Up the rating to 3.5 stars.
I covered the Rule 37 hearings and the subsequent release of the three convicted in the West Memphis 3 homicides when I was a reporter for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. I was also on the periphery of the original case when I was a stringer reporter for the Memphis Commercial Appeal back in the early 1990s.
I know enough about this case to not be convinced of the three's guilt. I read the Misskelley confession and was convinced the three did it. Then, I started seeing some discrepancies. I think the most glaring one was Jason Baldwin's alibi. There really was no way he could be at the crime scene at the time the slayings occurred.
The oddest part of covering this was the Rule 37 hearings which attempted to show that the defendants' attorneys were not doing their job. I noticed Dan Stidham, who represented Misskelley, cared enough about his client then that he tried to show his legal "incompetence" in the trials. It was a lengthy process for those hearings and, based on the judge's results, pretty much a time-waster.
I was somewhat put off by Stidham's constant slamming of prosecutor Brent Davis. I've known Brent for 30 years and think he's one of the more honest, true-hearted people out there. I know that goes against those who were involved in the Free the West Memphis 3 organization, but regardless, Brent is a good person. (and on a side note, I was one of two reporters cited on the Free the West Memphis 3 site as being fair and not biased toward the three's guilt.)
However, eventually, the three were released on an Alford plea.
I thought Stidham did a decent job recounting his efforts to free Misskelley. The beginning of the book, I felt though, was a bit rushed and confusing. It seemed to jump around and assume that the reader knew a lot of the case before delving into this book. Had I not covered it extensively, I may have been lost. There was also some tedious parts that maybe only lawyers would appreciate when Stidham talked about the laws involved and his efforts.
Also, there were several minor errors. For example, Kankakee, Ill., is on Interstate 57, not I55, as he writes. He misspelled Judge David Burnett's name once, dropping the second "t" off the last name. He also wrote about going to a New York Yankees game in 1998 and how at the end of the season, the Yankees had won more games than any team before. Wrong. The 1906 Chicago Cubs won 116. two more than the Yankees had at the end of the 1998 season. He also noted that Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa were trying to break Roger Maris' home run record of "60." Actually, Maris' record was 61 home runs for a season. These are very minor errors but, as they told us in newspaper land, small errors can create distrust and readers may question the accuracy of real facts.
Of all the defense attorneys who were involved in this case-- and there were a lot once the case got national attention (the timing of this was perfect in that the internet was just becoming a thing and the case got a lot of notoriety) -- I felt Stidham was the most sincere and caring.