Engagingly written and had some interesting sections on history of guide books and anti-tourist sentiment in Barcelona and Hawai'i, but stayed superficial, got repetitive, and was entirely focused on famous destinations in Europe and Hawaii and a very specific type of travel by a specific subset of the white, western, wealthy demographic.
Was criticizing the stereotypical obnoxious "old tourist" that only visits tourist traps, but when describing a model "new tourist" got wishy-washy and vague.
Would've liked discussion or at least acknowledgment of all the other forms of travel besides the "top 10"/"best of"/grand tour/instagram stuff - no discussion at all of cruises, safaris, voluntourism, programs like doctors without borders, medical tourism, missionary work, more fraught destinations like Afghanistan or North Korea, favela tours, study abroad, sports/adventure focused or overland expeditions etc etc etc. Mentioned that hajj exists in a single sentence with 0 elaboration?? (0 mention of Chinese New year or golden week)
I get that tourism is a big subject, but "new tourist" as a term was left so vague it was meaningless. Some discussion of how these other types of travel are or aren't aligned with the actions of a "new tourist" would've helped define them.
Besides Saudi Arabia, a home in India, Angkor Wat, and single paragraph on the Great Barrier Reef, no study of destinations outside Europe and Hawai'i. By the end I was even doubting if this author has even been to Central or South America, Africa, or anywhere else in all of Asia & the Pacific. So weird to omit most of the world in a book about international travel!
Seemed written for the stereotypical NYT reader, not for me.
---
Edit: Adjusted rating down, thought about this more and kept thinking how disappointed I was. Was expecting an informative deep-dive into the tourist industry, and maybe suggestions how to travel more ethically, but this was basically just the author's travelogue and it seems the author is the exact sort of traveler that she derides. Author has not only the privilege to travel, but the platform of this book, so it's super frustrating to see it wasted on her sharing banal personal anecdotes!
Besides the limited scope of destinations, 2 other major omissions are bothering me -
(1) she seemed to have was mostly interviewed government officials, and random guides and tourists. If the author wanted to make a pro-tourism argument, where were the interviews with industry reps who could've offered hard numbers re: job creation and tax revenue? What about hearing from travel agencies like National Geographic, Viking River Cruises, G Adventures, OAT, etc? They must have fascinating insight into demographics, consumer demand for "off-the-beaten"/"authentic" experiences and what goes into creating itineraries.
(2) covid-19 is a weird elephant in the room. there's allusions to it, but given how clear-cut the effects of lockdowns were they really ought have been acknowledged more. Eg. something like the documentary "The Year Earth Changed" reveals how much we can unknowingly be causing harm by showing how natural environments bounced back when people were gone. where's her counter argument for that?
Such a huge and fascinating subject and this book just wastes the opportunity to actually explore it!