I never expect much from a "True Crime" book from a charity shop. I pick it up with a morbid curiosity without setting my expectations high, yet this book still managed to astound me with its incompetency.
Despite being updated for 2022, you can tell this books original release was in the 90's. Martingale frequently references psychoanalysis as if it is indisputable fact, and attempts to rationalise and understand these serial killers motivations/causes without really considering any broader issues.
The author frequently takes serial killers at their word, quoting histories from their childhoods as if they are indisputable fact, even when these have been questioned by the police and courts. Frequently when googling the cases discussed I found that a lot of important detail had been left out from the author's analysis.
This all could have led to an easy 2* or 3*, the book was readable with a broad range of cases covered with differing motivations, timescales, and countries. However. This author cannot seem to escape her own bigotry. This book is incredibly racist, transphobic, misogynistic and homophobic.
While the majority of serial (and cannibal killers) are white men, this author cannot resist calling the people of Papa New Guinea in the contemporary era as "less developed", as well as blaming the entirety of Japan and Japanese culture for the cult fame of a particular killer- despite the fact that numerous of the interview sources were American journalists interviewing him! There is also references to Native Americans being cannibals- which is just a blatant lie from when white settlers attempted to paint them as "savages".
The author (in 2022!) refers to a (possibly) transgender individual as "transvestite" and entertains the idea that this "perversion" could be the cause for his murderous tendencies. The word "perversion" is also used frequently for anything from kinky/gay sex to serial murder and cannibalism.
Gay people are often referred to as "homosexuals" and this is also frequently parroted as a motivating factor in serial killers- as well as mothers being blamed for their murderous and violent children (but funnily enough never the fathers!). There is even a specific chapter about how mothers (!) are to blame if their children are murderous- even when they themselves are victims to their violence!
These arguments are also applied inconsistently: when discussing Jeffery Dahmer, the author argues his home life was not a contributing factor as many children come from broken homes, while another killer whose mother (purportedly) would have nasty arguments with him is to blame for his murderous tendencies (despite the very courts arguing that he was a danger to her and he should not be placed in her custody!). Never in this are their absent/inconsistent fathers even remotely questioned as being a contributing factor to their sons' violent acts.
There is also an entire chapter which appears to be no more than a tangent for the author to express her disgust for the porn industry. There are a few important points about violence against women- but the author is blinded by her own bias. For example, many serial killers enjoy extreme pornography and the author argues that with the rise of the internet is has become easier to access violent and illegal forms pornography - which is contributing to the normalisation of violence against women. On the surface, I would not inherently disagree with this argument. However, a few pages previously the author had argued that serial killers were on the decline- making it clear that many of the authors conclusions are not from an analysis of the facts, but simply from her own feelings. Martingale also has an odd few paragraphs where she equates teenage girls who post "scantily clad selfies" with the increasing presence of the porn industry, and therefore with violence against women. It is not clear what Martingale means by "scantily clad" but the slut shaming of literal teenagers is just bizarre.
And it is this bigotry which slips this book to a 1* as it perpetuates harmful stereotypes and those who read less critically could easily take the author's bigoted opinions as scientific fact. There are many better True Crime novels out there which are much less biased and bigoted