What do you think?
Rate this book
End the Stalemate: Move Past Cancel Culture to Meaningful Conversations
When was the last time you had a real & meaningful conversation? What has happened to our society?Differences of opinion have always been part of life. For decades, spouses, family members, co-workers, and neighbors have had spirited conversations about politics, social issues, religion, current events, and even sports. But what was different in the past is that these disagreements wouldn’t sever ties between family and friends.Today, we live in an argument culture that has let to nearly a third of people reporting they have stopped talking to a friend or family member due to a disagreement and nearly two-thirds of people saying they stay quiet about their beliefs due to the fear of offending others. From cyberbullying to hate speech, workplace harassment, demonizing political language, verbal abuse, and intolerance, the vast majority of us—eighty-seven percent—no longer feel safe in public places to share our opinions.Sean McDowell and Tim Muehlhoff seek to end this stalemate. They believe Christians are called to be God’s ambassadors, which necessarily entails the need to listen to those around us—especially people with diverse and different perspectives. In End the Stalemate, you will be able to revive the art of meaningful conversations by walking How to create connection and emotional awareness that opens the door for a fair exchange of ideas and effective communication;How to engage in perspective-taking, as illustrated in Scripture in a number of stories;How to speak the truth in love, from a biblical understanding;How to structure a conversation with those who hold diverse, and/or seemingly threatening, views; andHow to honor the words and perspective of those with whom we disagree.Yes, we live in cancel culture. But that doesn’t mean that we as Christians need to conform to our world. Instead, we can be a beacon of sanity that promotes meaningful conversations around what matters most in this life—and the next.
- GenresCulturalEvangelism
248 pages, Kindle Edition
Published June 18, 2024
19 people are currently reading
190 people want to read
About the author
Sean McDowell
143 books177 followersDr. Sean McDowell is a gifted communicator with a passion for equipping the church, and in particular young people, to make the case for the Christian faith. He connects with audiences in a tangible way through humor and stories while imparting hard evidence and logical support for viewing all areas of life through a Biblical worldview. Sean is an Assistant Professor in the Christian Apologetics program at Biola University.
Sean still teaches one high school Bible class, which helps give him exceptional insight into the prevailing culture so he can impart his observations poignantly to fellow educators, pastors, and parents alike.
Read more about Sean on his website.
Connect with Sean on Facebook.
Sean still teaches one high school Bible class, which helps give him exceptional insight into the prevailing culture so he can impart his observations poignantly to fellow educators, pastors, and parents alike.
Read more about Sean on his website.
Connect with Sean on Facebook.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 29 of 29 reviews
November 17, 2025
Had this book not been a required reading, I never would’ve given it the time of day. My thoughts upon glancing at the title were, “Cancel Culture? This book is about 10 years late to the party.” Here I stand pleasantly corrected.
The chapters discussing communication theory — my words not their’s — were very thought provoking for me. Probably nothing groundbreaking here for those that are well studied in this area, but that’s not me, so consider my ground broken.
The chapters discussing communication theory — my words not their’s — were very thought provoking for me. Probably nothing groundbreaking here for those that are well studied in this area, but that’s not me, so consider my ground broken.
December 18, 2024
Much needed. We need to build bridges with people, not walls.
November 12, 2024
It’s a good book. It is. It’s just a real bummer that 1) it needs to be written and 2) that the concepts within it will be revolutionary to people. Their main point is that to end the stalemates we have in contentious conversations, we have to move toward others, listen empathetically, treat them fairly, and respond kindly. So, in essence, be a good human. And yet I would readily admit I’ve needed these reminders and I know others I’d encourage to read this book. 3 stars just out of disappointment that we’re in a world that this is revolutionary book. Jesus help us.
May 21, 2024
Summary: Addresses how we move past impasses around disagreements to have meaningful conversations.
Our highly polarized cultural atmosphere has led to the breakdown of civil discourse, a rancorous political atmosphere, and sadly, friends and family who no longer talk to each other. It has led to a situation where many do not feel free to share their opinions in their families, workplaces, or in public discussions. It just doesn’t feel safe.
The authors of this book are both engaged in dialogue with those with whom they would disagree, including at times, each other! Sean McDowell, a professor of apologetics, frequently engages in discussions and debates with those who do not agree with his reasons for believing. Tim Muehlhoff is a professor of communication who directs the Winsome Communication Project. Both host podcasts focused on conversations with those who differ on important questions. This book, to which each have contributed chapters focuses on how we may both prepare to engage with those with whom we differ and how we may have those conversations in ways leading at very least to civil disagreement and perhaps growing mutual understanding.
They begin by contrasting a transmission versus ritual view of communication. The transmission view has problems with myside bias that doesn’t reckon with counterarguments and often leaves everyone more entrenched. The ritual view looks for points of commonality where there is an emotional connection, sympathy, with the views of another. This requires understanding the way both we and those we engage with see the world. The writers describe this as bricolage, because often worldview is pieced together from disparate pieces into a whole that makes sense to the person, whether or not consistent. Some of the pieces include our communities, families, hinge moments in our lives, narrative injuries that may have altered our lives and beliefs, and influencers. The goal of understanding as much of this as possible is perspective-taking, where we try to see the world as the person we are engaging does.
