What do you think?
Rate this book


256 pages, Kindle Edition
Published October 18, 1972
"You do not live in reality. Political reality."Four years deep into my commitment to reading Nin's diary (leastwise the parts that make her look clairvoyant and don't open her up to being sued for libel), I've finally figured out what the draw is. Much as people who bark on and on about not owning a television are usually subscribed to 5+ streaming sites and other "lite" versions of the idiot box, while I can't say I've ever purchased a physical copy of a gossip rag, that's basically what this series of nonfictional treatises has been for me. I may only have the faintest glimmer of awareness of whatever thin white rich mogul is the latest splash in the trending pond due to my selective intake of Twitter and co., but when it comes to (white) literary shenanigans of the pre-1950s, I'll take whatever I can get of the Baldwin, the Vidal, the Kavan, and the Barnes. The unfortunate side effect of such a kind of consumption is that, while I mostly more than enjoy myself while the pages are turning, once the show is over and done, all I can think about is how Nin may be a glittering little engagement on many an occasion, but such barely makes up for her being an obdurate, obtuse, obnoxious, and obfuscating little fool just when you think she's learned her lesson. So, while she's still my choice of vehicle when it comes sidewinding around a certain portion of the 20th century Greats™ and all their exploits both exceptional and ribald, it's not like history has given me a lot of tolerable options in that regard. After this work, I'm still rather keen on getting to the next two volumes that I own and tracking down a copy of the very last one that I don't, but man. If there was anyone who would've greatly benefitted from being slapped in the face with the glove of an intrepid queer and challenged to a duel where she would have finally had to put her muster where her mouth was, it would've been Nin.
"Does your political reality make you understand human beings?"
He, the lonely one, has trusted woman for the first time, and we start the journey of our friendship, as badly loved children who raised themselves, both stronger and weaker by it.As always, Nin has a great way with words on many an occasion, some of which ring all too true today. (although I had to wonder what the ratio is of pearl to encrustation is when considering the sheer quantity of her writings). Unfortunately, all of that is caked in that kind of bourgeois noxiousness that has both never been powerless in the face of the slow and inevitable starvation of a neighbor's child and never been powerful enough to rescue every single starving adult she comes across. This means that I am forced to pick and choose what to take seriously when it comes to whatever she has to say about pretty much everything, for much as I delight in the sensual rills that her prose plunges into and the famous names and powerful figures that are dropped into her periphery like so many cut diamonds plinked into a bowl of champagne, her absolute refusal to not only connect the dots in the face of the realities of money, history, and habitus, but to continually get away with it, speaks more about her hidden financial resource of a husband than can be erased through even the stringiest amounts of censorship.
Everyone was at home with bottles from which they hoped to extract a gaiety bottled elsewhere.Of course, such today is more than fine for the typical reader who not only has access to the kind of resources that allows the development of an interest of such a figure as Nin, but also the inclination to pursue her as far as I have, so if you're wondering why you were led into a four star review and been given a two star bemoaning, mark it up to my constant need to qualify when it comes to such highfalutin cultural products such as this. If there were less people getting mad at Nin due to their ingrained puritanism and more criticizing her for LARPing through her life and her acquaintances and getting angry when her "homosexuals" and her "Negroes" and her "Orientals" refuse to fit in the boxes most conducive to her real person fanfiction, I wouldn't feel the need to spend more time critiquing than I do praising. I'm not looking to promote this work, but ensuring that, when a reader approaches this work, they're willing to take the good with the bad and comment on such appropriately. Critical stances that consist purely of cries "problematic" and/or "wholesome" are largely nothing more than the latest whitewashing scheme of sex-negative WASP types, and I have no interest to contributing to yet another puerile dichotomy of those who refuse to interpret their world as more than a mere slant between good and evil.
"I've given up the idea of absorbing you. You're too strong a personality."This is the shortest entry in Nin's series of published diaries, which from the first entry gradually decreased in length until this point, after which it will lengthen a tad during the fifth, dramatically shoot up in the sixth, and end in the seventh at the exact same page count as the first. This entry also covers the slimmest portion of years, four in number, than any of the diary entries contain in comparison to volume two's six and especially volume six's twelve, matched only by the first, whose 60% increase in volume can likely be chalked up to the buildup from all the years previous to the first entry. It's not as if Nin didn't revisit many of the personages and topics that I remember majorly occupying the previous volumes, but considering how badly the summary butchers this entry with its "where she defends young writers against the Establishment," aka bourgeoisies-ly queens around and otherwise mewls and pukes about being prevented from establishing healthy emotional bonds with men who are not and never will be interested in fucking her, and its "and her trip across the country in an old Ford to California and Mexico" which occupies the very last 10% of an already short work, I have to wonder how much else was systematically chopped. Vidal was fine and dandy with being mentioned in rather rigorous detail, but the one paragraph she devotes to Baldwin and how she can't become friends with him due to the "politics" of Jim Crow segregation in her new homeland has to make me wonder what other spiels she ranted off on. Anyway, yet another entry full of the kind of juicy details which you have to spend a lot of time ruining your eyesight over dead white boys and girls in order to truly relish, and the fact that I enjoyed myself even throughout all the nonsense doesn't mean I want to lead anyone in under false pretenses. I'm intent on finishing up this particular nonfictional series of Nin's, along with the first entry into her salacious "Unexpurgated" series, but once that's done, it'll take something more momentous than her legacy is probably capable of to draw me back. Like I said, much as her writing truly interests me, without her coterie of other notables, I'm doubtful I have stomached her la la wonderland "everything is Freud and nothing is Marx" paradigm as long as I have, or commit myself to another four years, at least, of revisits to her writing. An interesting figure of the 20th century, to be sure. But it's unlikely such would have been the case had she not acclimated so well to being bought and paid for throughout it.
"Why should you want to absorb anyone?"
A man who lives unrelated to other human beings dies. But a man who lives unrelated to himself also dies.