This book's title makes it seem super cheesy, but really, I think everyone that is single needs to read it and everyone married needs to read its predecessor, "Getting the Love You Want."
This book is fascinating on both a personal level and on a sociological level.
Basic premise: We are attracted to potential mates and admire qualities in them that are seemingly different from ourselves. Those qualities end up annoying us and a power struggle ensues. Example: "I love that David is so hard working and ambitious, he is bound to be successful." Later: "David is always working. He never makes time for me. When he is home, he ignores me, watches TV, and goes to sleep." The author asserts that she subconsciously chose David because he has characteristics that are similar to a parent who also didn't give her the attention she yearned for. She wants to be healed from this scarring experience and can only accomplish this by revisiting the wound through a monogamous relationship. David also chose her for the same purpose, to heal his childhood wounds. Perhaps he had a lazy father who didn't work much and therefore, David feels he must overcompensate for his father's failings. The author says that by consciously acknowledging these issues, using dialogue, and committing to behavior change motivated by love for your partner, is the only way each can heal. The author then tells readers how to begin this dialogue/healing process whether single or in a relationship.
Now, this sounds a little fruity, I know. The author, however, makes a strong case. He describes quite accurately what conflicts emerge within relationships and explains why. He also describes what happens if the power struggle continues -- either divorce or "acceptance of an unsatisfying but tolerable marriage." I encourage you to read it for yourself. Here are a few quotes that I thought were most interesting or telling about the current state of marriage in our country and the author's ideas that I thought that rang true.
p19 "The social fabric of our country is unraveling before our eyes, and the disintegration is directly traceable to the crisis in the family, specifically to the quality of marriages... Underlying the crisis is a critical overlooked fact: the long-stagnant institution of marriage has undergone a revolution in the last century. But our minds and our hearts have not kept up with this change. Because we have not reoriented ourselves to the revised agenda of marriage, we're making a mess of it."
p23 "Divorce may allow people to escape from bad marriages, but until we take steps to ensure good marriages, to facilitate individual happiness and fulfillment, until we learn what we're about, we will continue to have desperate singles, joyless marriages, troubled children, and a society becoming more dysfunctional by the decade."
p43 "A feeling of aliveness is what we're after with our cars and condos and boats and gourmet food, our designer clothes and recreational sex and skin flicks and skydiving, our deafening music and jogging and walks on the beach and TV and movies. Materialism, hedonism, greed, self-centeredness--all hallmarks of the American way--are getting a bad name these days... all this compulsive activity really represents... is that we live in a world, and in relationships, that don't allow us to feel truly alive. And if we don't feel alive, we feel like we're doing to die. So we do something, buy something, binge on something, take drugs, drink, run twenty miles, get laid, turn up the music."
p44 "We spend so much of our lives trying to find, or to create, meaning in our lives when what we truly want is to feel the fullness of our own experience, to feel the pulsation of our aliveness. For so many years I doggedly, intellectually addressed questions of life's meaning and now I realize that's what you do when you don't feel fully alive. Our purposes and goals are a substitute , a sublimation for feeling alive and joyful."
p178-179 "What is true is that the human psyche, male or female, is not static: it evolves. And what we are currently witnessing is the emergence of the feminine. This emergence parallels--and is a continuation of--the evolution of our society from monarchy to democracy and the parallel emergence of the individual from the collective, which I spoke of in Chapter 2). Individual freedom, a relatively recent concept in our psychohistorical evolution, has in reality amounted to a feeling of the masculine only. The creation story of woman being fabricated from the rib of man reflects the patriarchal society from which it emerged; it is a social rather than a biological reality. But the feminine has remained "embedded" in the masculine and is only now emerging in its own, separate but equal, right. This emergence of the feminine has stirred up considerable alarm and discomfort, particularly on the role-embedded males.... The genders are trading places these days, maintaining the polarity, when what is needed is synthesis."
p180 "Gender is an ethical issue as well. Inequality is unethical, and we human beings have an innate drive for equality that parallels the drive for individual freedom on which our country was founded... Since inequalities are inconsistent with individual freedom, the drive for the equality of the feminine is a natural phenomenon... the next step in the process by with the human psyche is evolving... ultimately to a partnership of equals... moving toward the integration of the masculine and feminine, societally and individually."
p295 "To risk the self in the service of the other is to save the self."
Seeing the forest through the trees:
p301 "We must use our capacity for knowing and self-correction to consciously cooperate with Nature's impulse for self-repair and self-completion. Through its reflective consciousness--science, psychology, sociology, theology, and other disciplines--nature is revealing the tears we have made in the tapestry of being, and seeking to enlist our participation in the healing of our species and the planet. To cooperate with this fantastic project is to participate in the healing of the universe."