All this lays the groundwork for constructive conversations. How then do we have these conversations? One basic principle Sean McDowell uses is: “Show as much grace and charity as you can without violating your conscience.” He believes one has to approach issues with clarity (what it actually is), charity, and critically. But many conversations approached this way still explode because we aren’t ready emotionally, the physical environment is not right, we are not intellectually prepared, and perhaps most important, there is not relational trust.
Tim Muehlhoff says there are actually three conversations. The pre-conversation focuses on getting our hearts in the right place by discerning our snap judgements, cultivating curiosity about the convictions of the other party, and recognizing the power of the words we choose. In the actual conversation he encourages inviting the other to share their perspective first, summarize their main points where they feel heard and understood, acknowledge where there is common ground and ask for clarification. The post-conversation is how we describe it to our friends–how we speak about people privately will be reflected in how we treat them publicly. One of our challenges of talking about others is we often present strawman versions of their arguments rather than “steelman” versions. They even suggest roleplays of arguing the strongest case of the other side. This, I thought, was one of the most valuable ideas of the work, and something we should be prepared to do if we have been attentive to perspective-taking.
One of the other things the authors do is model engaging over differences in questioning each other about their different views of using preferred pronouns. The discussion itself is illuminating, no matter how you approach this and they both model grace and conviction while differing. Then in the final chapter, they put it all together, offering checklists as one prepare for difficult conversations.
Part of what is winsome in this presentation is that the authors share their own failures and convey that, while we will fail at times, there is real hope for meaningful dialogue across differences, where friendships are forged rather than alienated, where understanding grows alongside respect. With a fraught election season approaching, it is a good time for this book.
____________________
Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.
Our highly polarized cultural atmosphere has led to the breakdown of civil discourse, a rancorous political atmosphere, and sadly, friends and family who no longer talk to each other. It has led to a situation where many do not feel free to share their opinions in their families, workplaces, or in public discussions. It just doesn’t feel safe.
The authors of this book are both engaged in dialogue with those with whom they would disagree, including at times, each other! Sean McDowell, a professor of apologetics, frequently engages in discussions and debates with those who do not agree with his reasons for believing. Tim Muehlhoff is a professor of communication who directs the Winsome Communication Project. Both host podcasts focused on conversations with those who differ on important questions. This book, to which each have contributed chapters focuses on how we may both prepare to engage with those with whom we differ and how we may have those conversations in ways leading at very least to civil disagreement and perhaps growing mutual understanding.
They begin by contrasting a transmission versus ritual view of communication. The transmission view has problems with myside bias that doesn’t reckon with counterarguments and often leaves everyone more entrenched. The ritual view looks for points of commonality where there is an emotional connection, sympathy, with the views of another. This requires understanding the way both we and those we engage with see the world. The writers describe this as bricolage, because often worldview is pieced together from disparate pieces into a whole that makes sense to the person, whether or not consistent. Some of the pieces include our communities, families, hinge moments in our lives, narrative injuries that may have altered our lives and beliefs, and influencers. The goal of understanding as much of this as possible is perspective-taking, where we try to see the world as the person we are engaging does.
All this lays the groundwork for constructive conversations. How then do we have these conversations? One basic principle Sean McDowell uses is: “Show as much grace and charity as you can without violating your conscience.” He believes one has to approach issues with clarity (what it actually is), charity, and critically. But many conversations approached this way still explode because we aren’t ready emotionally, the physical environment is not right, we are not intellectually prepared, and perhaps most important, there is not relational trust.
Tim Muehlhoff says there are actually three conversations. The pre-conversation focuses on getting our hearts in the right place by discerning our snap judgements, cultivating curiosity about the convictions of the other party, and recognizing the power of the words we choose. In the actual conversation he encourages inviting the other to share their perspective first, summarize their main points where they feel heard and understood, acknowledge where there is common ground and ask for clarification. The post-conversation is how we describe it to our friends–how we speak about people privately will be reflected in how we treat them publicly. One of our challenges of talking about others is we often present strawman versions of their arguments rather than “steelman” versions. They even suggest roleplays of arguing the strongest case of the other side. This, I thought, was one of the most valuable ideas of the work, and something we should be prepared to do if we have been attentive to perspective-taking.
One of the other things the authors do is model engaging over differences in questioning each other about their different views of using preferred pronouns. The discussion itself is illuminating, no matter how you approach this and they both model grace and conviction while differing. Then in the final chapter, they put it all together, offering checklists as one prepare for difficult conversations.
Part of what is winsome in this presentation is that the authors share their own failures and convey that, while we will fail at times, there is real hope for meaningful dialogue across differences, where friendships are forged rather than alienated, where understanding grows alongside respect. With a fraught election season approaching, it is a good time for this book.
____________________
Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher for review.
September 20, 2024
Sean McDowell & Tim Muehlhoff’s “End the Stalemate”
Western culture, and the United States is hopelessly divided. A study conducted by the Pew Research Institute determined we are more divided now than in any time in the last century. How did we get here? When you consider the lack of tolerance for viewpoints outside our comfort zone we can long for “the good old days” when we all “got along.”
But consider this; the Pew study referenced above was done in 2014, well before the political arrival of Donald Trump, before the Supreme Court determined bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional and before Roe vs. Wade was overturned. If our dialogue was strained before these “hot button” issues emerged, how much more toxic is our discourse today?
