Revolutionary Brotherhood is a mainstream history of American Freemasonry from 1730-1840. Although he does cover the anti-Masonry political party he either ignores or quickly blows off most of the conspiratorial claims about Freemasonry. One thing he does do a good job of is showing how there are huge differences between various lodges and not all are under the same umbrella. There is also huge debate within the lodges as what Freemasonry and its true purpose actually is. As thick academic history books often are, this is dull at times. However you do get plenty of good information in this both from a mainstream historians perspective and from someone that sees Masonry in a more conspiratorial light.
Definitely one of the best books on the subject of Freemasonry during the American Revolution. First, it is nice to have a non-mason author who is able to have a well-researched work free of typical exaggerated biases.
I would have given it more stars if not for two major weaknesses, first the author repeats himself quite frequently reiterating the same points over and over again. This could have been done more concisely with the same overall effect. Second the author's writing style is incredibly dry and reads like more like an Encyclopedia, which is a shame given the fascinating subject matter.
This book had some real potential to put to rest several of the most widely circulated conspiracy theories and paint an accurate picture once and for all. It comes close to do this but just falls short.
Pre-Revolutionary Masonry
"Colonial Masonry was not a middle-class order that embraced a wide range of members. Instead, membership was restricted almost exclusively to men of rank"
"The spread of Masonry across the Atlantic formed part of the eighteenth-century Anglicization of American elites, their increasing adoption of English ways"
"Through its concern for the common good and its use of the verbal and visual symbols of enlightened gentility, Masonry thus identified itself as a brotherhood of cosmopolitan and respected men joining together to better society"
Revolutionary Masonry
"Colonial Masonry helped blunt and buffer the divisive forces of ethnicity, religion, and nationality"
"Masonic Lodges thus brought together a large cross section of their city's most important men"
"Masonry admits of no rank except the priority of merit and its only aritocracy is the nobility of virtue" -Clinton deWitt
The star guidance here at Goodreads has two stars meaning "it was okay," and three stars as "I liked it."
In that case, this book gets two and a half stars. Sometimes I really liked it, and sometimes it was simply okay.
Part of the issue is that Revolutionary Brotherhood is a scholarly work and it has been close to 20 years since I got my master's degree and was in the practice of reading this kind of scholarship. And it was really the book's structure that threw me off. Each section of each chapter would start with a few pages laying out the thesis, then spend the next several pages explaining the background and presenting evidence for that thesis, and then would end with a summary of all the evidence and restate the thesis. I tended to get frustrated with the repetition inherent in that formula. That's where it was merely "okay."
Where I liked it is that there is some really good history here — both of Freemasonry and of American society in its first Century as a new nation. I am a Master Mason from Pennsylvania and learned a lot about how my fraternity came here and how it helped change American society and was changed in responses to it.