Cards on the table, I know these guys to three varying degrees. Derek Beres and I have had a few Facebook Messenger exchanges but outside of those, I have never met nor spoken with him. I met Julian Walker several months after the release of 21st Century Yoga: Culture, Politics, and Practice which contained essays from both of us. His chapter in that book revealed to me a kindred spirit in its emphases on critiquing the dualism in Patanjali that places Classical Yoga in compete dissonance with contemporary body and sex positivity. His valuation of Western intellectual history and values was also refreshing as Western Enlightenment values are often ignored or rejected by so many in the new-age/yoga industrial complex. The one time we met was a lovely evening meal somewhere in Los Angeles squeezed into our busy schedules while I was in town lecturing on Buddhist philosophy and the conversation was lively. Matthew Remski also had an essay in 21st Century Yoga and for the life of me I cannot remember if we had met before that or not, but certainly since 2012 we have tilted back more than a few pints when I was visiting Toronto and we’ve shared time when our teaching schedule overlapped in Costa Rica and Montreal, and a year or two before Covid I hosted Matthew when he offered a series of talks at Tucson Yoga, but it's been some years since we've had any contact. All this said, I think I’m unbiased in saying this is a good book, an important book, and one that I would wish those who need it most would take the time to read and ponder. Cards still on the table, I may be too much of a curmudgeon skeptic to hope for that ever happening.
For those totally in the dark as to this phenomenon referred to as “conspirituality” the authors offer the following definition in Chapter One, “Charlotte’s Web” based upon the paper containing the first modern-day definition, “The Emergence of Conspirituality” referring to it as “a synthesis of the ‘female-dominated New Age (with its positive focus on self) and the male-dominated realm of conspiracy theory (with its negative focus on global politics.”’ They then go to quote more fully from that defining paper:
offers a broad politico-spiritual philosophy based on two core convictions, the first traditional to conspiracy theory, the second rooted in the New Age:
1. a secret group covertly controls, or is trying to control, the political and social order, and
2. humanity is undergoing a ‘paradigm shift’ in consciousness.
Their book goes on to show how so many generally progressive members of the new age wellness yoga complex have ended up allies with, and sometimes completely merged into, the QAnon cult to the absurd point that they could come to think a morally corrupt narcissist like Donald Trump is a “lightworker” guiding the planet into a “great awakening.” Importantly, they also show how this isn’t a contemporary aberration given modern yoga’s fascination with body fascism and eugenics. If you're a yoga practitioner unaware of this history brace yourself before diving into this book!
The book is presented in four parts, with Part One: Conspirituality 101 laying out the three theoretical motifs laid out by political scientist, Michael Barkun, that are shared by those who consider themselves “spiritual” and those prone to conspiracy theorizing and how these three motifs shape their shared paranoid vision: Nothing happens by accident. Nothing is as it seems. Everything is connected.
Each author presents their own background stories: Derek’s experience with the hyperbole and disinformation promulgated by the wellness industry; Julian’s with the cult around Ana Forest’s trauma theory; and Matthew’s with the cults of the nefarious Michael Roach and then with the Endeavor Academy founded on the bullshit bible of “manifestation” known as A Course In Miracles. Some of the internal contradictions embedded in conspiritual thinking are also presented.
Part Two: Strange Attractors focuses on the historical tensions and perennial themes that arise again and again to distort ancient wisdom teachings and undermine clear thinking in the wellness and yoga worlds. For those who have swallowed yoga propaganda it may provoke some dissonance and chagrin to learn that Nazis and eugenicists were right there at the genesis of contemporary yoga and wellness ideology. Reading about this and how the current nationalist government utilizes yoga for its own nefarious reasons for the first time might provoke some to re-think the idolization of yoga, the presumption that it is synonymous with Hinduism, and participating in International Yoga Day. While I’ve long known about the bullshit racism promulgated by Rudolf Steiner, I can’t help but think of those parents unknowingly thinking Waldorf Schools are so progressive. Here they unpack the notion of the body’s “impurity” behind the cleansing ideology that makes big bucks for the charlatans selling their various cleanses. But it's important here too to point out so-called indigenous medicine traditions from China and India are the seedbed for such ideas. Much of the rest of this part exposes the pseudoscience behind S.C.A.M. or so-called “alternative medicine”.
Part Three: Gallery of Rogues offers a chapter each on the following “influencers” who “fetishize science, philosophy, and community, and make a mess of all three.” These include asshats who reject germ theory, for instance, and promulgate a mess of quantum woo that would make Niels Bohr turn over in his grave. These rogues? Kelly Brogan and Sayer Ji (two I thankfully had never heard of before following the podcast that spawned this book but sound absolutely despicable); Charles Eisenstein (whose name comes up in FB posts from some I number as friends) who pontificates on nutrition, economics, anthropology, and environmental science with his BA in math and philosophy and has even been hosted by Oprah Winfrey. As an aside, that woman is responsible for promoting more bullshit than just about any celebrity I can think of, giving credence to a shit load of stink over the years.
