What do you think?
Rate this book
The Divine Christology of the Apostle Paul: Retrospect and Prospect
The last fifty years of Pauline scholarship have provided numerous insights to both the academy and the church. Some of those most important discussions have related to the question of Paul's view of Christ with respect to his divinity. While the landscape is rich with scholarly findings, it can be overwhelming to navigate the complex lines of argumentation and the interactions between various key scholars. In The Divine Christology of the Apostle Paul , biblical scholars Chris Bruno, John Lee, and Thomas Schreiner explore the more detailed and often perplexing conversations concerning the divinity of Christ, bringing helpful guidance and clarity to scholars' various articulations, including those After offering a cohesive and constructive understanding of such landmark studies, they then provide their own insights through the exegetical study of key New Testament passages related to Paul's Christology. Filled with helpful charts, appendixes, and study aids, The Divine Christology of the Apostle Paul is an essential guide for any student, pastor, or scholar looking for an insightful distillation of this key dimension of Pauline studies.
256 pages, Paperback
Published May 28, 2024
2 people are currently reading
28 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
September 29, 2024
Summary: On recent scholarship considering how Paul reconciled monotheism and the divinity of Jesus.
Why did Paul write of Jesus in terms reserved for God? How could a strict monotheistic Jew like Paul call Jesus “Lord” and worship him along with God the Father? While we may take this for granted, for devout Jews, Paul’s language is startling. From where did he get this idea?
Since the early 1900’s, Wilhelm Bousset’s ideas dominated the discussions of these questions. He “argued that early Christian devotion to Jesus originated from a Hellenistic setting where pagan religious influences such as Hellenistic mystery religions were more readily available to and accepted by Jesus-followers” (p.7). Rudolph Bultmann, one of the most prominent New Testament scholars of the twentieth century, promoted Bousset’s contention. The authors of this work engage the work of more recent scholars who argue for the early and Jewish origins of the high Christology of Paul and other early Christians.
Part One: Recent Proposals for Pauline Divine Christology
In part 1, the authors consider the proposals of Richard Bauckham, Larry Hurtado, Chris Tilling, and N. T. Wright. Bauckham proposes a divine identity paradigm. He notes how Paul and other NT writers include Jesus in God’s unique identity as sole creator, sovereign, and worthy of worship, as revealed in the Old Testament. Hurtado focuses in on the corporate worship paradigm. He observes that corporate worship and public devotion is offered to Jesus along with God the Father as clear evidence of Jesus divine status in the eyes of Paul.
Tilling argues for a Christ-relation paradigm. He points to the parallels of language for the relationship of YHWH and Israel in the Old Testament with that used of the relationship of Christ and believers. Finally, Wright sees a YHWH’s return paradigm. Citing the OT promises that YHWH will return to Zion, he argues that Christ’s fulfillment of these promises is Paul’s basis for a high Christology.
After outlining each of the proposals and commending their contribution, the authors note a few problems. One is that the proposals, focused as they are, fail to integrate all the evidence. Relatedly, they also fail to integrate Christology within Paul’s larger theological concerns. Finally, the authors believe these proposals fail to consider Paul’s presuppositions about scripture as divine revelation. This last criticism does not seem warranted, knowing something of the writing of these scholars.
Part Two: Exegetical Analysis for Pauline Divine Christology
The second part of the work offers an exegetical attempt by the authors to formulate Paul’s divine Christology. They treat the relevant Pauline passages under three headings: 1) Jesus, the One Lord of Israel, 2) Jesus, the Incarnate God Who Humbled Himself as Man, and 3) Jesus, the Ruler and Sovereign of Creation and New Creation. They weigh relevant OT and Second Temple influences and engage the work of the previously discussed scholars. A final chapter considers biblical texts that have been used to argue against a high Christology, namely I Corinthians 15:24-28 and Romans 1:3-4.
Afterword and Appendices
The main part of this work reflects the efforts of Chris Bruno and John Lee to summarize and engage recent work demonstrating the early and Jewish roots of Paul’s divine Christology. But the after matter has treasures of its own. First is an afterword by Thomas R. Schreiner develops further the ideas of Jesus’s Lordship, including the scholarship of David Capes, the prayers to Jesus found in Paul, other places where God and Christ are spoken of in parallel, and the trinitarian dimensions to be found in Paul. This last is an important corrective in a work that might be critiqued for a binatarian emphasis!
Appendix I then deals with David Capes and seven other scholars who have also contributed to discussions related to divine Christology in Paul. Appendix II offers a tabular review of the content of the book. Finally, Appendix III is a helpful introduction on Second Temple Jewish writings with a bibliography of additional resources.