Fortunately, two scholars have provided those who seek meaningful interaction with people of differing perspectives with a helpful guide to develop personal and interpersonal strategies to thoughtfully converse, promoting continued dialogue and understanding. Sean McDowell and Tim Muehlhoff write that we can “End the Stalemate” of toxic dialogue and contempt for those who don’t hold views that align with ours.
The format of the book; short chapters written alternatively by McDowell and Muehlhoff, tackle this contentious topic with compelling data, insightful observation and a healthy dose of humility. As a reader would expect from two professors from the Bible Institute of Los Angeles (BIOLA), the book has robust references to scripture with a clear purpose of ensuring the reader prepares themselves for dialogue with a Christian perspective long before engaging in potentially divisive conversation on cultural, social, religious or political issues.
Muehlhoff speaks of the information overload most of us receive today and how that vast quantity of information can overwhelm our senses and sensibility. We prepare for “dialogue” armed with facts, data and an abundance of talking points from pundits who share our perspective. We are primed to engage, a process made even easier through social media and even through phone calls, which deny us the use of social cues, so necessary to meaningful interpersonal communication. While “transmitting” our perspective we bring our biases and when confronted with opposite “facts” we retreat or resort to name-calling and contempt. Muehlhoff says this response is analogous to our “fight or flight” response we’d experience if we encountered a direct physical threat, such as a mountain lion in our path on a hike.
The book contains meaningful guidance on self-preparation for hard discussions, such as ensuring an appropriate physical space to converse, being able to accept failure after a non-productive conversation, and strategies to encourage continued dialogue and discussion after completing a discussion with someone whom you disagree.
Since both McDowell and Muehlhoff have extensive experience in engaging others with differing perspectives, McDowell through his popular YouTube channel and Muehlhoff through the “Winsome Conviction Project,” they candidly offer their successes and failures in engaging, with encouragement to keep the doors for dialogue open and developing a heart for listening attentively.
“End the Stalemate” is an easy, meaningful read for anyone who earnestly wants to improve the tone and meaning of conversation with family, friends and colleagues. The short chapter format and informal tone make it easy to understand for all readers from early teenagers to adults.
Western culture, and the United States is hopelessly divided. A study conducted by the Pew Research Institute determined we are more divided now than in any time in the last century. How did we get here? When you consider the lack of tolerance for viewpoints outside our comfort zone we can long for “the good old days” when we all “got along.”
But consider this; the Pew study referenced above was done in 2014, well before the political arrival of Donald Trump, before the Supreme Court determined bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional and before Roe vs. Wade was overturned. If our dialogue was strained before these “hot button” issues emerged, how much more toxic is our discourse today?
Fortunately, two scholars have provided those who seek meaningful interaction with people of differing perspectives with a helpful guide to develop personal and interpersonal strategies to thoughtfully converse, promoting continued dialogue and understanding. Sean McDowell and Tim Muehlhoff write that we can “End the Stalemate” of toxic dialogue and contempt for those who don’t hold views that align with ours.
The format of the book; short chapters written alternatively by McDowell and Muehlhoff, tackle this contentious topic with compelling data, insightful observation and a healthy dose of humility. As a reader would expect from two professors from the Bible Institute of Los Angeles (BIOLA), the book has robust references to scripture with a clear purpose of ensuring the reader prepares themselves for dialogue with a Christian perspective long before engaging in potentially divisive conversation on cultural, social, religious or political issues.
Muehlhoff speaks of the information overload most of us receive today and how that vast quantity of information can overwhelm our senses and sensibility. We prepare for “dialogue” armed with facts, data and an abundance of talking points from pundits who share our perspective. We are primed to engage, a process made even easier through social media and even through phone calls, which deny us the use of social cues, so necessary to meaningful interpersonal communication. While “transmitting” our perspective we bring our biases and when confronted with opposite “facts” we retreat or resort to name-calling and contempt. Muehlhoff says this response is analogous to our “fight or flight” response we’d experience if we encountered a direct physical threat, such as a mountain lion in our path on a hike.
The book contains meaningful guidance on self-preparation for hard discussions, such as ensuring an appropriate physical space to converse, being able to accept failure after a non-productive conversation, and strategies to encourage continued dialogue and discussion after completing a discussion with someone whom you disagree.
Since both McDowell and Muehlhoff have extensive experience in engaging others with differing perspectives, McDowell through his popular YouTube channel and Muehlhoff through the “Winsome Conviction Project,” they candidly offer their successes and failures in engaging, with encouragement to keep the doors for dialogue open and developing a heart for listening attentively.
“End the Stalemate” is an easy, meaningful read for anyone who earnestly wants to improve the tone and meaning of conversation with family, friends and colleagues. The short chapter format and informal tone make it easy to understand for all readers from early teenagers to adults.
August 15, 2024
A helpful resource for difficult discussions
We live in an age of outrage and a culture of cancel, which does not facilitate meaningful, charitable discussion. In conversation with those with whom we disagree, we are easily tempted to talk over them and to misrepresent them. We are frequently tempted to express opinion before we have even understood. We should do better, and Sean McDowell and Tim Meulhoff want to help us to do better. In End the Stalemate, they write to help us “move past cancel culture to meaningful conversations.” Christians, in particular, they argue, as God’s ambassadors on earth, must move beyond outrage and cancel culture to engage in meaningful conversation with those with whom they disagree.
