What do you think?
Rate this book
Fisman's Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science
When Pseudoscience, Politics & Fraud ConvergeWhat lengths will ideologically or financially-driven researchers and politicians go to impose their will upon others?
Throughout the pandemic we've witnessed a slide from objective clinical research to easily manipulated "real-world" studies to purely fictional simulations completely detached from reality. "Consensus" (aka groupthink) quickly replaced scientific scrutiny and civil discourse plummeted. It became difficult to discern scientific recommendations from political talking points.
On April 25, 2022 a very dangerous line was crossed. Leaders in the Canadian research and medical community rubber-stamped a clearly fraudulent study. Its overarching to use "science" to justify discrimination, sow hatred and reinterpret the notion of inalienable rights.
Within hours of the study's official publication, dozens of articles in top national papers flooded Canada warning of the dire risk of merely hanging out with unvaccinated people — selfish souls who refused to accept the new genetic COVID-19 vaccines. The "unvaccinated" were compared to carriers of syphilis, intoxicated drivers and reckless individuals who had no regard for others.
Can't get an operation? Blame the unvaccinated! The "science" says so.
But did it? This book
• The man, the politics and the intent behind the faux study.
• How researchers concocted results to overwrite reality & scapegoat the unvaccinated.
• The Establishment's willingness to go along with the fraud.
• How political ideology fed into the analysis.
• How the research is being used to swindle Canadians out of their Charter rights & freedoms.An Investigative Look Into Fisman's Precedent-Setting Hate Science
“FISMAN’S FRAUD is both a disturbing and an exhilarating read. The book exposes what is effectively a crime scene with various agents complicit in producing fraudulent science that was used by media and the Prime Minister to fuel hatred and societal division. Watteel reveals in precise detail how every system of oversight and accountability, from the University of Toronto to the Ontario Provincial Police failed in their duty to act with integrity. The exhilarating aspect is that the book shines a bright light on those responsible. Watteel names names and calls them out for what they are - morally bankrupt. Fisman’s Fraud gives hope that by exposing the fraud justice may prevail and civility restored to this Nation.” — Ted Kuntz, President Vaccine Choice Canada
“FISMAN’S FRAUD is a must read that slices through the layers of lost integrity, accountability and responsibility to reveal the greatest deception of our time. Easy to read but hard to swallow, the facts speak volumes in implicating those in power who intentionally failed to keep the ship off the rocks. Although the content is specific to Ontario, the implications were deadly, far-reaching and the situation warrants further investigation. Those responsible are currently still at the helm and the ship is in dangerous waters.” — Vincent A Gircys, Veteran Police Constable, Ontario Provincial Police - Forensic Collision Reconstructionist
Throughout the pandemic we've witnessed a slide from objective clinical research to easily manipulated "real-world" studies to purely fictional simulations completely detached from reality. "Consensus" (aka groupthink) quickly replaced scientific scrutiny and civil discourse plummeted. It became difficult to discern scientific recommendations from political talking points.
On April 25, 2022 a very dangerous line was crossed. Leaders in the Canadian research and medical community rubber-stamped a clearly fraudulent study. Its overarching to use "science" to justify discrimination, sow hatred and reinterpret the notion of inalienable rights.
Within hours of the study's official publication, dozens of articles in top national papers flooded Canada warning of the dire risk of merely hanging out with unvaccinated people — selfish souls who refused to accept the new genetic COVID-19 vaccines. The "unvaccinated" were compared to carriers of syphilis, intoxicated drivers and reckless individuals who had no regard for others.
Can't get an operation? Blame the unvaccinated! The "science" says so.
But did it? This book
• The man, the politics and the intent behind the faux study.
• How researchers concocted results to overwrite reality & scapegoat the unvaccinated.
• The Establishment's willingness to go along with the fraud.
• How political ideology fed into the analysis.
