What do you think?
Rate this book
O marxismo e a loucura
Quais as contribuições de Marx e do marxismo para a análise da loucura, da sua produção e do que ela expressa? Em que sentido é possível desenvolver uma práxis sobre a loucura no/pelo marxismo? No presente livro, buscamos responder ambas as perguntas. O que propomos, sabendo da ousadia de tal proposição e dos grandes riscos de não a atingirmos, é uma análise da loucura a partir de Marx e pelo marxismo; ou seja, um mergulho em sua teoria social e práxis revolucionária, extraindo deles armas da crítica para conhecermos como se dá a produção da loucura vinculada à produção da vida e como elas se dão, são entendidas (ou não são) e abordadas no modo de produção capitalista.
É no bojo desse pensamento que a LavraPalavra lança, sob a organização de Pedro Henrique Antunes da Costa, uma coletânea de textos de diversos autores para (a) apresentar reflexões do próprio Marx sobre o tema, oriundas de textos e produções suas não tão conhecidos em nossa realidade; (b) demonstrar como é possível e necessário extrair – e, nisso, aprimorar, desenvolver – teorizações sobre a loucura nos marcos de sua análise totalizante e a partir da sua forma de apreensão do real, denominado de materialismo histórico-dialético; e (c) aproximar ainda mais o marxismo da loucura, isto é, da temática da loucura enquanto problemática fundamental para o entendimento do capitalismo e sua superação.
É no bojo desse pensamento que a LavraPalavra lança, sob a organização de Pedro Henrique Antunes da Costa, uma coletânea de textos de diversos autores para (a) apresentar reflexões do próprio Marx sobre o tema, oriundas de textos e produções suas não tão conhecidos em nossa realidade; (b) demonstrar como é possível e necessário extrair – e, nisso, aprimorar, desenvolver – teorizações sobre a loucura nos marcos de sua análise totalizante e a partir da sua forma de apreensão do real, denominado de materialismo histórico-dialético; e (c) aproximar ainda mais o marxismo da loucura, isto é, da temática da loucura enquanto problemática fundamental para o entendimento do capitalismo e sua superação.
280 pages, Paperback
Published January 1, 2023
12 people want to read
About the author
Karl Marx
3,251 books6,542 followersWith the help of Friedrich Engels, German philosopher and revolutionary Karl Marx wrote
The Communist Manifesto
(1848) and
Das Kapital
(1867-1894), works, which explain historical development in terms of the interaction of contradictory economic forces, form many regimes, and profoundly influenced the social sciences.
German social theorist Friedrich Engels collaborated with Karl Marx on The Communist Manifesto in 1848 and on numerous other works.
Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin in London opposed Communism of Karl Marx with his antithetical anarchy.
Works of Jacques Martin Barzun include Darwin, Marx, Wagner (1941).
The Prussian kingdom introduced a prohibition on Jews, practicing law; in response, a man converted to Protestantism and shortly afterward fathered Karl Marx.
Marx began co-operating with Bruno Bauer on editing Philosophy of Religion of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (see Democritus and Epicurus), doctoral thesis, also engaged Marx, who completed it in 1841. People described the controversial essay as "a daring and original piece... in which Marx set out to show that theology must yield to the superior wisdom." Marx decided to submit his thesis not to the particularly conservative professors at the University of Berlin but instead to the more liberal faculty of University of Jena, which for his contributed key theory awarded his Philosophiae Doctor in April 1841. Marx and Bauer, both atheists, in March 1841 began plans for a journal, entitled Archiv des Atheismus (Atheistic Archives), which never came to fruition.
Marx edited the newspaper Vorwärts! in 1844 in Paris. The urging of the Prussian government from France banished and expelled Marx in absentia; he then studied in Brussels. He joined the league in 1847 and published.
Marx participated the failure of 1848 and afterward eventually wound in London. Marx, a foreigner, corresponded for several publications of United States.
He came in three volumes. Marx organized the International and the social democratic party.
Marx in a letter to C. Schmidt once quipped, "All I know is that I am not a Marxist," as Warren Allen Smith related in Who's Who in Hell .
People describe Marx, who most figured among humans. They typically cite Marx with Émile Durkheim and Max Weber, the principal modern architects.
Bertrand Russell later remarked of non-religious Marx, "His belief that there is a cosmic ... called dialectical materialism, which governs ... independently of human volitions, is mere mythology" ( Portraits from Memory , 1956).
More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bi...
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/...
http://www.historyguide.org/intellect...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic...
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/...
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/t...
German social theorist Friedrich Engels collaborated with Karl Marx on The Communist Manifesto in 1848 and on numerous other works.
Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin in London opposed Communism of Karl Marx with his antithetical anarchy.
Works of Jacques Martin Barzun include Darwin, Marx, Wagner (1941).
The Prussian kingdom introduced a prohibition on Jews, practicing law; in response, a man converted to Protestantism and shortly afterward fathered Karl Marx.
Marx began co-operating with Bruno Bauer on editing Philosophy of Religion of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (see Democritus and Epicurus), doctoral thesis, also engaged Marx, who completed it in 1841. People described the controversial essay as "a daring and original piece... in which Marx set out to show that theology must yield to the superior wisdom." Marx decided to submit his thesis not to the particularly conservative professors at the University of Berlin but instead to the more liberal faculty of University of Jena, which for his contributed key theory awarded his Philosophiae Doctor in April 1841. Marx and Bauer, both atheists, in March 1841 began plans for a journal, entitled Archiv des Atheismus (Atheistic Archives), which never came to fruition.
Marx edited the newspaper Vorwärts! in 1844 in Paris. The urging of the Prussian government from France banished and expelled Marx in absentia; he then studied in Brussels. He joined the league in 1847 and published.
Marx participated the failure of 1848 and afterward eventually wound in London. Marx, a foreigner, corresponded for several publications of United States.
He came in three volumes. Marx organized the International and the social democratic party.
Marx in a letter to C. Schmidt once quipped, "All I know is that I am not a Marxist," as Warren Allen Smith related in Who's Who in Hell .
People describe Marx, who most figured among humans. They typically cite Marx with Émile Durkheim and Max Weber, the principal modern architects.
Bertrand Russell later remarked of non-religious Marx, "His belief that there is a cosmic ... called dialectical materialism, which governs ... independently of human volitions, is mere mythology" ( Portraits from Memory , 1956).
More: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marx/
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bi...
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/...
http://www.historyguide.org/intellect...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic...
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/...
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/t...
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
November 15, 2025
Teoria crítica, história social e experiências da loucura revelam como os processos de adoecimento mental estão relacionados às estruturas econômicas e às violências que moldam o cotidiano. A leitura mostra às contradições do capitalismo e suas reverberações nos corpos e mentes, sem jamais perder de vista a dimensão humana, o social e o coletivo dos sujeitos.
O único ponto negativo é que, às vezes, o autor é bem prolixo, o que torna a leitura muito repetitiva e cansativa.
O único ponto negativo é que, às vezes, o autor é bem prolixo, o que torna a leitura muito repetitiva e cansativa.
Displaying 1 of 1 review