I read the description and laughed at the phrase "fresh truths". Probably half of the truths inside this book made an appearance in the previous work: "Too soon old, too late smart". Perhaps Livingston felt it was necessary to elaborate on things mentioned in passing.
Some define happiness as the ratio between accomplishment and expectations, and it must be noted that both are self-defined. We can be proud of the smallest achievements, if we so choose.
We do not release transgressors from accountability by forgiving, we free ourselves from the burden of bitterness.
We are entitled to receive only as much as we are prepared to give.
Anger begets anger. Break old destructive patterns.
Rather than medication, Livingston prefers to challenge his patients to relinquish passivity, stop waiting for answers outside themselves, mobilise their courage and determination, and try to discover what changes will bring them closer to others and to the people they want to be.
Perhaps the entire self-help industry is dependent on a 'life is hard, then you die' world-view, in which people will necessarily need a lot of help and guidance. The problem with that is that it keeps expectations low and stress levels high.
The Chaplain Corps was a wholly owned subsidiary of the military and concerned itself with providing a kind of theological justification for the task at hand, instead of simply ministering to the souls of the soldiers.
People engage in what turns out in most cases to be a disappointing quest for the person who will save them with the unqualified approval and support that is our deepest wish. Seldom does this search take the form of asking the really important question: "What can I make of myself that would make me worthy to give and receive such love?"
It is only when we are too obtuse, frightened or distracted to ask the important questions that we are truly lost.
Above all, we might do well to cultivate a certain humility about our particular conception of what constitutes an ethical life and be willing to accept those who peacefully disagree with us.
It requires the certainty of the true believer to justify the forcible imposition of one's view of the world.
Each of our stories deserves to be told, and yet to whom can we tell them?
The act of listening has the effect of establishing and reaffirming our concern about the other person.
It is a commentary on our close relationships that it is so unclear to many whether their spouses are supporters or adversaries.
Society has a very narrow and misguided definition of heroism. Many do not choose to die, (whether in combat or otherwise, they were simply unfortunate) Our heroes are our role models when it comes to the hard choices, so we should choose who we look up to carefully.
Knowledge requires the assimilation of information into a framework that promotes understanding.
To criticise this country when its (always temporary) leadership violates the core values of individual worth and human dignity is a profoundly patriotic act. Those who endorse the idea of "my country, right or wrong" are subversives who would use the flag to blindfold us all.
Writing one's own obituary is a good self-reflection tool, especially when we are still young enough to act upon our regrets.