• How the research is being used to swindle Canadians out of their Charter rights & freedoms.An Investigative Look Into Fisman's Precedent-Setting Hate Science
“FISMAN’S FRAUD is both a disturbing and an exhilarating read. The book exposes what is effectively a crime scene with various agents complicit in producing fraudulent science that was used by media and the Prime Minister to fuel hatred and societal division. Watteel reveals in precise detail how every system of oversight and accountability, from the University of Toronto to the Ontario Provincial Police failed in their duty to act with integrity. The exhilarating aspect is that the book shines a bright light on those responsible. Watteel names names and calls them out for what they are - morally bankrupt. Fisman’s Fraud gives hope that by exposing the fraud justice may prevail and civility restored to this Nation.” — Ted Kuntz, President Vaccine Choice Canada
“FISMAN’S FRAUD is a must read that slices through the layers of lost integrity, accountability and responsibility to reveal the greatest deception of our time. Easy to read but hard to swallow, the facts speak volumes in implicating those in power who intentionally failed to keep the ship off the rocks. Although the content is specific to Ontario, the implications were deadly, far-reaching and the situation warrants further investigation. Those responsible are currently still at the helm and the ship is in dangerous waters.” — Vincent A Gircys, Veteran Police Constable, Ontario Provincial Police - Forensic Collision Reconstructionist
244 pages, Paperback
Published November 7, 2023
11 people are currently reading
72 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
April 25, 2024
I am sick in my soul with a greater understanding of the historic destruction of a once great country.
The vax fraud was horrible, but the government, media, and academic elite involvement was evil incarnate. There is no happy ending to this story, so it is time to “bug out” before they convince you that you are happy under the thumb of you friendly medical, legal, educational institutions.
My future readings will no longer examine the most locked down country in the world; but I challenge everyone seeking situational awareness to look at how low our prime minister is willing to go for absolute power over you.
The vax fraud was horrible, but the government, media, and academic elite involvement was evil incarnate. There is no happy ending to this story, so it is time to “bug out” before they convince you that you are happy under the thumb of you friendly medical, legal, educational institutions.
My future readings will no longer examine the most locked down country in the world; but I challenge everyone seeking situational awareness to look at how low our prime minister is willing to go for absolute power over you.
July 9, 2024
This book was so good that I might have to buckle and purchase it. Was not aware of the Fismans paper prior to this. The whole fake pandemic crap just makes a person sick to their stomached, especially given that it all comes down to money and profits! People should never be viewed as being disposable!
January 15, 2025
Excellent book.
The best book about covid in Canada I have read so far.
Dr. Watteel does a great job going through in excruciating detail the fraud perpetrated by Fisman et al., the university system, public health and government/police.
The final chapters excellently tie the whole fraud together and brilliantly describe the incentives and lies of covid policies.
On her legal analysis it was well done and well researched.
The courts truly have failed canadians.
My criticism arises from outside of her expertise, "what is to be done?"
If the apple is rotten to the core with only a few good parts/actors do we toss the apple or salvage it?
On section 1 reverse onus I completely agree that policies were neither narrow or justified.
But how can we remedy this situation?
Will new CPC have strength to do what must be done?
If courts, judges, unions, police, universities, health experts etc... can go on as business as usual perhaps the system needs drastic change.
Fire or judicial review all judges.
Move Oakes test to higher burn standard.
Fire and jail public health.
Defund U of T. (And must universities)
Move policing to municipality funded by set tax payer money and elected police chief. Allow citizens to self defend and own fire arms for protection to prevent police tyranny.
These above policies may help but perhaps the largest issue is Canadians themselves.
To passive and susceptible to propaganda.
The best book about covid in Canada I have read so far.
Dr. Watteel does a great job going through in excruciating detail the fraud perpetrated by Fisman et al., the university system, public health and government/police.
The final chapters excellently tie the whole fraud together and brilliantly describe the incentives and lies of covid policies.
On her legal analysis it was well done and well researched.
The courts truly have failed canadians.
My criticism arises from outside of her expertise, "what is to be done?"
If the apple is rotten to the core with only a few good parts/actors do we toss the apple or salvage it?
On section 1 reverse onus I completely agree that policies were neither narrow or justified.
But how can we remedy this situation?
