"Remember that you are a human being with a soul and the divine gift of articulate speech: that your native language is the language of Shakespeare and Milton and The Bible; and don't sit there crooning like a bilious pigeon."
- Professor Henry Higgins, Pygmalion.
Reputation - 4/5
Second to Shakespeare, but before The Bible, Milton is generally judged to be one of the greatest writers of English ever. His masterpiece Paradise Lost is not included in this selection, but in these 100 or so pages you'll find nearly everything else Milton is famous for: several well-known sonnets, Lycidas, L'Allegro, Il Pensoroso, and two longer dramatic works - Comus and Samson Agonistes.
Point - 5/5
Disclaimer: When considering the point or purpose of a work, I am trying to find a way to critique both the author's style and substance. Sometimes a book begins with a deep idea (substance) but the writer is unable to express anything profound about it (style). Either the author doesn't come to a satisfying conclusion about the original idea (substance), or, more often, he or she is simply not talented enough to articulate the idea elegantly (style).
Milton clearly lacks neither style nor substance and Samson Agonistes seems to me to be one of the best examples in English of perfection in both idea and execution.
John Milton had supported Oliver Cromwell and the English Commonwealth, but in 1660, when the monarchy was restored, he became a political fugitive. His writings were burnt and he went into hiding, fearing for his life. He was eventually pardoned, but served time in prison. By the time he was 50, John Milton was a penniless outcast whose life's work had been declared illegal and destroyed. He was also completely blind.
It is difficult to imagine a more obvious case of God abandoning someone of great potential - of making all the talents bestowed on him seem not only wasted, but absurd, of making a mockery of his life.
But Milton thought of someone who'd had it worse. And he thought of the perfect form for expressing that man's story.
He chose the Hebrew, Samson, as his hero. Samson is one of the most well-known Biblical characters, who, in addition to his loss of great strength and reputation, also shared with Milton the misfortune of being blind.
He chose the Ancient Greek form of tragedy to structure the story. He included a Greek chorus to direct action and discuss philosophy. Even in the title of the work, Milton uses an Ancient Greek word: Agonistes ("ἀγωνιστής"), which translates to "the Champion."
He wrote in English, the language of the Anglican Church, of republican liberty, and of self-interpretation of the Bible. In a work that champions freedom of divine interpretation, the freedom of language is essential, and Milton stretches his English to its limits.
The result is a work with a Hebrew hero, a Greek form, and an English verse. To call it a poem or a play or even a closet drama (as it is usually characterized) seems amiss. It is much closer to the negative definition Tolstoy used when describing War and Peace:
“It is not a novel, still less an epic poem, still less a historical chronicle. War and Peace is what the author wanted and was able to express, in the form in which it is expressed.”
Recommendation - 4/5
I would recommend that everyone read John Milton. If the obvious first choice of Paradise Lost is too daunting for the casual reader, then this selection is a fine substitute. You will still read most of what he is famous for, and you will encounter a work of supreme genius that only Milton could have written in Samson Agonistes.
There are, however, a few works in this book that are difficult to recommend. Comus does not hold up well to modern reading. It is a fairy story about abstinence - two things we no longer believe in.
On the whole, Milton has a well-earned reputation for being difficult. He is erudite and philosophical, with almost none of the witty humor you find in Shakespeare. In that sense, Milton may be a burden to some people. You don't have to enjoy him, but you can't ignore him.
Enjoyment - 5/5
I greatly enjoy Milton. It is my personal conviction that he is the greatest writer in the history of the English language.
I recognize this as a personal opinion, having much to do with my temperament. I prefer authors who state their creed boldly, even if I strongly disagree with them. There are few great writers whose politics and religion meddle in their work more than Milton. And in this way, Milton is the Anti-Shakespeare. Where Shakespeare is willing to present you with a dozen characters with differing ideas, and when you ask him to tell you who is right, he'll throw up his hands and slyly smile, Milton will clearly state who is right, who is wrong, and who is going to Hell for it. We see so much of Milton in his work. Everything is personal with him. And maybe that's what makes this poem about his deceased wife so moving:
Methought I saw my late espousèd Saint
Brought to me like Alcestis from the grave,
Whom Jove's great son to her glad husband gave,
Rescued from death by force, though pale and faint.
Mine, as whom washed from spot of childbed taint,
Purification in the Old Law did save,
And such as yet once more I trust to have
Full sight of her in Heaven without restraint,
Came vested all in white, pure as her mind:
Her face was vailed; yet to my fancied sight,
Love, sweetness, goodness, in her person shined
So clear, as in no face with more delight.
But, oh! as to embrace me she inclined,
I waked, she fled, and day brought back my night.