What do you think?
Rate this book
Osprey Campaign #38
Colenso 1899: The Boer War in Natal
In 1899 Great Britain was at the height of its Imperial power. The Queen Empress had been on the throne for more than 50 glittering years, and her domain touched upon every continent. Yet, even at this pinnacle of Imperial pomp and majesty, the British army, guardian of the Empire in countless wars across the globe, was destined to be humiliated by poorly-organised citizen militia consisting of men whom the British professionals despised as back-wood farmers. In one week in December 1899 the farmers of the South African Boer Republics of the Orange Free State and the Transvaal inflicted three serious reverses on British troops.
98 pages, Paperback
First published May 15, 1995
51 people want to read
About the author
Ian Knight
91 books26 followersIan Knight, BA, FRGS is a historian, author, battlefield guide and artifacts specialist internationally regarded as a leading authority on the nineteenth-century history of the Zulu kingdom, and in particular the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879. He has a degree in Afro-Caribbean Studies from the University of Kent and has been researching and writing for more than thirty years. He has published over forty books and monographs, the majority of them on Zulu history and the rest on other nineteenth-century British colonial campaigns. He has appeared on-screen in a number of television documentaries. He is an Honorary Research Associate of the KwaZulu-Natal Museum in Pietermaritzburg.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
August 9, 2025
Though the title of Ian Knight’s book refers to one of the defining battles of the second Boer War, it is its subtitle that gives the reader a better understanding of its focus. Knight uses the battle as the centerpiece of a description of the Natal campaign waged by Sir Redvers Buller at the start of the Boer War. In just a few dozen pages, he summarizes with admirable efficiency the context of the war, the events that led to its outbreak, and the emerging situation that Buller faced in Natal upon his arrival in South Africa with his troops. Doing so explains how the newly appointed commander of British forces found himself mounting a relief expedition to save British forces unnecessarily trapped in Ladysmith by the Boers.
Knight’s focus is not confined to the British, however, as he also includes the Boers’ perspective as well. He shows how the same rugged individualism that made them such fearsome fighters on the battlefield also constrained Boer operations, as it limited their ability to maintain an offensive that might have won for them the negotiated peace that their leaders sought. Nevertheless, the tactics practiced by their commandos proved a foreshadowing of the warfare soldiers would face in the next century. As the British discovered at Colenso to their cost, their traditional close-order formations provided easy targets for the long-range Mauser rifles of the Boer marksmen, resulting in unexpectedly high casualties for little gain. While critical of Buller’s caution, Knight points out that nobody else on the British side had anticipated this situation, and the general adapted to it over the course of the campaign. When coupled with the overwhelming numbers deployed by the British, it proved enough eventually to break through the Boer defenses and relieve Ladysmith.
As Knight acknowledges, the war was decided not in Natal, but by the campaigns further west. Yet thanks to its timing the British defeat at Colenso was combined with the Boer victories at Stormberg and Magersfontein to become part of the infamous “black week” symbolizing the imperial crisis that their empire faced. This exaggerated what the author characterizes as more of a bloody check of Buller’s campaign than a fatal setback for his operations. Despite this, his defeat was enough to cost Buller his command, and to turn the battle into an enduring metaphor for Britain’s military failings. Knight’s book is an efficient account of it, one that is abundantly illustrated with photos and three-dimensional maps of the battles. While it suffers from the poor editing that is unfortunately characteristic of Osprey titles, the flaws are too minor to detract from what is a clearly presented and highly useful account of one of the most famous campaigns in British imperial history.
Knight’s focus is not confined to the British, however, as he also includes the Boers’ perspective as well. He shows how the same rugged individualism that made them such fearsome fighters on the battlefield also constrained Boer operations, as it limited their ability to maintain an offensive that might have won for them the negotiated peace that their leaders sought. Nevertheless, the tactics practiced by their commandos proved a foreshadowing of the warfare soldiers would face in the next century. As the British discovered at Colenso to their cost, their traditional close-order formations provided easy targets for the long-range Mauser rifles of the Boer marksmen, resulting in unexpectedly high casualties for little gain. While critical of Buller’s caution, Knight points out that nobody else on the British side had anticipated this situation, and the general adapted to it over the course of the campaign. When coupled with the overwhelming numbers deployed by the British, it proved enough eventually to break through the Boer defenses and relieve Ladysmith.
As Knight acknowledges, the war was decided not in Natal, but by the campaigns further west. Yet thanks to its timing the British defeat at Colenso was combined with the Boer victories at Stormberg and Magersfontein to become part of the infamous “black week” symbolizing the imperial crisis that their empire faced. This exaggerated what the author characterizes as more of a bloody check of Buller’s campaign than a fatal setback for his operations. Despite this, his defeat was enough to cost Buller his command, and to turn the battle into an enduring metaphor for Britain’s military failings. Knight’s book is an efficient account of it, one that is abundantly illustrated with photos and three-dimensional maps of the battles. While it suffers from the poor editing that is unfortunately characteristic of Osprey titles, the flaws are too minor to detract from what is a clearly presented and highly useful account of one of the most famous campaigns in British imperial history.
March 29, 2020
A good addition to my Osprey Campaign series.
October 9, 2007
Another book that shows that one mans victory is usually a result of another mans folly.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews