Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Nature of Race: How Scientists Think and Teach about Human Difference

Rate this book
What do Americans think "race" means? What determines one’s race—appearance, ancestry, genes, or culture? How do education, government, and business influence our views on race? To unravel these complex questions, Ann Morning takes a close look at how scientists are influencing ideas about race through teaching and textbooks. Drawing from in-depth interviews with biologists, anthropologists, and undergraduates, Morning explores different conceptions of race—finding for example, that while many sociologists now assume that race is a social invention or "construct," anthropologists and biologists are far from such a consensus. She discusses powerful new genetic accounts of race, and considers how corporations and the government use scientific research—for example, in designing DNA ancestry tests or census questionnaires—in ways that often reinforce the idea that race is biologically determined. Widening the debate about race beyond the pages of scholarly journals, The Nature of Race dissects competing definitions in straightforward language to reveal the logic and assumptions underpinning today’s claims about human difference.

327 pages, Kindle Edition

First published May 25, 2011

8 people are currently reading
143 people want to read

About the author

Ann Morning

2 books2 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
14 (29%)
4 stars
15 (31%)
3 stars
13 (27%)
2 stars
4 (8%)
1 star
1 (2%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Christiane.
45 reviews
March 5, 2017
Presents some interesting concepts and definitely some food for thought. It's a good read if you want to brush up on some terminology regarding race classification. However, I was not convinced by her methodology and the conclusion she drew through this regarding the racial classification tendencies of her subjects interviews and surveys date back to the early 2000s.
Displaying 1 of 1 review