Will new CPC have strength to do what must be done?
If courts, judges, unions, police, universities, health experts etc... can go on as business as usual perhaps the system needs drastic change.
Fire or judicial review all judges.
Move Oakes test to higher burn standard.
Fire and jail public health.
Defund U of T. (And must universities)
Move policing to municipality funded by set tax payer money and elected police chief. Allow citizens to self defend and own fire arms for protection to prevent police tyranny.
These above policies may help but perhaps the largest issue is Canadians themselves.
To passive and susceptible to propaganda.
Currently reading
October 14, 2024---- 10/10/24 Start
I am currently reading this and I just found the origins of the first mandate (1998 in Ontario), which were not convincing. (It was asking healthcare workers about policy instead of the basis for the mandate, which was later applied more broadly for H1N1 in 2005/2006.) However, the study brought up also happened to be done by University of Toronto as well. (It is citation 41 on the CMAJ websitehttps://www.cmaj.ca/content/186/14/10...) Hmmm. So, the origin of the mandate has a policy origin, rather than a health origin. It also appears that nurses were afraid to give medical reasons for not getting the injection and instead felt that implied health outcomes and staff reasons were safe. So, despite uptake for Flu vaccination was 50% among healthcare workers according the CMAJ website, the healthcare workers in the article could not cite the Health Care counter point to getting a vaccination. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14649...
---- 10/10/24 End
---- 10/13/24 Start ---Precision Modifications to Come
Now, it isn't clear that these are precise time frames. It seems to apply inconsistently for example AHS in 2015 was 'humming and hawing' about applying a mandate for Flu in 2015. [https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...] However, is this stoking the fires of an ideology? Maybe it is genuine? But, if they are thinking about it, why is the standard implicitly in question? Why is the alternative to vaccination not brought up? (antibody titer measurements for Flu) It gets stranger when in BC in 2012 they were saying Firefighters must be vaccinated or have to wear a Star of David on their shoulder, or a mask on their face. I did a tour of the fire department in elementary school and, their number one priority is 'As few steps as possible, to get there as soon as possible.' This 'star of david' on the face is an extra step. Flu season normally starts in the north hemisphere when exposure to the sun (Vit D levels) goes down. [https://hsabc.org/news/firefighters-w...]
Now I do not know if there is any bearing on this topic, but I found a paper in 2012 advocating Canadian institutions to "get vaccinated". [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...]
So far --
Minister of Health Position Created 1996
Mandate Start in Ontario 1998 (manufactured stress?)
Mandate spreads to Acute care 2000 (Manufactured stress?)
Mandate spreads more widely in hospitals, medical schools and nuring homes 2005/2006 during H1N1 ("Crisis" time)
Mandate for Flu may have started with firefighters in 2012? (Manufactured stress?)
Mandate for Flu in question 2015 without alternative? (Manufactured stress?)
Mandate for Flu maintained, expanded to Covid instituted in Sept 2021 now covering the police. ("Crisis" time)
Mandate provokes Truckers to campaign prior to arriving in Ottawa Jan 2022 (Crisis response?)
Trudeau invokes the Emergency Act Feb 14, 2022 (Extreme legislation justified?)
Mandate for Covid Provincial employees Ends 28 Mar 2022 (Partial de-escalation)
Mandate for Covid Federal employees Ends 20 June 2022 (Partial De-escelation)
Healthcare workers still have Covid and Flu mandate with no alternatives, despite alternatives being possible.
23 Jan 2024 Court Ruled Emergency Act "Unconstitutional"
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/tr...
"2022 illegal demonstrations and blockades was unreasonable" While this is correct, it was the exact point of the protest because in advance of the protest the truckers had a kind of business arrangement with the the tow trucks, creating slight difficulties with law enforcement. This was a triangulation to counter the triangulation created by the mandates. However, the truckers annouced in advance of arrival and constantly tried to speak to parliament members to get the attention of Justin Trudeau, who called them names and ran away.
In the grand scheme of things two wrongs don't make a right is what "2022 illegal demonstrations and blockades was unreasonable" means.
