Perhaps I’ve now read too much Jim Harrison. These are three novellas, a form he fancies. The stories – well, two of them – are annoyingly familiar: a post-middle aged man who admires female butts, drinks enormous amounts of liquor, eats enormous amounts of food and will tell you the recipe of every meal, has a job or former job that enabled or required him to read an enormous amount so that he can opine about books and authors, likes to walk and sleep outdoors so that he has acquired a great deal of information about nature and allows him to feel superior about that, is friends with a dog, and is friends with someone who is damaged in some way to define a purity of spirit.
Now, I like Harrison, and have said so here. Maybe even sold some books. But the familiar form I’ve sketched above means his stories can be: a) familiar; and b) preachy.
One of the old farts goes to a mid-western restaurant:
These noble thoughts did not diminish my concern over a sign in the restaurant that simply said, “Fried Fish.” There had been a past, silly experience in Kansas when I never did find out what kind of fish was available. The waitress said, “You know, fish fish.” When I said that the ocean contained many types of fish she said, “This is Kansas,” closing off further discussion.
The problem is that Harrison told the exact same story in an earlier work. He plagiarized himself. I don’t think you should be allowed to do that.
There are times he can be wonderfully glib: At one time I revered D.H. Lawrence and might still if I re-read him, but then Henry Miller was more accurate. But then he could do this: I had just turned on NPR out of Marquette for music to soothe our abraded nerves, in this case Brahms whom I don’t care for. Even at this important juncture I must render my opinions! Well, actually, no, you don’t. If you tell me why you don’t like Brahms, I’ll listen. An opinion is a bumper sticker, and I don’t like traffic.
He does a similar thing regarding his political opinions, which he must render (!). He mentions “the contemptible Reagan” and refers to an aunt as “a loathsome Republican.” Now, see, I’m a “a pox on both their houses” kind of guy, detesting all political parties equally. If Harrison and I considered political issues, one by one, in a conversation in a bar or in a book, we might be in substantial agreement. But he’s not talking issues or whys here. He’s simply engaging in indictment by adjective. When he says, “contemptible Reagan” and “loathsome Republican” he means to be redundant. Sorry, I like more than that.
This collection includes another Brown Dog story. I like Brown Dog. I have read earlier Brown Dog stories and later Brown Dog stories. Liked them all. This one felt ‘mailed in’ though.
Maybe this was just a bad stretch for Harrison, or maybe this was just one too many for me. I have reached a new, important phase in my life. Like any other mammal I am trying, moment by moment, to think of what I should do next. This wasn’t it.