery to occur. In only 6% of caesarean sections has mother or child been in danger and benefited from caesarean surgery". A question arises - where did the author acquire the precise number of 94%, as well as how could he possibly know that in all of these cases it was only because "the doctors didn't want to wait around?" If there is a study linking to this, (which I am very doubtful there is) I would like to see it referenced, but for the most part none of the presented facts are referenced, even if it is clearly mentioned that there is a study proving something the author says.
Additionally, there are many claims in the disease "cause and treatment" part of the book that are claiming very brave conclusions about the reasons for different diseases without any explanation or proof. It is written that many diseases are being created by the lack of enzyme of digesting cooked food of specific color. A lot of what is written, you just have to believe on author's word, which in such a book, that is going up against the traditional knowledge, is definitely not the approach that creates trust. While I am not saying what that what the author claims is false, it raises a lot of questions and doubt in the things he says.
As an example for treatment of diabetes he writes "Eating tremendous amounts of unheated honey (about 3/4 cup throughout each day)" replaces the functions of insulin missing in the blood while it heals the pancreas and encourages pancreatic functions. When clients had been taking insulin for at least two years, he or she did best by weaning himself gradually off insulin over a long period - up to two years; it usually took that long before the pancreas worked well enough."
As long as I have been reading about diabetes, I have read that the cause of diabetes is over-consumption of carbohydrates and that the fastest way to reverse it is through low-carbohydrate, high fat diets, which has been scientifically proven by Hungarian "Paleomedicina" research group to solve diabetes in a matter of less than 6 months, letting the people wean off of the insulin already during the first weeks. They heal people through meat-only (usually cooked) diets. Aajonus take on this disease sounds counter-intuitive - consuming more carbohydrate in the shape of raw honey, which again creates doubt in me about this alternative approach, especially seeing how there is no viewable evidence presented in the book.
Although I am not a fan of other people's testimonials, I wonder if it might have given more credibility to the presented unusual treatments of the presented diseases.
In conclusion, it is a book with a great main message and for the most part useful dietary advice, that makes the reader question the traditional dietary advice. I did take upon the Primal Diet myself, and saw gradual improvements in my health. Sadly, the book lacks proof and more certified research to be taken seriously and being adopted by a bigger crowd of people.