Released: Aug 30, 2024 -- Health Canada governed by Mark Holland creates "The Public Health Agency of Canada's Behavioral Science Office" (Explaining what happened Apr 2021 -Mar 2023)
Pg 10 of this document shows a growth plan; "2021/2 Developing, 2022/2023 Emerging, 2023/2025 Achieving, 2025+ Optimizing". Sounds an awful lot like creating the Minister of Health in 1998, but again in 2024.
https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/pha...
If somehow an ideology has been created that demonizes the unvaccinated and is associated with a political power grab, how do we know it is gone unless unvaccinated healthcare workers are allowed to return to work in the field where they were uniquely qualified? If they should just get vaccinated, why don't we just expand the the reasoning of the Behavioral Science Office to other institutions like the Police, Firefighters, Court, Stock Market, Steel Workers. Where does it end? Did it end with Mar of 2023? Is there an infection of business and politics in Healthcare? Is it a business boom in Healthcare which happens to be associated with business and politics? How do we tell the difference between business boom and infection of business?
Is it as simple as medical choice? Maybe it is responsibility for institutions to provide PPI instead of a 3rd party who profits? The institution provides masks, what is wrong with providing an injection to protect the employee?
-------------------
In 2000 EMS are threatened with dismissal for refusing Flu shot. Ontario Paramedics challenges mandate.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
This description of a perspective of a nurse trying to save her job during a mandate rollout provides a great framework to fit those weird vaccination plugs. For example the one in 2015 where AHS is not sure about the mandate, but was sure not to mention alternatives. Now that I think about it. This allows people who still have anxiety about being given this framework, just so they can keep their job, something to complain about. https://www.nnpbc.com/mandatory-influ... That point on Utilitarianism was something that Anthony Fauci virtue signaled when he was in the movie that Disney made of him. It is in he first 15 minutes. Anyways, this policy charge story is exactly the contradiction I am pointing to. Notice how when she talks about measuring antibodies, it isn't from personal verification, but papers. How many nurses read papers every week? Maybe a few a year, or when you upgrade with courses. In other words her antibody points are a kind-of "trust me bro" talking point to colleagues. Nurses not being able to participate in informing themselves on how their body reacts to a vaccine, or an infection is a kind of de-skilling. It is like putting an eyepatch on the nurse creating a blind spot. Physically, the nurses who have never experienced this antibody testing genuinely have no idea. I spoke to a nurse who started in Halifax when it all started and she was just learning about antibody testing for Covid antibodies. She was just offering me the nose scraper to test for Covid, because that is how she was taught. To protect her identity, I cannot upload the recording. But, she was recorded for her protection from the administration of her hospital and the lab who might be upset she asked for something they refused to provide. Where does the lab benefit from not administering a test. Are they getting kick backs somewhere else? Maybe, more favorable contracts? Covid and Flu are the most common sicknesses now. You would think those would be the most common blood Titer Tests. If only I had continued to be a lab tech, maybe I would know. Back to the point of the article. I find it interesting that Utilitarianism is introduced at the same time as demonizing antivax (a propaganda term). That was the exact term that was used during covid. However, it seems in this context, it is being used to soften the cold "values" of 'the greater good' in utilitarianism. This is why I dislike this term. It is media-speak and word that should not be used either way because even saying it as an other creates another othered group. 'Those who won't listen to the options we offer'.
---- 10/13/24 End ---Precision Modifications to Come
I am currently reading this and I just found the origins of the first mandate (1998 in Ontario), which were not convincing. (It was asking healthcare workers about policy instead of the basis for the mandate, which was later applied more broadly for H1N1 in 2005/2006.) However, the study brought up also happened to be done by University of Toronto as well. (It is citation 41 on the CMAJ websitehttps://www.cmaj.ca/content/186/14/10...) Hmmm. So, the origin of the mandate has a policy origin, rather than a health origin. It also appears that nurses were afraid to give medical reasons for not getting the injection and instead felt that implied health outcomes and staff reasons were safe. So, despite uptake for Flu vaccination was 50% among healthcare workers according the CMAJ website, the healthcare workers in the article could not cite the Health Care counter point to getting a vaccination. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14649...