The authors argue that charity must be shown to those with whom we disagree in at least three stages.
First, we must properly prepare to charitably engage during pre-conversation. Have we embraced a charitable attitude before we enter the conversation? As we anticipate the discussion, have we adopted an assume-the-best stance toward the person with whom we know we will disagree. Have we tried to put ourselves into their shoes to understand where they are coming from before we even begin the conversation.
Second, we must engage charitably in the conversation. They suggest a four-step approach to this: (1) listen carefully to understand your conversation partner’s perspective; (2) paraphrase their perspective back to them in a way that fairly represents what they believe, asking if you have accurately understood; (3) work hard to find areas of commonality; and (4) ask clarifying questions where necessary. These steps will prepare you to engage well in good-faith discussions, even as you pray for God’s Spirit to help you overcome defensiveness and anger.
Third, we must be careful to speak charitably about our conversation partner in post-conversation. Once the conversation is over and we are back with our in-group, we must be careful not to strawman the conversation. Speak of them and their views in the way that you would want them to speak of you and your views.
Predictably, since the book is written from an American perspective, some of the material is particularly applicable to an American context. Nevertheless, the principles that the authors lean on are rooted in Scripture and therefore transcend culture, even if some of the specific examples are less applicable than others outside of an American context.
Toward the end of the book, each author directs questions at the other to demonstrate their own disagreements with each other and how to charitably discuss and disagree. The authors are transparent with their own failings but encourage their readers that growth is possible The closing chapter offers some helpful diagnostic advice to help ascertain whether conversation will be helpful to begin with.
This is a helpful read for anyone who is serious about communicating with anyone with a different worldview from their own.
We live in an age of outrage and a culture of cancel, which does not facilitate meaningful, charitable discussion. In conversation with those with whom we disagree, we are easily tempted to talk over them and to misrepresent them. We are frequently tempted to express opinion before we have even understood. We should do better, and Sean McDowell and Tim Meulhoff want to help us to do better. In End the Stalemate, they write to help us “move past cancel culture to meaningful conversations.” Christians, in particular, they argue, as God’s ambassadors on earth, must move beyond outrage and cancel culture to engage in meaningful conversation with those with whom they disagree.
The authors argue that charity must be shown to those with whom we disagree in at least three stages.
First, we must properly prepare to charitably engage during pre-conversation. Have we embraced a charitable attitude before we enter the conversation? As we anticipate the discussion, have we adopted an assume-the-best stance toward the person with whom we know we will disagree. Have we tried to put ourselves into their shoes to understand where they are coming from before we even begin the conversation.
Second, we must engage charitably in the conversation. They suggest a four-step approach to this: (1) listen carefully to understand your conversation partner’s perspective; (2) paraphrase their perspective back to them in a way that fairly represents what they believe, asking if you have accurately understood; (3) work hard to find areas of commonality; and (4) ask clarifying questions where necessary. These steps will prepare you to engage well in good-faith discussions, even as you pray for God’s Spirit to help you overcome defensiveness and anger.
Third, we must be careful to speak charitably about our conversation partner in post-conversation. Once the conversation is over and we are back with our in-group, we must be careful not to strawman the conversation. Speak of them and their views in the way that you would want them to speak of you and your views.
Predictably, since the book is written from an American perspective, some of the material is particularly applicable to an American context. Nevertheless, the principles that the authors lean on are rooted in Scripture and therefore transcend culture, even if some of the specific examples are less applicable than others outside of an American context.
Toward the end of the book, each author directs questions at the other to demonstrate their own disagreements with each other and how to charitably discuss and disagree. The authors are transparent with their own failings but encourage their readers that growth is possible The closing chapter offers some helpful diagnostic advice to help ascertain whether conversation will be helpful to begin with.
This is a helpful read for anyone who is serious about communicating with anyone with a different worldview from their own.
September 25, 2024
Summary of End the Stalemate: Move Past Cancel Culture to Meaningful Conversations by Sean McDowell & Tim Muehlhoff
In End the Stalemate, authors Sean McDowell and Tim Muehlhoff tackle the growing topic of cancel culture by providing strategies to navigate difficult conversations. Citing research and observation, they claim that differences of opinion, which often lead to conflict, can conversely enhance dialogue when handled with compassion and insight. Positive interaction starts with understanding how people form their worldviews, which are deeply influenced by their personal relationships and experiences.
The book highlights how individuals are prone to respond to differences with anger due to past trauma or personal hurt and urges the need to approach such scenarios with charity. A central stance is the challenge to bypass the current trend of simply cancelling others instead of facilitating the genuine factors needed to dismantle walls and open doors to better engagement. Rather than focusing on the transmission of information, effective exchanges involve carefully considering another person’s perspective and acknowledging the rituals and moments that create shared bonds and societal unity.
Positing that positive dialogue begins by gaining clarity about how others may interpret life, readers are encouraged to adopt a posture of genuine listening, not just to respond, but to fully grasp opposing viewpoints. By recognising that worldviews are complex mental maps rooted in relationship, healthy communication climates can be nurtured with a respectful attitude that seeks to build trusted bridges.
In suggesting practical steps for undertaking explosive issues, the importance of approaching these discussions with a win-win mindset is proposed. Articulating another’s position with kindness and accuracy is a powerful way to develop mutual appreciation and interpersonal confidence. Yet how can Christians hold true convictions and simultaneously show as much grace and humanity as possible without violating conscience? Setting boundaries and knowing when to take breaks from unnecessary conflicts and any clear or potential impasse can also be keys to foster and sustain civil connections.
Through various techniques and illustrations, McDowell and Muehlhoff proffer that by employing empathy and thoughtfulness, we can dialogue to strengthen relationships, even through disagreement. Their core theme is, “While we may not be able to collectively stop the cultural forces that encourage us to cancel one another, we can each make a difference in our personal lives.” (Page 218–219).
In End the Stalemate, authors Sean McDowell and Tim Muehlhoff tackle the growing topic of cancel culture by providing strategies to navigate difficult conversations. Citing research and observation, they claim that differences of opinion, which often lead to conflict, can conversely enhance dialogue when handled with compassion and insight. Positive interaction starts with understanding how people form their worldviews, which are deeply influenced by their personal relationships and experiences.
The book highlights how individuals are prone to respond to differences with anger due to past trauma or personal hurt and urges the need to approach such scenarios with charity. A central stance is the challenge to bypass the current trend of simply cancelling others instead of facilitating the genuine factors needed to dismantle walls and open doors to better engagement. Rather than focusing on the transmission of information, effective exchanges involve carefully considering another person’s perspective and acknowledging the rituals and moments that create shared bonds and societal unity.
Positing that positive dialogue begins by gaining clarity about how others may interpret life, readers are encouraged to adopt a posture of genuine listening, not just to respond, but to fully grasp opposing viewpoints. By recognising that worldviews are complex mental maps rooted in relationship, healthy communication climates can be nurtured with a respectful attitude that seeks to build trusted bridges.
In suggesting practical steps for undertaking explosive issues, the importance of approaching these discussions with a win-win mindset is proposed. Articulating another’s position with kindness and accuracy is a powerful way to develop mutual appreciation and interpersonal confidence. Yet how can Christians hold true convictions and simultaneously show as much grace and humanity as possible without violating conscience? Setting boundaries and knowing when to take breaks from unnecessary conflicts and any clear or potential impasse can also be keys to foster and sustain civil connections.
Through various techniques and illustrations, McDowell and Muehlhoff proffer that by employing empathy and thoughtfulness, we can dialogue to strengthen relationships, even through disagreement. Their core theme is, “While we may not be able to collectively stop the cultural forces that encourage us to cancel one another, we can each make a difference in our personal lives.” (Page 218–219).
September 27, 2024
End the Stalemate is an insightful dialogue between Sean McDowell and Tim Muehlhoff that discusses the realms of communication and apologetics. It offers a perspective on how Christians can engage with others in meaningful, compassionate conversations. This book serves as a valuable resource for pastors, church leaders, and youth mentors seeking an accessible entry point into understanding how to approach discussions with charity in everyday life.
One of the impactful elements is the personal examples shared by McDowell and Muehlhoff, which make the book feel both practical and relatable. The content strikes a balance—it isn’t a heavy-handed apologetic work filled with overwhelming facts and gotcha questions. Instead, it feels more like a compassionate guide that steers readers through what can often be difficult and emotional conversations.
The book’s structure is particularly helpful, as it addresses how to prepare for a conversation, navigate the conversation itself, and handle the post-conversation reflection. This framework is crucial for anyone looking to engage in respectful dialogue, especially in contexts where differing worldviews might create tension.
The reliance on the wisdom of Proverbs speaks of how McDowell and Muehlhoff would like this book to be used. It emphasises that wisdom and discernment, grounded in the teachings of Scripture, should guide our conversations.
One of the most impactful insights from the book is a quote that has stayed with me: “How we talk about people privately is how we’ll treat them publicly. We are called to not merely tolerate our neighbours but to love them.” This idea displays the heart of the book, to show a spirit of love, humility, and understanding, even in moments of disagreement.
Personally, End the Stalemate has already influenced how I approach conversations, particularly in my interaction with a student from a Buddhist family. The book reminded me to approach with charity and clarity, seeking to understand their background before entering into any kind of evangelism.
One of the impactful elements is the personal examples shared by McDowell and Muehlhoff, which make the book feel both practical and relatable. The content strikes a balance—it isn’t a heavy-handed apologetic work filled with overwhelming facts and gotcha questions. Instead, it feels more like a compassionate guide that steers readers through what can often be difficult and emotional conversations.
The book’s structure is particularly helpful, as it addresses how to prepare for a conversation, navigate the conversation itself, and handle the post-conversation reflection. This framework is crucial for anyone looking to engage in respectful dialogue, especially in contexts where differing worldviews might create tension.
The reliance on the wisdom of Proverbs speaks of how McDowell and Muehlhoff would like this book to be used. It emphasises that wisdom and discernment, grounded in the teachings of Scripture, should guide our conversations.