Concluding Comments
One of the popular criticisms of Christianity is the idea that “Jesus became God” and that this was a late development that would have been unacceptable for monotheistic Jews. While not a direct response to this critique, this book undercuts that contention. The authors show a recent, significant scholarly consensus for the early and Jewish roots of divine Christology in Paul. In addition, this work offers a helpful survey of that scholarship for those who wish to pursue these questions further. And Bruno and Lee offer their own constructive exegetical Pauline Christology to further the discussion.
____________________
Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.
Why did Paul write of Jesus in terms reserved for God? How could a strict monotheistic Jew like Paul call Jesus “Lord” and worship him along with God the Father? While we may take this for granted, for devout Jews, Paul’s language is startling. From where did he get this idea?
Since the early 1900’s, Wilhelm Bousset’s ideas dominated the discussions of these questions. He “argued that early Christian devotion to Jesus originated from a Hellenistic setting where pagan religious influences such as Hellenistic mystery religions were more readily available to and accepted by Jesus-followers” (p.7). Rudolph Bultmann, one of the most prominent New Testament scholars of the twentieth century, promoted Bousset’s contention. The authors of this work engage the work of more recent scholars who argue for the early and Jewish origins of the high Christology of Paul and other early Christians.
Part One: Recent Proposals for Pauline Divine Christology
In part 1, the authors consider the proposals of Richard Bauckham, Larry Hurtado, Chris Tilling, and N. T. Wright. Bauckham proposes a divine identity paradigm. He notes how Paul and other NT writers include Jesus in God’s unique identity as sole creator, sovereign, and worthy of worship, as revealed in the Old Testament. Hurtado focuses in on the corporate worship paradigm. He observes that corporate worship and public devotion is offered to Jesus along with God the Father as clear evidence of Jesus divine status in the eyes of Paul.
Tilling argues for a Christ-relation paradigm. He points to the parallels of language for the relationship of YHWH and Israel in the Old Testament with that used of the relationship of Christ and believers. Finally, Wright sees a YHWH’s return paradigm. Citing the OT promises that YHWH will return to Zion, he argues that Christ’s fulfillment of these promises is Paul’s basis for a high Christology.
After outlining each of the proposals and commending their contribution, the authors note a few problems. One is that the proposals, focused as they are, fail to integrate all the evidence. Relatedly, they also fail to integrate Christology within Paul’s larger theological concerns. Finally, the authors believe these proposals fail to consider Paul’s presuppositions about scripture as divine revelation. This last criticism does not seem warranted, knowing something of the writing of these scholars.
Part Two: Exegetical Analysis for Pauline Divine Christology
The second part of the work offers an exegetical attempt by the authors to formulate Paul’s divine Christology. They treat the relevant Pauline passages under three headings: 1) Jesus, the One Lord of Israel, 2) Jesus, the Incarnate God Who Humbled Himself as Man, and 3) Jesus, the Ruler and Sovereign of Creation and New Creation. They weigh relevant OT and Second Temple influences and engage the work of the previously discussed scholars. A final chapter considers biblical texts that have been used to argue against a high Christology, namely I Corinthians 15:24-28 and Romans 1:3-4.
Afterword and Appendices
The main part of this work reflects the efforts of Chris Bruno and John Lee to summarize and engage recent work demonstrating the early and Jewish roots of Paul’s divine Christology. But the after matter has treasures of its own. First is an afterword by Thomas R. Schreiner develops further the ideas of Jesus’s Lordship, including the scholarship of David Capes, the prayers to Jesus found in Paul, other places where God and Christ are spoken of in parallel, and the trinitarian dimensions to be found in Paul. This last is an important corrective in a work that might be critiqued for a binatarian emphasis!
Appendix I then deals with David Capes and seven other scholars who have also contributed to discussions related to divine Christology in Paul. Appendix II offers a tabular review of the content of the book. Finally, Appendix III is a helpful introduction on Second Temple Jewish writings with a bibliography of additional resources.
Concluding Comments
One of the popular criticisms of Christianity is the idea that “Jesus became God” and that this was a late development that would have been unacceptable for monotheistic Jews. While not a direct response to this critique, this book undercuts that contention. The authors show a recent, significant scholarly consensus for the early and Jewish roots of divine Christology in Paul. In addition, this work offers a helpful survey of that scholarship for those who wish to pursue these questions further. And Bruno and Lee offer their own constructive exegetical Pauline Christology to further the discussion.
____________________
Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.
October 11, 2024
This book is an overview of scholarship on recent proposals for divine Christology. The most helpful sections are the overviews of Bauckham, Hurtado, Tilling, and Wright as well as the authors' evaluations of each articulation. The Biblical analysis in later chapters is ok. The appendix on other big contributions was also helpful. This is a great concise resource to get the major ideas without needing to read the big works.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews