What do you think?
Rate this book
Red Symphony
Jesus photo enclosed.
56 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1968
4 people are currently reading
150 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
November 16, 2018
It's a very interesting book that reflects the meticulous artificial polarization of society, divided into minor issues that prevent the perception of power. The refined methods of manipulation and torture exercised by the Communists in the now defunct Soviet Union are also described vividly.
Another striking and interesting aspect is that this book also presents a "conspiracy theory" about the interrogation of Christian Rakovsky in 1938 during the Great Purge, an interrogation to which the author, Dr. Josef Landowsky apparently attended as a doctor . During the interrogation, Rakovsky made reference to a Jewish-Masonic-Communist-International Conspiracy. It's worth noting that Christian Rakovsky was indeed one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism, as well as one of the victims of the show trials held by Stalin before the Second World War.
Even when there are not too many indications of its authenticity, it's still a very interesting reading in which it's possible to distinguish certain patterns that are repeated today.
Another striking and interesting aspect is that this book also presents a "conspiracy theory" about the interrogation of Christian Rakovsky in 1938 during the Great Purge, an interrogation to which the author, Dr. Josef Landowsky apparently attended as a doctor . During the interrogation, Rakovsky made reference to a Jewish-Masonic-Communist-International Conspiracy. It's worth noting that Christian Rakovsky was indeed one of the founders of Soviet Bolshevism, as well as one of the victims of the show trials held by Stalin before the Second World War.
Even when there are not too many indications of its authenticity, it's still a very interesting reading in which it's possible to distinguish certain patterns that are repeated today.
June 20, 2020
Rakovsky protocols, known as "Red Symphony". Authentic document or not, this text is a complicated exercise in dialectics, political philosophy (marxism and capitalism), conflictology, globalism and other fields of abstract exploration, I am not so competent to name them.
Ok, let's say, this is something for your critical thinking. Something to train your skills to question the official discourse and narrative itself. I can not promise it will not poison your thinking.
Well written, not easy to digest, especially in our times of deception, everything fake, everything instant and distracting, everything postmodern. I need to say, this text also feels fake to me - not because of the facts or interpretation, but because of the sharp intelligence/erudition and polite bilateral kindness of both speakers.
"It is known that Marxism was called Hegelian. So this question was vulgarised. Hegelian idealism is a widespread adjustement to an uninformed understanding in the West of the natural mysticism of Baruch Spinosa. "They" are Spinosists: perhaps the matter is the other way round, i.e. that Spinosism is "Them", insofar as he is only a version adequate to the epoch of "Their" own philosophy, which is a much earlier one, standing on a much higher level. After all, a Hegelian and for that reason also the follower of Spinosa, was devoted to his faith, but only temporary, tactically. The matter does not stand as is claimed by Marxism, that as the result of the elimination of contradictions there arises the synthesis. It is as the result of the opposing mutual fusion, from the thesis and antithesis that there arises, as a synthesis, the reality, truth, as a final harmony between the subjective and objective. Do you not see that already? (..) Moscow is subjective Communism, but Capitalism objective - State Capitalism. New York: Capitalism subjective, but Communism objective. A personal sythesis, truth: the Financial International, the Capitalist-Communist one. "They." "
Ok, let's say, this is something for your critical thinking. Something to train your skills to question the official discourse and narrative itself. I can not promise it will not poison your thinking.
Well written, not easy to digest, especially in our times of deception, everything fake, everything instant and distracting, everything postmodern. I need to say, this text also feels fake to me - not because of the facts or interpretation, but because of the sharp intelligence/erudition and polite bilateral kindness of both speakers.
"It is known that Marxism was called Hegelian. So this question was vulgarised. Hegelian idealism is a widespread adjustement to an uninformed understanding in the West of the natural mysticism of Baruch Spinosa. "They" are Spinosists: perhaps the matter is the other way round, i.e. that Spinosism is "Them", insofar as he is only a version adequate to the epoch of "Their" own philosophy, which is a much earlier one, standing on a much higher level. After all, a Hegelian and for that reason also the follower of Spinosa, was devoted to his faith, but only temporary, tactically. The matter does not stand as is claimed by Marxism, that as the result of the elimination of contradictions there arises the synthesis. It is as the result of the opposing mutual fusion, from the thesis and antithesis that there arises, as a synthesis, the reality, truth, as a final harmony between the subjective and objective. Do you not see that already? (..) Moscow is subjective Communism, but Capitalism objective - State Capitalism. New York: Capitalism subjective, but Communism objective. A personal sythesis, truth: the Financial International, the Capitalist-Communist one. "They." "
March 2, 2021
Intefested reading.
May 10, 2025
Nothing to see in the first 1/3rd, so I cut it loose.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews