A slightly messy, incoherent book, 'The Violet Hour' didn't manage to grab me the way I wanted it to.
The prose here is undeniably beautiful in places, and the satirical explorations of the super-rich and the art world are good. These characters feel terrible and over-dramatic and unfortunately realistic all at the same time, and it combines into a solid tapestry of characters and atmospheres that you should love to hate. Unfortunately, I found the overall plot of the novel to be a disappointment that makes these characters less interesting than they deserve to be, and didn't allow me to invest in them the way I wanted to.
This novel feels like a collection of random scenes, cut and pasted together into a meaningless shape. I suspect this is the point; something to do with abstract art. But a novel is not a painting and a novel does unfortunately need to be about something, otherwise its all just meaningless words on a page. And it got to a point in The Violet Hour where I began to feel like I was just reading endless slightly overly dramatic prose without getting any story or feeling out of it.
The Violet Hour centres around a handful of characters in the international art world, all of whom have terribly depressing personal lives and are doing an infuriating load of nothing to fix it. These characters mostly walk in and out of chapters musing about art and doing very little else. The background crime plot, the mysterious death of a young man, could have been a saving grace, but I found it to be overly predictable - of course Thomas was there when he died, was anyone surprised by that? - and also unbelievable. Why does Lorna care so much about the death of a worker at a gallery she visited once, enough to convince herself he might even be her long-lost son? It feels unrealistic, these characters who are usually so vapid and shallow being suddenly so invested in someone that should mean nothing to them. It felt often like the author was just lazily trying to string together all these otherwise completely disconnected points of view for the sake of a vague sense of plot.
Additionally, so many things happen in this book that have no bearing on the narrative. At least half of the scenes feel completely unneeded. An awful lot of people are getting pushed into canals by the end of this book, and none of this ever means anything. Did Lorna kill that guy at the end? Did he drown? Who was he? What does this event mean for Lorna? We will never know, because Cahill isn't going to tell you and it's not important to the (lack of) plot, so I have to wonder why it's added in at all.
Other scenes are also sprinkled in and out for nothing but shock value. Lorna encounters a host of strange people in the streets for no reason other than to go "huh" and pad out the novel's word length. Thomas engages in a thousand bland kink scenes that I think are meant to show how disturbed his need for control is, but just feel false-edgy and immature. This novel is just a collection of shock-value scenes that create questions you will never get the answers to, followed up by a faux-emotional ending I don't care about because I'm not connected to any of these characters due to the novel's disjointedness. Is this a representation of the art world, or is it just over-thought writing that suffers from its own need to be different and artistic? I just don't think there's a lot of substance here, and I don't care enough about the art world to want to read 300 pages of descriptions of shitty abstract art and people having bad sex with no plot in between.
This book is lacking something, a very big something that feels obvious all the way through, though I couldn't tell you exactly what it is. It just feels a little soulless and uninteresting. My mind was constantly reaching out for something inside the text to connect with and finding nothing. Which, funnily enough, is exactly how I feel about abstract art. So maybe Cahill is actually a genius, but if so it's a boring kind of genius.