---- 10/10/24 End
---- 10/13/24 Start ---Precision Modifications to Come
Now, it isn't clear that these are precise time frames. It seems to apply inconsistently for example AHS in 2015 was 'humming and hawing' about applying a mandate for Flu in 2015. [https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...] However, is this stoking the fires of an ideology? Maybe it is genuine? But, if they are thinking about it, why is the standard implicitly in question? Why is the alternative to vaccination not brought up? (antibody titer measurements for Flu) It gets stranger when in BC in 2012 they were saying Firefighters must be vaccinated or have to wear a Star of David on their shoulder, or a mask on their face. I did a tour of the fire department in elementary school and, their number one priority is 'As few steps as possible, to get there as soon as possible.' This 'star of david' on the face is an extra step. Flu season normally starts in the north hemisphere when exposure to the sun (Vit D levels) goes down. [https://hsabc.org/news/firefighters-w...]
Now I do not know if there is any bearing on this topic, but I found a paper in 2012 advocating Canadian institutions to "get vaccinated". [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...]
So far --
Minister of Health Position Created 1996
Mandate Start in Ontario 1998 (manufactured stress?)
Mandate spreads to Acute care 2000 (Manufactured stress?)
Mandate spreads more widely in hospitals, medical schools and nuring homes 2005/2006 during H1N1 ("Crisis" time)
Mandate for Flu may have started with firefighters in 2012? (Manufactured stress?)
Mandate for Flu in question 2015 without alternative? (Manufactured stress?)
Mandate for Flu maintained, expanded to Covid instituted in Sept 2021 now covering the police. ("Crisis" time)
Mandate provokes Truckers to campaign prior to arriving in Ottawa Jan 2022 (Crisis response?)
Trudeau invokes the Emergency Act Feb 14, 2022 (Extreme legislation justified?)
Mandate for Covid Provincial employees Ends 28 Mar 2022 (Partial de-escalation)
Mandate for Covid Federal employees Ends 20 June 2022 (Partial De-escelation)
Healthcare workers still have Covid and Flu mandate with no alternatives, despite alternatives being possible.
23 Jan 2024 Court Ruled Emergency Act "Unconstitutional"
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/tr...
"2022 illegal demonstrations and blockades was unreasonable" While this is correct, it was the exact point of the protest because in advance of the protest the truckers had a kind of business arrangement with the the tow trucks, creating slight difficulties with law enforcement. This was a triangulation to counter the triangulation created by the mandates. However, the truckers annouced in advance of arrival and constantly tried to speak to parliament members to get the attention of Justin Trudeau, who called them names and ran away.
In the grand scheme of things two wrongs don't make a right is what "2022 illegal demonstrations and blockades was unreasonable" means.
Released: Aug 30, 2024 -- Health Canada governed by Mark Holland creates "The Public Health Agency of Canada's Behavioral Science Office" (Explaining what happened Apr 2021 -Mar 2023)
Pg 10 of this document shows a growth plan; "2021/2 Developing, 2022/2023 Emerging, 2023/2025 Achieving, 2025+ Optimizing". Sounds an awful lot like creating the Minister of Health in 1998, but again in 2024.
https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/pha...
If somehow an ideology has been created that demonizes the unvaccinated and is associated with a political power grab, how do we know it is gone unless unvaccinated healthcare workers are allowed to return to work in the field where they were uniquely qualified? If they should just get vaccinated, why don't we just expand the the reasoning of the Behavioral Science Office to other institutions like the Police, Firefighters, Court, Stock Market, Steel Workers. Where does it end? Did it end with Mar of 2023? Is there an infection of business and politics in Healthcare? Is it a business boom in Healthcare which happens to be associated with business and politics? How do we tell the difference between business boom and infection of business?
Is it as simple as medical choice? Maybe it is responsibility for institutions to provide PPI instead of a 3rd party who profits? The institution provides masks, what is wrong with providing an injection to protect the employee?
