I was pleased to find this recent biography of Abigail Adams. Using as source material her vast legacy of letters that she either wrote to John Adams or other family and friends, this was an engaging and readable biography whose only Achilles' heel was how sloppy it was at times.
Given that I am used to reading about people whose lives are not well documented or who did not give much insight into their feelings, it was fun to read about someone who did pour her heart into her letters and let her thoughts be known. I am also glad the author avoided the tendency of some biographers to narrate a scene and put thoughts into Abigail's head, preferring to let Abigail speak for herself through her letters and rather poignantly at times.
What emerges is a portrait of a strong, intelligent woman who loved her family and her country. She was quite the business woman, keeping the family financially afloat through running a business and learning about how to make good investments while John was off building a new nation. She was also very much John's confidant and advisor and I love stories about egalitarian marriages even during times where this was not recognized in law (something I feel Abigail chaffed at and tried to get around as the mere existence of her last will and testament suggests). And it was interesting getting insights into the conflicts and frustrations of a woman who was intelligent and wanted her daughter to have more educational opportunities than she did but also accepted the harsh reality of the times that they lived in. In light of the lack of opportunities she butted against, I was very glad that she got to spend some time in Europe and enjoyed reading about her experiences there. And it was also fun to read Abigail's thoughts on the Empire dresses that became popular in the period after the Revolutionary war.
Abigail comes off as likeable and relatable, especially during these contentious times in our modern political history. In the feuds conducted Abigail and John conducted through letters you can see a slower paced social media brawl and while I see some people in mental health maintain the opinion that our modern maladies are very recent, Abigail had both an alcoholic brother and an alcoholic son and mentioned that England had an appallingly high suicide rate. Aside from how fast our modern society moves I do not see that we are that different.
I do wish the author had done more in terms of background information and organization and at times the book was quite sloppy. The author glossed over John Adams's background entirely even when things became relevant. For instance, he talks about John Adams being inoculated for small pox, a controversial procedure, at the beginning of the book. I did wonder at John Adams's reason for getting inoculated and why Abigail didn't. Towards the middle of the book Abigail's inoculation was discussed as well as her reasons for not getting it done earlier, and then towards the end of the book the author mentioned that John Adams's mother was the granddaughter of the man who invented smallpox inoculations (which I assume is how John knew a lot about the procedure and was a factor in his decision to be inoculated). And while the fact that Abigail's family of origin owned slaves was mentioned and how this helped her to realize that slavery was bad was touched upon, he never did explicitly go into whether or not John and Abigail owned slaves (which they did not) though he did go into Abigail's struggles to find paid farm workers during the war. Subjects I was interested in seeing fleshed out would be dropped abruptly and radically new tangents introduced abruptly and at times the book was repetitive.
Towards the end I started to see passages like this: "In past years, Abigail would have wasted no time in traveling to Nabby no matter where she was living, or ask Nabby to travel to Quincy. But in 1813 both parties were unable to travel to the other. Faced with that situation, Nabby, her children John and Caroline, and Colonel Smith's sister Nancy traveled the three hundred miles in a very bumpy carriage to reach Quincy..." If Nabby was able to reach Quincy then why the sentence about how neither of them could travel to each other?
My enjoyment of reading this book did not diminish because of the sloppiness and even with the confusing passages I was able to make sense of it, but I did wonder if the author was running against a tight deadline. Generally while reading biographies I am ready for things to be wrapped up in the end, but this one left me wanting more and wishing that some things had been better fleshed out and organized. I am glad to have this biography but I also would have been happy to wait a few more months to allow the author polish it more. It could have been a five star review with some spit and polish especially when you account for the fact that the disorganization did not dampen my enthusiasm for the book. And even with the flaws of this book I would highly recommend it and am glad I read it.