One of the most impactful insights from the book is a quote that has stayed with me: “How we talk about people privately is how we’ll treat them publicly. We are called to not merely tolerate our neighbours but to love them.” This idea displays the heart of the book, to show a spirit of love, humility, and understanding, even in moments of disagreement.
Personally, End the Stalemate has already influenced how I approach conversations, particularly in my interaction with a student from a Buddhist family. The book reminded me to approach with charity and clarity, seeking to understand their background before entering into any kind of evangelism.
September 27, 2024
In today’s atmosphere of growing polarization, politicization, and cancel culture, End the Stalemate is a much-needed breath of fresh air. McDowell and Muehlhoff are respected voices in Christian communication, and while the communication strategies in this book are based on biblical principles, the practical advice offered in this book applies across all types of communication, not just in the Christian world.
After initially addressing why our society is so divided and unable to communicate respectfully, McDowell and Muehlhoff provide an excellent roadmap to having positive conversations with those who hold opposing views. The authors focus on the importance of listening and building relationships, encouraging readers to try to understand how the other person arrived at a particular viewpoint.
Perhaps the most helpful part of the book is Chapter 7, where Muehlhoff encourages readers to consider the “pre-conversation” (any bias or misperception we have going into the conversation), the actual conversation (a four-step process), and the post-conversation (how we speak about the person and conversation afterward). This practical guide demonstrates how to gently navigate difficult conversations while maintaining integrity and respect for the other person.
The authors challenge readers to be intentional in their conversations and to engage others who hold opposing viewpoints. In today’s climate of hostility, the only path forward is to seek understanding and treat one another with respect. Thus, the authors stress the importance of seeking clarity while showing charity.
If you are tired of today’s argument culture – where honest and productive conversations are rare – and you are looking for a way to positively engage your friends, family, or coworkers who believe differently than you on politics, religions, etc., I would highly recommend this book!
After initially addressing why our society is so divided and unable to communicate respectfully, McDowell and Muehlhoff provide an excellent roadmap to having positive conversations with those who hold opposing views. The authors focus on the importance of listening and building relationships, encouraging readers to try to understand how the other person arrived at a particular viewpoint.
Perhaps the most helpful part of the book is Chapter 7, where Muehlhoff encourages readers to consider the “pre-conversation” (any bias or misperception we have going into the conversation), the actual conversation (a four-step process), and the post-conversation (how we speak about the person and conversation afterward). This practical guide demonstrates how to gently navigate difficult conversations while maintaining integrity and respect for the other person.
The authors challenge readers to be intentional in their conversations and to engage others who hold opposing viewpoints. In today’s climate of hostility, the only path forward is to seek understanding and treat one another with respect. Thus, the authors stress the importance of seeking clarity while showing charity.
If you are tired of today’s argument culture – where honest and productive conversations are rare – and you are looking for a way to positively engage your friends, family, or coworkers who believe differently than you on politics, religions, etc., I would highly recommend this book!
September 28, 2024
We live in a world that is telling us we must pick sides. Democrat or Republican? LGBTQ or Straight? God or Science? These are only a few of the issues we are seeing today, and it seems like much of social media, TV, and News outlets care more about increasing this divide. In the book "End the Stalemate", Sean McDowell and Tim Muehlhoff provide a great conversation outline for readers to follow if they wish to better understand how someone has formed their core beliefs. This book was not written as a tool to convert someone from atheism to Christianity, but rather written as a tool to help on another find common ground in which a respectful relationship can be formed between the two.
After reading this book I believe it to be a valuable resource for Christians and non-Christians who wish to have meaningful conversations with people who hold different beliefs; whether that be to simply understand another person, find common ground with a family member, or maybe you need to repair a damaged relationship with a loved one. These ideas only work if you apply them correctly, and from what I have read parts of this outline will be difficult. But, being someone who has applied some of the authors suggestions in conversations I can tell you they work. It will take work on your end to ensure the conversation stays respectful. But if you are hoping to achieve a new understanding or a type of growth within a relationship, this is one of the better books I have read that provides a way to hopefully achieve that.
We, as people, shouldn't be assisting in furthering this divide between one another. We should embrace the difference of each other, and be able to respectfully engage in conversations where we grow, find common ground, and hopefully achieve unlikely friendships (especially as seen in todays world).
After reading this book I believe it to be a valuable resource for Christians and non-Christians who wish to have meaningful conversations with people who hold different beliefs; whether that be to simply understand another person, find common ground with a family member, or maybe you need to repair a damaged relationship with a loved one. These ideas only work if you apply them correctly, and from what I have read parts of this outline will be difficult. But, being someone who has applied some of the authors suggestions in conversations I can tell you they work. It will take work on your end to ensure the conversation stays respectful. But if you are hoping to achieve a new understanding or a type of growth within a relationship, this is one of the better books I have read that provides a way to hopefully achieve that.
We, as people, shouldn't be assisting in furthering this divide between one another. We should embrace the difference of each other, and be able to respectfully engage in conversations where we grow, find common ground, and hopefully achieve unlikely friendships (especially as seen in todays world).
Read
September 22, 2024 Sean McDowell and Tim Muehlhoff came together to create this book. The back and forth between the authors is done well with each taking an entire chapter and labeling which chapters came from which author.
