What needs to be cleared out first: Skrbina needs to pick less provocative titles, and he needs to write introductions to his book better,
This title caught my attention mostly because I was always conflicted on the historicity of Christ, and this book would seem to offer a different perspective. Despite the current consensus, I was not convinced about the current historical evidence of Christ, it seems very lacking when you take out Jewish sources out of the equation (and one would surely expect plenty of say Roman accounts of Jesus). HOWEVER, I was always conflicted by question of why would the Jews invent a figure that is universally likable by everyone, yet "anti-semitic" in spirit (i.e. not racially supremacist, non-genocidal, anti-usury, etc.)
Skrbina does really bad job of writing introduction to his book, because I honestly expected to read the biggest dogshit of my life, because he put focus mostly on disproving the miracles which suddenly stopped occurring with the dawn of cameras.
However, later on he presents lots of historical facts on the table and connects them together in a neat way, and puts up his thesis, which is that the Christ myth was invented by St. Paul, ex-Saul, ardent Zealot/Jewish nationalist that switched from hunting and killing Christians into being one, and his gang to undermine the Roman rule.
He brings up Jewish worldview reflected in the Old Testament (which he describes as "by Jews, about Jews, for Jews"), and how their hatred for everyone non-Jewish always reflected, and how it ultimately reflected badly for the Jews themselves. So, the core of his thesis is how Christ myth was invented as the product of inner power struggle within the Jewish elites, and how they did a little flip in the New Testament (which now becomes "by Jews, about Jews, for non-Jews"), in which, seeing the failure of the Jewish revolt which resulted in the destruction of the Temple, but still unified by the anti-Roman creed, they seek leveling world-rejecting religion.
During the process of explaining his thesis, he brings up lots of historical tidbits about how Paul in his letters never references his Master (because his letters were written 40 years before the Gospels), provides interesting evidence into the ethnicity of Gospels authors, and how John and Luke's gospels were likely "antisemitic" because of the inner power struggle and criticism of current Jewish status quo, rather than real antisemitism later developed by Europeans.
The key difference between this book and say Nietzsche's Anti-Christ, is that Skrbina saw Jesus as crucified revolutionary - a wannabe Jewish king, whereas Nietzsche admired Jesus and held the view that Jesus was a hippy rabbi peace loving anarchist.
Overall, short but insightful little read, if you ignore the provocative title and don't get pissed off at shitty introduction.