This comprehensive guide to the history of literary criticism from antiquity to the present day provides an authoritative overview of the major movements, figures, and texts of literary criticism, as well as surveying their cultural, historical, and philosophical contexts.
Supplies the cultural, historical and philosophical background to the literary criticism of each era
Enables students to see the development of literary criticism in context
Organised chronologically, from classical literary criticism through to deconstruction
Considers a wide range of thinkers and events from the French Revolution to Freud’s views on civilization
Can be used alongside any anthology of literary criticism or as a coherent stand-alone introduction
A succinct guide to the major critical concepts in literature right from Plato to contemporary times - absolutely wonderful, but needs the reader to be at least somewhat acquainted with the major literary/critical traditions of Western philosophy and literature. Also very useful as a comprehensive account of different threads in a given literary/critical movement, enabling a comparative analysis of the whole movement in a nutshell.
Comprehensive, well-written, concise and heavily condensed - hence a rich, short but extremely dense account - but only for those attempting higher studies - absolutely not for undergrads lacking awareness in the basic concepts of western philosophy and literary/critical traditions.
Firstly Habib has done a tremendous job with a huge and daunting task. This is nothing less than a history of literary criticism and critical theory from Plato in the C4th BCE to Foucault and the postmodernists. In the introduction s/he sets out the way this differs from other anthologies/histories of critical movements but I'm sad to say the book doesn't quite live up to its aspirations.
The first sections on Plato and Aristotle are superb, not just putting them into their historical/cultural/political contexts but also writing an excellent and enlightening commentary on their key texts; and if this format had been followed throughout, this would probably have been a 5* book. As it is, the later sections become far more bitty and summarising. Perhaps this is inevitable given the huge number of theories and ways of reading that now jostle for our attention, but I was hoping that this would be a little deeper than the few page summaries of Lacan, Saussure, Foucault etc that we get.
Also the early chapters were marvels of lucid prose, but again the later sections become more and more inpenetrable (as the originals are...) which is a shame. Perhaps there is no easy way to do justice to Cixous and Irigaray (for example) other than in convolutions but I was hoping that Habib would manage it.
Altogether this is an excellent attempt but I for one am still waiting for that elusive companion which will make all clear. It is well-deserving of its accolades and prizes but I fear in the final estimation doesn't clarify the modern/post-modern any more than the books already out there.
Despite the publishers' blurb this is not a general interest read: and extremely difficult to read cover to cover. The only other criticism is that the bibliographies are extremely short and very out of date.