Then there’s Christiane Northrup who went full-on QAnon during the pandemic she denied actually existed. (Yet again we can “thank” Winfrey for making her a well-known household name among those in the wellness/yoga world.) The other rogues include Mikki Willis, purveyor of junk pseudoscience via film; J. P. Sears who once did some funny videos making fun of new-age/yoga people as well as conspiracy mongers before getting red-pilled by big anti-science conspiracy theories and becoming what seems to be a rabid bigot supporting Trump’s “big lie” and calling the Jan 6th riot “a false flag” Antifa setup; Dr. Zach Bush who pontificated about Covid while never actually working on the front lines (hail, by the way, to those doctors and nurses who bore the brunt of that work); Robert Kennedy Jr, the less said about this arse the better; Katie Griggs who, under the alias of Guru Jagat created a cult (a meta-cult?) based upon the cult of rapist Yogi Bhagan’s pseudo-Kundalini Yoga; supposed channelers and “lightworkers” (is there a more ironic name possible for these dark-agers?) and Joe Dispenza, a freaking chiropractor who likes to pass himself off as a neuroscientist! It should be enough for any clear-headed, rational-minded individual to know what we can make of someone who was affiliated with the (oh my god I have to laugh) “Ramtha’s School of Enlightenment” headed by the antisemitic, racist JZ Knight who believes (or more accurately performs) that she’s a channeler for a 35,000 year old guy with a bad somewhat Scottish sounding accent named Ramtha.
Reading about these people, I remain flummoxed at how so many are bulldozed into swallowing this bullshit and following these asses, charlatans, and deluded people. And then I’m reminded that Julian and Matthew, two guys much smarter and more educated than me fell for the charlatans leading three cults among the two of them. So, if anything, a work such as this (and the on-going work they do in their Conspirituality Podcase) can help break down the notion that only fools are fooled by these quacks. And that is something those who do not fall for this shit need to understand, because among the skeptic community, there are many who assume that falling for this shit is a sign of low intelligence. It's not that. But why they fall for this shite still remains somewhat of a mystery to me.
The concluding Part Four: Beyond Conspiritualality overall seems to want to leave us with – if not a happy ending – with some hope and good vibes. I’m not sure how successful the writers are with that. There are chapters about people who managed to break free of cults and communities of new-age disinformation. In the last chapter, “What We’ve Been Given” the lads admit “This is definitely not a self-help book, and we’re a long way out from the days in which, as yoga and wellness gig workers, we presumed to give advice.” They add that they are also “painfully aware that conspirituality has strong roots in the cringey instinct to tell people what to think from a morally superior position.” That acknowledged, they try to find some silver lining in the fog of disinformation. “Spirituality – at any level of integrity – speaks to deep human needs for meaning, purpose, and community.” And it is just that exactly that I criticized in my essay, “Religious But Not Spiritual.” As Nick Cave points out, “spirituality” or what passes for it, tends to be shallow and self-satisfyingly placating. These charlatans earn their position because none of them are actually challenging what people want to believe. “Meaning, purpose, and community” and the need for them is not anything other than human. Why the impulse to make something spiritual out of the best impulses of humanity? Why the need to feel special by identifying oneself as “spiritual” in the first place?
The authors do constructively point out that “ungrounded spirituality can engender a fetish for transcendence that devalues everyday life and worldly concerns.” Thinking we are “spiritual beings having a human experience” already distances oneself from nature, from reality. Interpreting ecstatic experiences as anything more than natural phenomena ( as in “shakti”, “chi”, “meridians”, “chakras”, “auras”, etc) opens people up to being highly suggestible and thus amenable to anti-scientific s.c.a.m. (so called alternative medicine) and outlandish global conspiracies.
In conclusion, they write: “It does seem inevitable that if what we call ‘spirituality’ continues to be colonized by an absence of critical thinking and the politics of bodily purity, spiritual tourism, and the self project – toxic dynamics will result.” Given that humans be human, I don’t think we can expect such colonization to simply stop. What does that leave for those of us with respect for evidentiary, empirical, falsifiable truths and who prize critical thinking and scientific skepticism? To answer this question, I recall a professor I had years ago who said that skeptical, critical inquiry itself is a creative and potentially spiritual endeavor. These guys are doing just that.
I’m still not sure if their message will land on any ears other than those of us already critical and skeptical, but hey, perhaps…..?