The main point I took away from the book was regarding perspective taking. I believe this passage is a good representation of the entire book. The idea of perspective taking is something that was new to me. The idea is that we are to try to truly understand the perspective of the person we are communicating with. Only after we understand that perspective can we understand the message they are conveying. If we are to have a meaningful conversation, we must know what they are trying to tell us.
This idea of perspective taking helps me to better practice apologetics because I can try to reach people from a new angle. If I can understand their perspective, I can tailor my message to be more meaningful to the specific person.
Throughout the book, the authors made the case for why we should focus on understanding the other side of a conversation. This passage gives us the tools to accomplish this. It can be awkward when trying to take someone else’s perspective. It doesn’t feel right since we disagree with the eventual message, but it is a useful tool to help figure out where someone is coming from and to bolster our own positions by anticipating skeptical points made by the other side.
The main point I took away from the book was regarding perspective taking. I believe this passage is a good representation of the entire book. The idea of perspective taking is something that was new to me. The idea is that we are to try to truly understand the perspective of the person we are communicating with. Only after we understand that perspective can we understand the message they are conveying. If we are to have a meaningful conversation, we must know what they are trying to tell us.
This idea of perspective taking helps me to better practice apologetics because I can try to reach people from a new angle. If I can understand their perspective, I can tailor my message to be more meaningful to the specific person.
Throughout the book, the authors made the case for why we should focus on understanding the other side of a conversation. This passage gives us the tools to accomplish this. It can be awkward when trying to take someone else’s perspective. It doesn’t feel right since we disagree with the eventual message, but it is a useful tool to help figure out where someone is coming from and to bolster our own positions by anticipating skeptical points made by the other side.
September 23, 2024
If you have a sincere desire to engage in difficult but important conversations on divisive topics in a Christ-like way, this book provides a roadmap to do that. It encourages the reader to embrace "sympathetic awareness," something many Christians struggle to do because we erroneously believe empathetic listening or perspective taking equals affirmation. McDowell and Muehlhoff shows that this approach doesn't equal affirmation but does offer a greater opportunity to engage with others with differing beliefs and worldviews.
Throughout the book the authors show how listening and responding with compassion does not compromise deeply held Christian beliefs but rather helps Christians to understand how a non-believer's background and experiences have shaped their worldview. If you are a Christian who desires to be better prepared to engage in difficult conversations in a biblical way, this is an excellent book to read or listen to. I enjoyed reading it so much, I also purchased the audio version to listen to.
The following quote from co-author Tim Muehlhoff exemplifies what this book is about, "The most important way to approach another person is to understand how that person has pieced together their own unique story and worldview.”
As Christians, if we want to engage with non-believers, or other believers, we need to first try to understand how their "story and worldview" has come to be.
Throughout the book the authors show how listening and responding with compassion does not compromise deeply held Christian beliefs but rather helps Christians to understand how a non-believer's background and experiences have shaped their worldview. If you are a Christian who desires to be better prepared to engage in difficult conversations in a biblical way, this is an excellent book to read or listen to. I enjoyed reading it so much, I also purchased the audio version to listen to.
The following quote from co-author Tim Muehlhoff exemplifies what this book is about, "The most important way to approach another person is to understand how that person has pieced together their own unique story and worldview.”
As Christians, if we want to engage with non-believers, or other believers, we need to first try to understand how their "story and worldview" has come to be.
November 25, 2024
Very practical book on communication theory. I used it for my adult Sunday school class at church. Includes steps to having sensitive conversations with someone. Each week I brought up these four points. Changing communication habits is hard work:
Four Principles:
1) have the other person summarize their view.
2) summarize it back for them (acknowledges what they’ve said).
3) find common ground, even if you disagree with most of what the other person has said. Example: “I also care about the state of the country.”
4) ask clarifying questions: example: “when did you begin to disbelieve?” “What major factor made you change your political affiliation?”
Only criticism: they were neutral on COVID era. The evidence emerging is that the whole pandemic and response was a psyop, totally wrong and tremendously costly (masking, distancing, vaccines,etc.). The truth is: Democide…death by government.
Four Principles:
1) have the other person summarize their view.
2) summarize it back for them (acknowledges what they’ve said).
3) find common ground, even if you disagree with most of what the other person has said. Example: “I also care about the state of the country.”
4) ask clarifying questions: example: “when did you begin to disbelieve?” “What major factor made you change your political affiliation?”
Only criticism: they were neutral on COVID era. The evidence emerging is that the whole pandemic and response was a psyop, totally wrong and tremendously costly (masking, distancing, vaccines,etc.). The truth is: Democide…death by government.
September 27, 2024
Just what I needed...
Let's say you and I don't know each other but decided to meet up for coffee just for fun. We are from a different ethnic background and culture. We sit down and discover that we dress very differently, will vote for the other candidate this fall, and have a different religion. What now? In our polarized world, many would get up and leave. This book teaches us to stay and listen with empathy. It was a refreshing overview of how to speak AND act like Jesus with other worldviews. If we want to engage the world around us with the love and grace of God this book is a must read and was just what I needed.
Let's say you and I don't know each other but decided to meet up for coffee just for fun. We are from a different ethnic background and culture. We sit down and discover that we dress very differently, will vote for the other candidate this fall, and have a different religion. What now? In our polarized world, many would get up and leave. This book teaches us to stay and listen with empathy. It was a refreshing overview of how to speak AND act like Jesus with other worldviews. If we want to engage the world around us with the love and grace of God this book is a must read and was just what I needed.
December 8, 2024
Roadmap to more grace-filled conversations
What a great read! In this time and era, these biblical-backed methods and grace-filled responses give readers a roadmap to use in their lives. As a newer believer in Christ, I felt this strain of how some believers would talk about and discuss specific topics compared to non-believing friends. The majority of the time, there was no difference. Following the Holy Spirit’s guidance and using these methods can provide an opportunity to be different than the world and shine the light of the Lord in conversations.
I look forward to incorporating these into my daily life. Thank you, Sean and Tim!
What a great read! In this time and era, these biblical-backed methods and grace-filled responses give readers a roadmap to use in their lives. As a newer believer in Christ, I felt this strain of how some believers would talk about and discuss specific topics compared to non-believing friends. The majority of the time, there was no difference. Following the Holy Spirit’s guidance and using these methods can provide an opportunity to be different than the world and shine the light of the Lord in conversations.
I look forward to incorporating these into my daily life. Thank you, Sean and Tim!
September 26, 2024
If anyone is tired of cancel culture and wants to understand how to move forward with difficult discussions, this is a great book for you! McDowell and Muehlhoff give practical guidance on how to approach difficult conversations. We have lost the “art” of engaging others and understanding where people are coming from. McDowell and Muehlhoff emphasize connecting with others personally and approaching conversations with empathy and respect. It gives practical advice and relatable examples from their own experiences. In today’s polarizing environment, this is so refreshing!
October 5, 2025
The authors, who are professional communicators, take turns writing chapters as they develop the idea of what collaborative, empathetic communication CAN look like with people we disagree with. They outline not only practical steps for doing so, but the emotional work that is also necessary before having hard/potentially contentious conversations.
They end the book by asking each other thoughtful questions on topics they, themselves, disagree, showing a model for this type of engagement.
Very enjoyable and helpful. Dare I say, a should-read for anyone!
They end the book by asking each other thoughtful questions on topics they, themselves, disagree, showing a model for this type of engagement.
Very enjoyable and helpful. Dare I say, a should-read for anyone!
October 2, 2024
Got better as it went along. Started with a lot of communication basics and things that probably won't feel new to a lot of people (maybe not younger people). But there was more application, depth, and nuance in the back half of the book. There are other books that have done similar things, but there are some unique contributions from communication theory and focus on conversation processes and postures which was helpful.
December 31, 2024
Incredible read that I sincerely wish “commentary influencers “ would read and apply (glances at 90% of Pierce Morgan’s guests).
I consumed this in audio form but do plan on reading a physical copy to pull out the notes and points for me to reflect on and apply. I feel that I learned a lot just from listening (an actual point in the book) but I’m a girl who needs the visuals for her lists and to add to a commonplace book.
I consumed this in audio form but do plan on reading a physical copy to pull out the notes and points for me to reflect on and apply. I feel that I learned a lot just from listening (an actual point in the book) but I’m a girl who needs the visuals for her lists and to add to a commonplace book.
September 27, 2024
This book was very practical and easy to read. I loved the questions it had me ask myself. It encouraged me to take on the perspective of others and provided steps on how to do this. This book is a great resource for having conversations in general, but especially with people who have different beliefs.
Read
October 2, 2025unrated. would be better without repeating the incredibly weak and frankly baffling argument against using peoples stated pronouns — and the associated recommendations to ask someone for a whole essay or meeting to even consider them is such an obvious nonstarter I question why this example was even mentioned
May 27, 2025
Very Practical
A very practical guide to navigate conversations with people. A focus on giving the reason for the hope that’s within you but doing it with gentleness, respect, and grace.
A very practical guide to navigate conversations with people. A focus on giving the reason for the hope that’s within you but doing it with gentleness, respect, and grace.
October 18, 2024
Very timely, relevant, and helpful.
February 9, 2025
Sean and Tim teach and model a refreshing way of engaging with people about sensitive issues and disagreements with grace, clarity and humility.
February 28, 2025
Great book with practical steps on how to disagree agreeably, which can be an effective strategy not only while sharing your faith, but also in any disagreement.
April 26, 2025
A very needed work, to be read by all in our times, at least I think so.
May 20, 2025
Very informative
October 28, 2024
Sean and Tim have an intriguing way of engaging those who have differing views than the Christian. They start off the book by what adds fuel to the fire of cancel culture and then work their way throughout the book in how a Christian should see others who do not align with them. The authors methodically guide the reader from trying to clearly understand someone’s positions on certain beliefs - especially the explosive issues - to continuing with charity in the conversation and being critical when necessary. I really enjoyed reading this book, but it challenged me not to be so quick to jump to conclusions about a person with differing views. It also challenged me on how I converse with others and to get out of my set ways of thinking in order to bridge the gap by hearing different beliefs and understanding the person. Honestly, this book is great for anyone, Christian or not in how to approach hard topics without sacrificing a potential relationship.
December 31, 2025
Good read for everyone! We need to have healthy dialogue to better understand each other!
Displaying 1 - 29 of 29 reviews