-------------------
In 2000 EMS are threatened with dismissal for refusing Flu shot. Ontario Paramedics challenges mandate.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
This description of a perspective of a nurse trying to save her job during a mandate rollout provides a great framework to fit those weird vaccination plugs. For example the one in 2015 where AHS is not sure about the mandate, but was sure not to mention alternatives. Now that I think about it. This allows people who still have anxiety about being given this framework, just so they can keep their job, something to complain about. https://www.nnpbc.com/mandatory-influ... That point on Utilitarianism was something that Anthony Fauci virtue signaled when he was in the movie that Disney made of him. It is in he first 15 minutes. Anyways, this policy charge story is exactly the contradiction I am pointing to. Notice how when she talks about measuring antibodies, it isn't from personal verification, but papers. How many nurses read papers every week? Maybe a few a year, or when you upgrade with courses. In other words her antibody points are a kind-of "trust me bro" talking point to colleagues. Nurses not being able to participate in informing themselves on how their body reacts to a vaccine, or an infection is a kind of de-skilling. It is like putting an eyepatch on the nurse creating a blind spot. Physically, the nurses who have never experienced this antibody testing genuinely have no idea. I spoke to a nurse who started in Halifax when it all started and she was just learning about antibody testing for Covid antibodies. She was just offering me the nose scraper to test for Covid, because that is how she was taught. To protect her identity, I cannot upload the recording. But, she was recorded for her protection from the administration of her hospital and the lab who might be upset she asked for something they refused to provide. Where does the lab benefit from not administering a test. Are they getting kick backs somewhere else? Maybe, more favorable contracts? Covid and Flu are the most common sicknesses now. You would think those would be the most common blood Titer Tests. If only I had continued to be a lab tech, maybe I would know. Back to the point of the article. I find it interesting that Utilitarianism is introduced at the same time as demonizing antivax (a propaganda term). That was the exact term that was used during covid. However, it seems in this context, it is being used to soften the cold "values" of 'the greater good' in utilitarianism. This is why I dislike this term. It is media-speak and word that should not be used either way because even saying it as an other creates another othered group. 'Those who won't listen to the options we offer'.
---- 10/13/24 End ---Precision Modifications to Come
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
January 27, 2024
This woman is a dog with a bone! She took to write this book because the Canadian government was using a fabricated mathematical model instead of readily-available population data to justify vaccine mandates and passports. The Fisman study was authored by scientists, a university and a journal that had monetary connections to the pharmaceutical industry. Rather than use the readily-available data to show that the unvaccinated posed no risk to the vaccinated and that in fact the vaccinated were contracting Covid at a higher rate, they fabricated models to support a political conclusion. She calls this "hate science." Even though the study has not aged well and they have been shown to be wrong, they never apologized, admitted that they were wrong, or suffered consequences in academia. In fact, the authors and the university were awarded promotions and pharmaceutical contracts.
Dr. Watteel could not believe the shaming and silencing that went on around this highly problematic study. She went to the authors, the university, the journal and even the Canadian fraud department and came up empty. That is why she wrote this book. It serves as a timeline of just how authoritarian the Canadian government was during the Covid-19 pandemic and how little science they had to go on. It's admirable how one person's commitment to objective science has kept her on this topic without relent. Unlike this study and the governments' actions, her arguments age well.
Dr. Watteel could not believe the shaming and silencing that went on around this highly problematic study. She went to the authors, the university, the journal and even the Canadian fraud department and came up empty. That is why she wrote this book. It serves as a timeline of just how authoritarian the Canadian government was during the Covid-19 pandemic and how little science they had to go on. It's admirable how one person's commitment to objective science has kept her on this topic without relent. Unlike this study and the governments' actions, her arguments age well.
March 21, 2024
This will either come as no surprise or, you will dismiss it entirely, as the Canadian authorities have done so far.
October 25, 2024
As a Canadian, this is all very interesting but considering the state of this country and the general zeitgeist and ethos of the surrounding world not at all surprising.
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews