Sharon Olds is a relentlessly sexual poet, so much so that it goes beyond any noble claims toward “pushing the bounds” and “opening the way for others.” It is, pure and simple, a fascination of Olds’. Some, even myself, would point at this running theme and call it “brave” or “unflinching” or whatever else you please. And maybe it is. Maybe it really does open the way for others. Even so, it needs to be grappled with, setting aside the guise of social activism. One needs to confront this poet’s forthright and rather active sexuality. To make peace with it. There can be no looking past the subject matter, as though the ‘true heart’ lay behind it, buried under all the bodily effigies. The work talks about penises and boobies and vaginas; it is inseparable from and integral to the writer.
Take a poem like “I Love It When” from the book’s second section (almost entirely devoted to sex). The speaker relishes the weight of her partner “steady on me as tons of water” as her “heart swells / to a taut purple boxing glove.” The pubic bone of her lover becomes “ a pyramid set / point down on the point of another / —glistening fulcrum.” Cue erotic images of flowers with gigantic stems unfolding in silence. The work is competently done, but what, I ask, separates it from any of the numerous Sharon Olds poems which rehearses the same material, like “Sunday Night in the City” from Satan Says, her first book of poetry? Olds is more interesting, I find, when she has a foreign vehicle to talk about what is actually very familiar, routine, and mundane. In “The Dragons,” for example, the speaker is not participant but voyeur, watching two lizards mating from her window. The dispassionate observations, taking place “in the lens of my binoculars” are far more exciting, being, as they are, less sagged down by every other confessionalist poem about intercourse, especially Olds’.
Except for the poems that feel like they distance themselves from Olds’ previous work, The Wellspring is an artistic regression, even using the same loose four-part thematic structure as Satan Says—daughterhood, wifehood, motherhood, and a “journey” further onwards. “Lament” is another poem in this volume, one about motherhood, that manages to sidestep the generalized regression, also by focusing on a specific object, (in this case, a shattered cow butter dish), as a vehicle for a meditation on nostalgia and transience. ‘They grow up so fast’ isn’t exactly fresh territory, but Olds makes it useful by personalizing the trope, lending the details of her own life to the music, but not letting the one take over the other.
What “Lament” and “The Dragons” have—and what too much of this volume lacks—is an aesthetic distance, something Olds has never been entirely comfortable with. But at a point in her career when she’s plumbed all her traumas, when so few subjects seem novel diaristtcally employed, it is time to broaden, to seek a larger world, further from an id. Done right, it can be more personal, not less.