reading yung pueblo is always a reflective invitation to look into a mirror of your present state of life.
good reminders on releasing control & past to enjoy the present, embracing emotions while regulating responses, the patience needed in healing every step of the way, and practicing self-awareness to maintain inner peace amidst chaos.
this book emphasized not having attachments at all as the key to happiness, but I think there could’ve been more nuance– attachment to the wrong things, or attaching to lesser things when there are better things. pueblo suggests we “enjoy without getting attached” but how? attachment imo is a sign that you care- that you have stake in that other person’s well-being. again, perhaps it’s less about being attached but rather about being willing to release at the right time.
some lines read beautifully as poetry, but did not logically complete for me (eg. the conclusion to “feel it all and know how fleeting it all is”). but if I knew something would be fleeting and I’d have to suffer its loss, why would I want to feel it? I would rather not feel it at all. imo the reason I feel is because I believe that the “craving” can be fulfilled eternally in some capacity, and not all “cravings” are bad (as the book portrays) because they point to a real yearning of the human soul, eg. to be loved unconditionally, forever.
this book also extolled embracing change and how necessary it was in a fast-moving world, but fell short of acknowledging the joys in constancy– the beauty that comes from grounding our lives in things that remain a source of stability for us.
if I had to summarize this book it would be this paradox: “detachment is the only thing to attach to”