Put simplest, “The Failures” is a novel that feels tailor-made for me, with style and substance; plot development, misdirection, and mystery; and characters and (most memorably) worldbuilding that hooked me immediately and kept me coming back for more - wishing there was more even still - and has me continually mad that I had other reading obligations that put it on pause repeatedly. Every time I began reading “The Failures” again - after pausing for a couple weeks before Part 2, or a week before Part 3, or several more days before Part 4 - I found myself instantly transported back to the Wanderlands and torn between binging the book (which I ultimately did; a more addictively readable book this could hardly be in my mind) and reading slowly to savor it (which I 100% will be doing on a re-read.)
In fact, “The Failures” is such a slam dunk - or perhaps homerun - execution that not only am I absolutely certain I will reread this book, I may just end up doing the “Oh, let’s re-read this ahead of Book 2’s release, whenever that is”, even though I basically never do that kind of thing. I WANT to re-read the book right now, though I can reasonably assume I’d wear out my desire to return to the world if I did that so soon.
So where do I actually begin with my praises for the debut of the Wanderlands trilogy by Benjamin Liar?
Well, I suppose I’ll just start with the first thing that struck me as fantastic: worldbuilding. Put simply, if worldbuilding - as broad a category of storytelling as it may be - is anything you are interested in, you have to read this book. You just have to; I don’t write the rules. The way details of the world slowly open and expand and come to light through the course of the whole novel is addictively enticing. Part 1 especially had me so enthralled as to the state of the world, how it got to be this way, how the different parts of it fit together, and so much more….The truth is I can’t rightly express just how masterful Liar’s worldbuilding is. The Wanderlands is one of the richest worlds I’ve ever had the pleasure of exploring in a book, and every aspect of it is just so cool.
Tied alongside the worldbuilding is the lore and implicit history of the Wanderlands. Liar drops clues and reveals bits of information all throughout the book, but I feel like *the* secrets of the world are still waiting to be discovered! I don’t feel cheated out of anything, either - I’m just loving what was fed to my overactive little brain and what else I get to guess at, including what may or may not appear or be revealed as the series continues. Silver, twistcraft, the Nine, Deadsmiths, Giants, the Land of Forest, the Keep, the DARKNESS: everything is just so cool, and handled in just the right ways for me to stay hooked without a second guess ever.
There’s an inherent mystery to “The Failures” that makes a large portion of its worth and intrigue. The worldbuilding and lore are central to this mystery - this WONDER - and they alone make this book worth experiencing. Again, if worldbuilding is your thing, you just kind of have to read this book.
As a miscellaneous point, I also appreciate the fact that Liar calls out Stephen King’s “The Dark Tower” series as an influence (from which he stole) for aspects of the worldbuilding. If you’ve read the series, it’s pretty obvious what parts are borrowed, but since I love DT, I just thought it was really cool. If you pay attention, you may find some other influences mixed in that make the Wanderlands a world truly its own - something unique and special, with a dark (pun intended) history to make any reader wrinkle their brains a little in curiosity. The worldbuilding is so damn good, I’m almost - ALMOST - sad that the Wanderlands is only planned as a trilogy, for it seems a shame for a world this good to see so relatively little screen (page) time. (Sure, spin-offs are an option, but still. The world we know about on the page IS utilized surprisingly fully, so maybe it actually makes complete sense….)
The mystery is not merely relegated to the lore and worldbuilding, however. The plot and character construction of this book is so incredibly intricate and intentional that I have a hard time believing it’s real sometimes. Outside of 1 chapter in the beginning of Part 2 feeling more appropriate at the end of Part 1, and 1 POV in Parts 3-4 perhaps being a little bit repetitive (to me; certainly a favorite of a lot of others), I have 0 complaints about the construction and execution of plot-arcs and POV allocation or anything similar.
“The Failures” features an ever-changing POV sequencing, where every single chapter switches to a different POV (no, not every chapter is a unique POV; I just mean that never does one storyline have more than 1 chapter in a row at a time), and Liar balances between at least 3 POVs in each part, usually 4, and technically even 5 at one point via technicality. I have to say it’s surprising that Liar managed to keep the balance so…er, *balanced* between the POVs despite the consistently rotating narrators throughout the whole book. I’m grateful, too, that he made this decision since I have a book I just finished outlining recently that features a similar rotating-narrator-with-every-chapter design that I was wondering about completely overhauling and restructuring but that I’m now confident CAN work, if it is written well enough.
But Liar’s rotation of POVs isn’t just a random artistic decision made for the hell of it either. It is, in fact, an intricately complex layering of timeline and character reveals and plots coinciding. So complex, even, that aside from that 1 chapter I hint at in early Part 2, you could hardly rearrange any of the rest of the chapters of this entire book without spoiling the coolest reveals that just litter the entire back half. Second guessing what events took place when is a large part of the intrigue of the first…3/4 for me, and it is a mystery that permeates much of the reading experience. I found myself considering the order and technicalities of the timeline with virtually every chapter as new information slowly shifted my understanding of the events going on.
But before I get too ahead of myself: I could rave all day about just how impressive the parsing of information and the ordering of the timelines and POVs and everything is in “The Failures”, but I’d be too likely to go into spoilers and that’s not worth spoiling in a review. Just trust me: if you love it when an author respects you enough to put the pieces together before he reveals what it is he’s about to reveal, Liar does it with the best of them in this book, and you won’t be disappointed. Suffice it to say that I fully intend to reread “The Failures” someday - and likely before the second book of the Wanderlands comes out. I’m not one to engage in this practice typically because of my slow reading speed and tight schedule, but this book is worth it. I’ve read books that I want to reread someday, but “The Failures” I fully intend to read again some manner of soon; it’s just so obvious to me that the little details I missed or forgot over the month-and-a-half I read this (when I would’ve liked to have it done in just a couple weeks) will make a reread go SO HARD.
I can’t wait for that.
As for the characters and POVs themselves, I think the majority of final opinions on “The Failures” will likely come down to whether or not the characters and dialogue (especially the dialogue) clicks for any individual reader. Furthermore, because there’s…like 7 or 8 POVs, consolidated to right around 5 separate storylines to pick apart and put back together, there’s plenty of opportunity for one or two to not work for some people. Of course, this is a pretty typical aspect of multi-POV stories - it’s one of the mainstays of epic fantasy (which, come to think, I should actually talk about genre briefly a bit later in the review) - but I think it’s of particular note here.
I’d say the most common POV I’ve seen some people have trouble with so far is Deadsmith, which is my personal least favorite. This is because the POV is a little repetitive and so can feel a tad boring in a couple of moments. (Don't worry too much though, as there are just as many readers for whom the The Deadsmith is their favorite.) The POVs of The Monsters and The Killers have really snappy dialogue that people might not take to, but I personally loved it. In fact, the dialogue is a large part of why The Killers is easily my favorite POV - and storyline - of the bunch.
I think Liar nails the fundamental concept of “character” as it pertains to modern sci-fi/fantasy (SFF) literature - due in no small part to the mysteries abound associated with the plotting. Everybody serves their purpose in the story, allowing the narrative and the world to breathe and shine without it being so unfathomably massive that it’s impossible to keep track of things. Hell, the world has the same dynamic relationship with the pacing of plot and character reveals in that the pieces of it click together more and more as the story goes on. But the characters are the lynchpin in my mind. Everything about “The Failures” kind of hinges on the relationships and reveals associated with the characters and the goals and actions of them. The references to and utilization of the Wanderlands' gods (and similar) also really aids in making “The Failures” feel like a story of history and mythos rather than just a generic fantasy, brilliantly offset by characters and dialogue that actually feel real to how people in the modern world interact.
On that point: I have mentioned that some people will not like the dialogue. I admit, it is an acquired taste…but if you happen to be like me and just about every person I’ve talked to in real life (outside of my religious associations), you probably swear. A lot. Like, A LOT a lot. So much that you frequently consider maybe toning it down a bit because it’s kind of a problem - the kind of swearing that even the mildest frustrations generate the “fuck” word once or twice in every sentence (dependent, of course, upon how complex that sentence is). Well, if this is indeed you, the dialogue of “The Failures” is probably the most natural dialogue in the world. Is there a curse thrown in now and again that maybe doesn’t need to be there? Sure. But the visceral nature of the vast majority of it just felt *right*. It flowed and felt the most like real-life conversations I have on a daily basis out of most books I read. You know how movies and books often feel scripted? Like, they emulate the ideal course of specific types of human interactions, but you can tell they’re crafted beyond the ability of regular people to naturally say or express on the fly? They’re streamlined versions of what our messy thoughts are trying to scramble together in the moment, and refined to be better. “The Failures” decides to do that at times, but it also spends a lot of time just letting the characters speak like your averagely crass person in the 2020s would speak, and I personally love that.
But I should circle back around to something I’ve forgotten to bring up so far: the variety in the POVs. I meant to bring this up earlier but I got sidetracked (go figure, KC getting long-winded in a book review, who would’ve thought?).
Every POV in this book is so distinctly different from the rest that I suspect every POV has the potential to be somebody’s ride-or-die favorite character, for all their own reasons. The Lost Boys are like your middle grade book heroes without the things that make Middle Grade of YA books what they are; The Monsters are like your clueless young-ish adults (actually young adults (again, -ish), like in their mid-20s, maybe late-20’s I’d guess, not teenagers) just trying to figure out how they fit in this world they find themselves in; The Convox and -Cabal are your set-dressing and auxiliary lore/setting-enhancing POVs that expand everything else; The Killers are like your average YA book heroes who've grown jaded and snarky after 20 years since their hero days. There are more, but I’ll leave it at that. These are all distinct, and have a completely unique dynamic that was my hook and addiction every time I picked this book up.
Finally, I want to conclude while discussing a little of the genre-classification of “The Failures”. While I don’t always care for the distinctions, I think this book actually warrants a conversation, because it is Science-Fantasy…but not in the ways most science-fantasy books are. I won’t pull from too many examples, but I will contrast the Wanderlands with Sun Eater.
Sun Eater is science fantasy in that it is essentially a science-fiction story, with a science fiction (space opera) setting, and thus there exists concepts and technology, etc. that most would associate with a sci-fi novel. But the writing and accessibility of it falls a little closer to the fantasy side. In short, Sun Eater is a sci-fi series that fantasy fans will have no issues enjoying.
In contrast, the Wanderlands is very much a fantasy book - epic fantasy, that is - with portions of worldbuilding and setting and lore that fall heavily into the sci-fi realm. Some of the ideas are sci-fi influenced, but they’re not the type of sci-fi that fantasy fans will be averse to, because it just feels like a unique framing for the magic and worldbuilding they’re already used to expecting. There is some sci-fi *stuff* in “The Failures" - including in a lot of areas that have yet to fleshed out yet - but just about everything from the plotting to the characters to even those sci-fi concepts themselves based on their construction in context feel like an epic fantasy reading experience. Thus, the average sci-fi fan who hasn’t read or especially isn’t really interested in fantasy might have a hard time with this book; but fantasy fans at the very least should have an absolute blast.
To borrow a line from Liar himself: “I sure as fuck did.”